Advertisement

Connecting Gender, Women and ICT in Europe: A Long-Term Perspective

  • Valérie SchaferEmail author
  • Benjamin G. Thierry
Chapter
  • 576 Downloads
Part of the History of Computing book series (HC)

Abstract

Cross-analysing the problem of ICT with women and gender’s roles on a long-term perspective, as this collective book aspires to do, may seem challenging. As described in some pioneering historical works, the very notion of computing as a construct calls for a nuanced understanding. Great care is required to avoid amalgams that could introduce an artificial continuity that has no evidentiary basis between human computers, keypunch operators or today’s women labourers in computing (with all the diversity within the milieus of industry, public and private research, education, etc.). Therefore, creating a dialogue that includes diverse ICTs, diverse contexts and various European countries may make this all the more difficult. But the choice to embrace multiplicity seemed relevant from several angles that are discussed in this introductory chapter.

Keywords

Gender Identity Chat Room Occupational Identity Airline Pilot Computer Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbate, J. 2012. Recoding gender: women’s changing participation in computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alberts, Gerard, and Ruth Oldenziel (eds.). 2014. Hacking Europe: from computer cultures to demoscenes. London/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Alberts, Gerard et al. 2008. Software for Europe: constructing Europe through software. Tensions of Europe/inventing Europe working paper no. 2008_03. http://www.tensionsofeurope.eu/www/en/files/get/publications/2008_3.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.
  4. Ashcraft, Karen Lee. 2007. Appreciating the “work” of discourse: occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial airline pilots. Discourse & Communication 1: 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashcraft, Karen Lee. 2013. The glass slipper: “incorporating” occupational identity in management studies. Academy of Management Review 38(1): 6–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashcraft, Catherine. 2014. Increasing the participation of women and underrepresented minorities in computing: missing perspectives and new directions. Orlando: National Science Foundation Computer Science Education Summit.Google Scholar
  7. Aubourg, Valérie, Gérard Bossuat, Eric Bussière, Lucia Coppolaro, et al. 2006. L’Europe et la mondialisation. Paris: Editions Soleb.Google Scholar
  8. Blandin, Claire. 2014. Les discours sur la sexualité dans la presse féminine: le tournant des années 1968. In Sexualités, ed. Etienne Armand Amato, Fred Pailler, and Valérie Schafer, 82–87. Hermès 69.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdeloie, Hélène, and Virginie Julliard. 2013. La question du genre et des TNIC au prisme du dialogue de la sociologie et de la sémiotique. Episteme 9: 243–270.Google Scholar
  10. Britton, D.M. 2000. The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender and Society 14: 418–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burman, Annie. 2013. Gendering decryption – decrypting gender: the gender discourse of labour at Bletchley Park 1939–1945. MA thesis, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  12. Bussière, Eric, Michel Dumoulin, and Sylvain Schirmann. 2008. Milieux économiques et intégration européenne au XXe siècle: La relance des années quatre-vingt (1979–1992). Paris: Comité pour l’Histoire économique et financière.Google Scholar
  13. Canel, Annie, Ruth Oldenziel, and Karin Zachmann (eds.). 2005. Crossing boundaries, building bridges. Comparing the history of women engineers 1870s–1990s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Cassell, Justine, and Henry Jenkins. 1998. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cavallo, Gugliemo, and Roger Chartier. 2001. Histoire de la lecture dans le monde occidental. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. Chartier, Roger. 2003. Pratiques de la lecture. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  17. Cohoon, Joanne, and William Aspray (eds.). 2006. Women and information technology: research on under-representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Collet, Isabelle. 2005. La masculinisation des études d’informatique. Savoir, pouvoir et genre. Thèse de doctorat en Sciences de l’Education, Université Paris X.Google Scholar
  19. Collet, Isabelle. 2006. L’informatique a-t-elle un sexe? Hackers, mythes et réalités. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  20. Collet, Isabelle. 2011. Effet de genre: le paradoxe des études d’informatique. tic&société 5: 1. http://ticetsociete.revues.org/955. Accessed 14 Mar 2015.
  21. Corn, J.J. 1979. Making flying unthinkable: women pilots and the selling of aviation, 1927–1940. American Quarterly 31: 556–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dakhlia, Jamil, and Géraldine Poels. 2012. Le minitel rose: du flirt électronique… et plus, si affinités. Entretien avec Josiane Jouët. Le Temps des médias 19: 221–228. doi: 10.3917/tdm.019.0221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Pange, Pauline (comtesse). 2013. Comment j’ai vu 1900. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
  24. Delarue, Bernard. 1997. Histoire d’une mutation: Des demoiselles du téléphone à la mondialisation des telecommunications. Paris: Le Cherche Midi.Google Scholar
  25. Downs, Laura Lee. 2002. L’inégalité à la chaîne: La Division sexuée du travail dans l’industrie métallurgique en France et en Angleterre, 1914–1939. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  26. Dufour, Pascale, Dominique Masson, and Dominique Caouette (eds.). 2010. Solidarities beyond borders: transnationalizing women’s movements. Vancouver-Toronto: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  27. Durnova, Helena. 2009. Computers as messengers of freedom in Soviet bloc countries. The Tensions of Europe/Inventing Europe working papers series. http://www.tensionsofeurope.eu/www/en/publications/working-papers. Accessed 4 Apr 2015.
  28. Ensmenger, Nathan. 2010a. The computer boys take over: computers, programmers and the politics of technical expertise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ensmenger, N. 2010b. Making programming masculine. In Gender codes: why women are leaving computing? ed. Thomas J. Misa, 115–142. Hoboken: Wiley/IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  30. Ferree, Myra Marx, and Barbara Risman. 2001. Constructing global feminism: transnational advocacy networks and Russian women’s activism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26(4): 1155–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fickers, Andreas et al. 2008. Transmitting and receiving Europe. The tensions of Europe/inventing Europe working papers series. http://www.tensionsofeurope.eu/www/en/publications/working-papers. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.
  32. Gagen, Wendy. 2013. The manly telegrapher: the fashioning of a gendered company culture in the eastern and associated telegraph companies. In Global communication electric: actors of a globalizing world, ed. Michaela Hampf and Simone Müller-Pohl, 170–195. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Gardey, Delphine. 1999. The standardization of a technical practice: typing (1883–1930). His Technol 15: 313–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gardey, Delphine. 2004. La Dactylographe et l’expéditionnaire: histoire des employés de bureau (1890–1930). Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  35. Gardey, Delphine. 2008. Écrire, calculer, classer. Comment une révolution de papier a transformé les sociétés contemporaines (1800–1940). Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  36. Gerovich, Slava. 2008. InterNyet: why the Soviet Union did not build a nationwide computer network. History and Technology 24(4): 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Griset, Pascal. 1991. Les révolutions de la communication XIXe-XXe siècle. Paris: Hachette Supérieur.Google Scholar
  38. Gürer, Denise, and Tracy Camp. 2002. An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. SIGCSE Bulletin 34(2): 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haigh, T. 2010. Masculinity and the machine man. In Gender codes: why women are leaving computing? ed. Thomas J. Misa, 51–71. Hoboken: Wiley/IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  40. Hampf, Michaela, and Simone Müller-Pohl (eds.). 2013. Global communication electric. Business, news and politics in the world of telegraphy. Frankfort: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Haralanova, Kristina. 2010. L’apport des femmes dans le développement du logiciel libre. Master en communication. Montréal: Université du Québec. http://www.archipel.uqam.ca/3873/. Accessed 20 Mar 2015.
  42. Hicks, Mary. 2010a. Meritocracy and feminization in conflict: computerization in the British Government. In Gender codes: why women are leaving computing? ed. Thomas J. Misa, 95–114. Hoboken: Wiley/IEEE Computer Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hicks, Mary. 2010b. Only the clothes changed: women operators in British computing and advertising, 1950–1970. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 32(4): 5–17.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoskyns, Teresa. 2005. Designing the Agon: questions on architecture, space, democracy and “the political”. In Making things public: atmospheres of democracy, ed. Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, 798–803. Cambridge/Karlsruhe: MIT Press/ZKM Center for Art and Media.Google Scholar
  45. Jakić, Bruno. 2014. Galaxy and the new wave: Yugoslav computer culture in the 1980s. In Hacking Europe. From computer cultures to demoscenes, ed. Gerard Alberts and Ruth Oldenziel, 107–128. London/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Jouët, Josianne. 2003. Technologies de communication et genre. Des relations en construction. Réseaux 120: 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Julliard, Virginie, and Nelly Quemener. 2014. Le genre dans la communication et les médias: enjeux et perspectives. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication. 4. http://rfsic.revues.org/693. Accessed 12 Mar 2015.
  48. Lerman, N., R.O. Nina, and A.P. Mohun (eds.). 2003. Gender and technology: a reader. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Levie, Françoise, and Benoît Peeters. 2006. L’homme qui voulait classer le monde: Paul Otlet et le Mundaneum. Bruxelles: Impressions Nouvelles.Google Scholar
  50. Light, Jennifer S. 1999. When computers were women. Technology and Culture 40(3): 455–483.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  51. Light, Jennifer S. 2003. Programming. In Gender and technology: a reader, ed. Nina Lerman, Ruth Oldenziel Nina, and Arwen P. Mohun, 295–327. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mallein, P., Y. Toussaint, and M. Bydlowski. 1984. Teletel 3V, Les Adolescents et leur Famille. In Rapport CPE, Centre d’Etude Prospective et d’Evaluation. Paris: Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Industrie.Google Scholar
  53. Margolis, Jane, and Allan Fisher. 2001. Unlocking the clubhouse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. McMillan, R. 2014. Feminist Hacker Barbie is just what our little girls need. Wired. 21 Nov 2014.Google Scholar
  55. Misa, Thomas J. (ed.). 2010. Gender codes: why women are leaving computing? Hoboken: Wiley/IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  56. Oldenziel, R., and M. Hård. 2013. Consumers, tinkerers, rebels the people who shaped Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Rayward, Boyd W. 2010. Paul, Otlet, encyclopédiste, internationaliste belge. In Paul Otlet. Fondateur du Mundaneum (1868–1944). Architecte du savoir, artisan de paix. Liège: Les impressions Nouvelles.Google Scholar
  58. Schafer, Valérie, and Benjamin G. Thierry. 2012. Le Minitel. L’enfance numérique de la France. Paris: Nuvis.Google Scholar
  59. Schipper, Frank, and Johan Schot. 2011. Infrastructural Europeanism, or the project of building Europe on infrastructures: an introduction. History and Technology 27(3): 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schlombs, C. 2010. A gendered job carousel. In Gender codes: why women are leaving computing? ed. Thomas J. Misa, 75–94. Hoboken: Wiley/IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz, Colette, Yveline Jacquet, and Pierre Lhomme. 2009. Des demoiselles du téléphone aux opérateurs des centres d’appel. Paris: Le Temps des Cerises.Google Scholar
  62. Shapin, Steven. 1989. The invisible technician. American Scientist 77(6): 554–563.Google Scholar
  63. Vehviläinen, Marja. 1997. Gender and expertise in retrospect: pioneers in computing in Finland. In Women, work and computerisation: spinning a web from past To futur, ed. Anna Frances Grundy et al., 435–448. Proceedings of the 6th international IFIP conference. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Vehviläinen, Marja. 1999. Gender and computing in retrospect: the case of Finland. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 21(2): 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vogel, Wiliam F. 2014. Shifting attitudes: women in computing, 1965–1985. SIGCIS workshop. http://www.sigcis.org/files/Vogel.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2015.
  66. Wasiak, Patryk. 2014. Playing and copying: social practices of home computer users in Poland during the 1980s. In Hacking Europe. From computer cultures to demoscenes, ed. Gerard Alberts and Ruth Oldenziel, 129–150. London/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Zakharova, Larissa. 2010. Competition or cooperation? Transfers of telephone and telegraph technologies from Europe to the USSR, 1918–1960s. The tensions of Europe/inventing Europe working papers series. http://www.tensionsofeurope.eu/www/en/publications/working-papers. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.
  68. Zakharova, Larissa. 2012. Téléphones et télégraphes au pays des Soviets. Vecteurs et procédés de circulation des techniques de communication en URSS (1918–1939). Histoire Economie, Sociétés 4: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Communication Sciences, (CNRS, Paris-Sorbonne, UPMC)ParisFrance
  2. 2.Université Paris-SorbonneInstitute for Communication Sciences, (CNRS, Paris-Sorbonne, UPMC)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations