Advertisement

Exploring the Impacts of Age and Usage Experience of e-Service on User Perceived Web Quality

  • Chien Hsiang LiaoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9193)

Abstract

Prior studies have shown that while older adults use web or e-service, they tend to rely on user accessibility guidelines or friendly web appearance. For instance, older people have difficulty reading text presentations more than younger readers. Inappropriate design decisions might create barriers for older people. However, this causality might not be entirely resulting from age. This study found that the usage experience of e-service is also strongly associated with the requirements of web quality for users as well. The empirical study was conducted on a sample of 318 users of using web services. The results reveal that the requirements of web quality (including web appearance, context quality, and technical adequacy) between older and younger adults are not significantly different. Instead, users with low usage experience require greater web quality than experienced users.

Keywords

Web quality Age Usage experience Satisfaction Trust 

References

  1. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)Google Scholar
  2. Aladwani, A.M., Palvia, P.C.: Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Inf. Manag. 39(6), 467–476 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, H.H., Mark, G., Leach, M.: Building customer relations over the internet. Ind. Mark. Manag. 31(2), 155–163 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collier, J.E., Bienstock, C.C.: Measuring service quality in e-retailing. J. Serv. Res. 8(3), 260–275 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corritore, C.L., Kracher, B., Wiedenbeck, S.: Online trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 58(6), 737–758 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cristobal, E., Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M.: Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ): measurement validation and effects on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 17(3), 317–340 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curran, K., Walters, N., Robinson, D.: Investigating the problems faced by older adults and people with disabilities in online environments. Behav. Inf. Technol. 26(6), 447–453 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fassnacht, M., Koese, I.: Quality of electronic services conceptualizing and testing a hierarchical model. J. Serv. Res. 9(1), 19–37 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garbarino, E., Johnson, M.S.: The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. J. Mark. 63(2), 70–87 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gummerus, J., Veronica, L., Pura, M., Allard, R.: Customer loyalty to content-based websites: the case of an online health-care service. J. Serv. Mark. 18(3), 175–186 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hart, T.A., Chaparro, B.S., Halcomb, C.G.: Evaluating websites for older adults: adherence to ‘senior-friendly’ guidelines and end-user performance. Behav. Inf. Technol. 27(3), 191–199 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liao, C.H., Yen, H.R., Li, E.Y.: The effect of channel quality inconsistency on the association between e-service quality and customer relationships. Internet Res. 21(4), 458–478 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgan, R.M., Hunt, S.D.: The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Mark. 58(3), 20–38 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morris, M.G., Venkatesh, V., Ackerman, P.L.: Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 52(1), 69–84 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muylle, S., Moenaert, R., Despontin, M.: The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Inf. Manag. 41(5), 543–560 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Priest, L., Nayak, L., Stuart-Hamilton, I.: Website task performance by older adults. Behav. Inf. Technol. 26(3), 189–195 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roberts, K., Varki, S., Brodie, R.: Measuring the quality of relationships in consumer services: an empirical study. Eur. J. Mark. 37(1/2), 169–196 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saeed, K.A., Abdinnour-Helm, S.: Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post adoption usage of information systems. Inf. Manag. 45(6), 376–386 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sousa, R., Voss, C.A.: Service quality in multichannel services employing virtual channels. J. Serv. Res. 8(4), 356–371 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Taylor, S., Todd, P.: Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Q. 19(4), 561–570 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 27(3), 451–481 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. Wolfinbarger, M., Gilly, M.C.: eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring, and predicting e-tail quality. J. Retail. 79(3), 183–198 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., Zhou, N.: Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Inf. Manag. 42(4), 575–589 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yoo, B., Donthu, N.: Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of internet shopping sites (SITEQUAL). Q. J. Electron. Commer. 2(1), 31–47 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. Zeithaml, V., Parusuraman, A., Malhotra, A.: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding e-Service Quality: Implications for Future Research and Managerial Practice, pp. 1–115. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  27. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., Malhotra, A.: Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(4), 362–375 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ManagementFu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations