Skip to main content

Mathys Affinis® Inverse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Abstract

The Affinis Inverse was developed to reduce implant-specific complications and problems of the Grammont prosthesis such as humeral and glenoid loosening, component disconnections, and periprosthetic humeral fractures. The main problem—the glenoid component fixation and positioning in combination with the notching phenomenon—was the initial challenge for the development. The neck-shaft inclination, the center of rotation at the glenoid bone–prosthesis interface, and the inlay cup depth were assessed as sensitive concerning instabilities and glenoid loosening. Therefore, these design features were kept according to Grammont’s concept. The main modifications are a new 2-peg baseplate fixation without an inferior screw and the inversion of the bearing materials. In a prospective multicenter study in six European centers (88 cases, mean follow-up time 49.0 months), the concept has proven an optimized fixation, no component disassembly, and a new type of a simple mechanical notching on the scapular neck. No progressive notching caused by polyethylene abrasion was observed at this stage. A considerably reduced complication rate of 4.5 %, revision rate of 3.4 %, and a clinical outcome comparable to common RTSA systems confirm these optimizations in the early course. The placement of the baseplate, the three glenosphere sizes (36; 39; 42) for better soft tissue balancing, and the resulting inferior overhang of the glenosphere were confirmed as efficient to reduce scapular notching. The introduction of optimized bearing materials (HXLPE and ceramic) will reduce the gravimetric wear significant. The clinical relevance has to be proven in the long-term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ASTM F2028-08. Standard test methods for dynamic evaluation of glenoid loosening or disassociation. West Conshohocken, PA: American Societiy for Testing and Materials; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASTM F1839-97. Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and materials. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I. Neer Award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(5):527–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. Delta III reverse shoulder arthroplasty: radiological outcome for acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(5):325–9. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Data on file—TDE001241 Oct 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Data on file—TDE001242 Oct 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Data on file—TDE001216 August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Data on file—20140127_Report_Affinis Inverse.

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Wilde L, Defoort S, Verstraeten TR, Speeckaert W, Debeer P. A 3D-CT scan study of the humeral and glenoid planes in 150 normal shoulders. Surg Radiolg Anat. 2012;34(8):743–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Wilde LF, Poncet D, Middernacht B, Ekelund A. Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(6):719-26. doi:10.3109/17453674.2010.538354.

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Wilde LF, Audenaert EA, Berghs BM. Shoulder prostheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative biomechanical study. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(6):1222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(8):1697-705. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02813.

  14. Groh GI, Groh MG. Complications rates, reoperation rates, and the learning curve in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(3):388–94. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O’Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(5):707–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohut G, Dallmann F, Irlenbusch U. Wear-induced loss of mass in reversed total shoulder arthroplasty with conventional and inverted bearing materials. J Biomech. 2012;45(3):469–73. doi:10.10.16/j.jbiomech.2011.11.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Middernacht B, De Wilde L, Molé D, Favard L, Debeer P. Glenosphere disengagement: a potentially serious default in reverse shoulder surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(4):892–8. doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0090-6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Molé D, Favard L. Omarthose excentrée: symposium. Rev Chir Orthop. 2007;93:3S37–94.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reuther F, Kohut G, Nijs S. Modulare Inverse Frakturendoprothese bei nicht rekonstruierbarer Humeruskopffraktur des alten Menschen. Oper Orthop Traumatol. Forthcoming; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reuther F, Irlenbusch U, Kääb M, Joudet T, Proust J, Kohut G. Conversion from hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder. Can the humeral head be left in place? Paper presented at 12th international congress of shoulder and elbow surgery (ICSES), Nagoya, Japan. SPO-8-31; 10–12 April 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Molé D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(3):388–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thienpont E, Berger Y. No allergic reaction after TKA in a chrome-cobalt-nickel-sensitive patient: case report and review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(3):636–40. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2000-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas P, Braathen LR, Dörig M, Auböck J, Nestle F, Werfel T, Willert HG. Increased metal allergy in patients with failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty and peri-implant T-lymphocytic inflammation. Allergy. 2009;64(8):1157–65. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01966.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Werner BS, Boehm D, Gohlke F. Revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty with retention of the humeral component. Acta Orthop. 2013;84(5):473–8. doi:10.3109/17453674.2013.842433.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(1):146–57. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Dallmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dallmann, F., Egger, M., Joudet, T. (2016). Mathys Affinis® Inverse. In: Frankle, M., Marberry, S., Pupello, D. (eds) Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20840-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20840-4_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20839-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20840-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics