Gender-Technology Relations in the Various Ages of Information Societies

  • Delphine GardeyEmail author
Part of the History of Computing book series (HC)


From “domination” to empowerment, gendered uses of information technologies appear in a variety of situations and interpretations. What is added to the history of technology by their social studies, and what is offered otherwise by the critical input of feminism on this field, is the idea that relations between humans and technologies (gender relations among them) are never set in advance but instead the object, as much as the end game of the analysis, as shown by Judy Wajcman. Yet the “seamless fabric” (with reference to Hughes’ work) interweaving the social and the technological and tying together gender and power relations is enduring; the role of historians is to acknowledge its lasting existence.


Gender Relation Digital Economy Occupational Identity Corporate Space Gender Trouble 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abbate, Janet. 2012. Recoding gender. Women’s changing participation in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akrich, Madeleine. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects. In Shaping technology-building society: studies in sociotechnical change, ed. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law, 205–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Akrich, Madeleine, Michel Callon, and Bruno Latour (eds.). 2006. Sociologie de la traduction: textes fondateurs. Paris: Mines ParisTech/Les Presses.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Gregory (ed.). 1989. The white blouse revolution. Female office workers since 1870. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ashcraft, Karen Lee and Catherine Ashcraft. 2015. Breaking the “glass slipper”: What diversity interventions can learn from the historical evolution of occupational identity in ICT and commercial aviation. In Connecting women, ed. V. Schafer and B.G. Thierry, 137–156. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bernasconi, Gianenrico, and Stephan Nellen. eds. 2015 (Forthcoming). The office as interior (1880-1960). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  7. Brousseau, Eric, and Frédéric Moatty. 2002. La création du Groupe de recherche ‘TIC et société’ au CNRS. Réseaux 2(112–113): 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. 2nd ed. 1999. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell-Kelly, Martin. 1992. Large scale data processing in the prudential 1850–1930. Accounting Business and Financial History 2(2): 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandler, Alfred, and James Cortada (eds.). 2000. A nation transformed by information. How information has shaped the United States from colonial times to present. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cockburn, Cynthia. 1983. Brothers: male dominance and technological change. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cortada, James (ed.). 1998. Rise of the knowledge worker. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. De Certeau, Michel. 1990. L’invention du quotidien. 1. Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  14. Edgerton, David. 1998. De l’innovation aux usages. Dix thèses éclectiques sur l’histoire des techniques. Annales Histoire, Sciences Sociales 53(4–5): 815–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edgerton, David. 2007. The shock of the old. Technology and global history since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, Claude. 1992. America calling. A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gardey, Delphine. 1999. The standardization of a technical practice: typing (1883–1930). History and Technology 15: 313–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardey, Delphine. 2001. Mechanizing writing and photographing the word: utopias, office work, and histories of gender and technology. History and Technology 17: 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardey, Delphine. 2003. De la domination à l’action: quel genre d’usage des technologies de l’information? Réseaux Communication, technologie, sociétés 21: 87–117.Google Scholar
  20. Gardey, Delphine. 2006. Culture of gender, culture of technology: the gendering of things in France’s office spaces between 1890 and 1930. In Cultures of technology, ed. Helga Novotny, 73–94. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  21. Gardey, Delphine. 2008. Ecrire, calculer, classer. Comment une révolution de papier a transformé les sociétés contemporaines (1800–1940). Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  22. Gardey, Delphine. 2009. Au cœur à corps avec le Manifeste Cyborg de Donna Haraway. Esprit: 208–217Google Scholar
  23. Gardey, Delphine. 2014. The reading of an Oeuvre. Donna Haraway: the poetics and politics of life. Feministische Studien, Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung 32(1): 86–100.Google Scholar
  24. Gardey, Delphine. 2015. Le linge du Palais-Bourbon. Corps, matérialité et genre du politique à l’ère démocratique. Bordeaux: Le Bord de l’Eau.Google Scholar
  25. Gardey, Delphine, and Cynthia Kraus (eds.) 2015 (Forthcoming). Politics of coalition. thinking collective action with Judith Butler. Geneva and Zürich: Seismo Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Green, Venus. 1995. Race and technology: African American women in the bell system, 1945–1980, technology and culture. Technology and Culture 36(2): 101–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haraway, Donna. 1985. (Reed. 2003). A cyborg manifesto: science, technology and socialist-feminism in the 1980s. In The Haraway Reader, 7–40 London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Haraway, Donna. 1992. The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Cultural studies, ed. Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson, and Paula A. Treichler, 295–337. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Hoskyns, Teresa. 2005. Designing the Agon: questions on architecture, space, democracy and “the political”. In Making things public: atmospheres of democracy, ed. Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, 798–803. Cambridge/Karlsruhe: The MIT Press/ZKM Center for Art and Media.Google Scholar
  30. Hughes, Thomas P. 1983. Networks of power. Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Huws, Ursula. 2003. The making of cybertariat. Virtual work in real world. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kirkup, Gill, et al. 2000. The gendered cyborg: a reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Krige, John, and Eda Kranakis. eds. 1994. Information technologies and socio-technical systems. History and Technology, 1(1). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Latour, Bruno. 1996. Aramis or the love of technology. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lie, Merete. 2003. Gender and ICT – new connections. In He, she and IT revisited: new perspectives on gender and information society, ed. Merete Lie. Oslo: Gylendal Akademish.Google Scholar
  36. Light, Jennifer. 1999. When computers where women. Technology and Culture 40(3): 455–483.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Lipartito, Kenneth. 1994. When women were switches: technology, work and gender in the telephone industry (1890–1930). American Historical Review 99(4): 1075–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mounier-Kuhn, Pierre-Eric. 2010. L’informatique en France de la seconde guerre mondiale au Plan Calcul. L’émergence d’une science. Paris: Presses universitaires de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
  39. Oldenziel, Ruth. 1996. Objections: technology, culture and gender. In Learning from things. Method and theory of material culture studies, ed. David Kingery, 55–69. Washington, DC: Smithonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  40. Reinhold, Martin. 2009. Unpublished paper. Von Herrmann, Hans-Christian and Sven Spieker (org.). The office in the studio. The administration of modernism. International conference, 23–24 January 2009. Medien Wissenschaft, Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena.Google Scholar
  41. Turkle, Sherry. 1984. The second self: computers and the human spirit. London: Granada.Google Scholar
  42. Wajcman, Judy. 1991. Feminism confronts technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wajcman, Judy. 2006. New connections: social studies of science and technology and studies of work. Work, Employment and Society 20(4): 773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wajcman, Judy. 2007. From women & technology to gendered technoscience. Information, Commnication & Society 10(3): 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Woolgar, Steve. 2000. Virtual technologies and social theory: a technographic approach. In Preferred placement. Knowledge politics on the web, ed. Richard Rogers. Maastricht: Jan Van Eyck Akademie Editions.Google Scholar
  46. Yates, Joan. 1989. Control through communication. The rise of system in American management. Baltimore/London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gender Institute, The Geneva School of Social SciencesGeneva UniversityGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations