A Living Lab Method for Innovations to Increase Quality of Life for Elderly - A Pilot Case

  • Isabella ScandurraEmail author
  • Madeleine Blusi
  • Rolf Dalin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9193)


A Swedish Living Lab has recently been established offering care organizations a test and evaluation method as an activity in their intrinsic development process. Using the method, innovations for an aging population are assessed, guided by quality criteria as well-being, dignity, value for the elderly and usability.

This paper describes the method through a pilot test, carried out in November 2014 by the elderly themselves and health and social care staff at a nursing home together with different academic parts in a multidisciplinary test process. The method allows for interaction between innovators and stakeholders as well as potential end-users in the elderly care sector. Simultaneously, the users’ quality aspects are kept in focus when innovations for the aging society are tested.


Aging society Elderly care Innovation Living lab Usability User participation Health/welfare development Test Evaluation User-centricity 



We would like to thank all participants at the nursing home Viktoriagården in Kramfors, Sweden, for their work and engagement. We would also like to thank the representatives of SCA Hygiene Products AB for good teamwork and for providing the innovation TENA Identifi TM for pilot testing as well as Pär Näslund and Katarina Palmgren for their field work. Finally we thank the Swedish agency for innovation systems, VINNOVA and the County Administrative Board in Västernorrland for financing the research and development project Norrlandicus.


  1. 1.
    European Commission: The 2009 Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 Member States 2008-2060. European Commission - DG for Economic and Social Affairs, Economic Policy Committee, Brussels (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoffmann, F., Rodrigues, R.: ‘Informal Carers – Who takes care of them?’ Policy Brief, April 2010. European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keating, N.: Rural Ageing: A Good Place to Grow Old? The Policy Press, Bristol (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Håfström, D., Fransson, E.: eHealth in Swedish Municipalities 2013-2015- For Better Services, Independence and Autonomy. SKL, Stockholm (2013). (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blusi, M.: E-health and information- and communication technology (ICT) as support systems for older family caregivers in rural areas. Mid Sweden University doctoral thesis: 203, Sundsvall (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blusi, M., Asplund, K., Jong, M.: Older family carers in rural areas: experiences from using caregiver support services based on Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Eur. J. Ageing 10(3), 191–199 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s10433-013-0260-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sjölinder, M., Scandurra, I.: Effects of using care professionals in the development of social technology for elderly. In: Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction International 2015, HCII 2015, 2–7 August 2015, Los Angeles, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blusi, M., Kristiansen, L., Jong, M.: Exploring the influence of Internet-based caregiver support on experiences of isolation for older spouse caregivers in rural areas: a qualitative interview study. Int. J. Older People Nurs. (2014). doi: 10.1111/opn.12074 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sävenstedt, S., Florin, J.: Information- and communication technology. In: Edberg, A.K., Ehrenberg, A., Friberg, F., Wallin, L., Wijk, H., Öhlén, J. (eds.) Nursing at Advanced Level – Core Competences Within Specialist Nursing. pp. 217–258, Lund (2013). (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walldén, M.: Test beds – to test for the future. In: Cory, A., Wandrell, K. (eds.) Vinnova-nytt 1: 2013 (2013). ISSN 1653-2759 (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    eHealth Projects: Research and Innovation in the field of ICT for Health and Wellbeing: an overview, September 2014. Accessed 14 Feb 2015
  12. 12.
    Flick, U.: Triangulation. In: Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., Steinke, I. (eds.) Qualitative Research – Paradigms, Theories, Methods, Practice and Contexts. Sage, London (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    SOSFS Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare: National Advice on values in eldercare. In Swedish: Socialstyrelsens allmänna råd (SOSFS 2012:3) om värdegrunden i socialtjänstens omsorg om äldre (2012). (In Swedish)
  15. 15.
    Antonowsky, A.: Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO 9241-11:1998: Ergonomic requirements for office work. Part 11: Guidance on usability.
  17. 17.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013). Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sauro, J.: Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) (2011).
  19. 19.
    Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T.: Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidens for Nursing Practice, 9th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Medical Association: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.
  22. 22.
    Hägglund, M., Scandurra, I., Koch, S.: Supporting citizen-centred care for seniors – experiences from two Swedish research projects. In: Proceedings of 25th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, CBMS (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rigby, M., Koch, S., Keeling, D., Hill, P., Alonso, A., Maeckelberghe, E.: Developing a new understanding of enabling health and wellbeing in Europe – harmonising health and social care delivery and informatics support to ensure holistic care. ESF SCSS Science Position Paper (2013). ISBN: 978-2-918428-92-3Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wagner, E.H., Bennett, S.M., Austin, B.T., Green, S.M., Schaefer, J.K., Vonkorff, M.: Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based Chronic Illness Care. J Altern. Complement Med. 11 (Suppl.), S7–S25 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaplan, B., Shaw, N.: People, organizational, and social issues: evaluation as an exemplar. In: Haux, R. (ed.) Yearbook of Medical Informatics, pp. 71–88. Schattauer, Stuttgart (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabella Scandurra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Madeleine Blusi
    • 2
  • Rolf Dalin
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Business, Department of InformaticsÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  2. 2.R&D DepartmentThe Association of Local Authorities in Västernorrland CountyHärnösandSweden

Personalised recommendations