Advertisement

Visualizing Human-Environment Interactions: Integrating Concepts and Techniques from HCI, Human Factors and Media Psychology

  • Bimal BalakrishnanEmail author
  • Loukas Kalisperis
  • Danielle Oprean
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9189)

Abstract

As architecture becomes increasingly integrated with information technology, we need to envision new approaches for architectural visualization. In this paper, we describe an evolving approach for architectural visualization that integrates affordable virtual reality tools, motion capture technology and psychophysiological measurement tools. We start by tracing the development and validation of our two virtual reality labs. Next, we describe our current attempts at visualizing embodied interaction and the use of behavioral agents for simulating human-environment interaction. We conclude by discussing our current work and future directions, particularly our idea to integrate psychophysiological tools for measuring cognitive and affective responses to these information rich environments.

Keywords

Architectural visualization Virtual reality Motion capture 

References

  1. 1.
    Krogh, P.G., Grønbæk, K.: Architecture and pervasive computing - when buildings and design artifacts become computer interfaces. Nord. J. Archit. Res. 14(3), 11–22 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tomitsch, M., Vande Moere, A., Grechenig, T.: A framework for architecture as a medium for expression. In: Workshop on Pervasive Expression. Co-Located with International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive 2008), Sydney, Australia (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Otto, G., Kalisperis, L., Gundrum, J., Muramoto, K., Burris, G., Masters, R., Slobounov, E., Heilman, J., Agarwala, V.: The VR desktop: an accessible approach to VR environments in teaching and research. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 1(2), 233–246 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalisperis, L., Otto, G., Muramoto, K., Gundrum, J., Masters, R., Orland, B.: An affordable immersive environment in beginning design studio education. In: Proceedings of ACADIA, Thresholds - Design, Research, Education and Practice, in the Space Between the Physical and the Virtual, pp. 47–54 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalisperis, L., Otto, G., Muramoto, K., Gundrum, J., Masters, R., Orland, B.: Virtual reality/space visualization in design education: the VR-desktop initiative. In: Proceedings of eCAADe, Design E-ducation: Connecting the Real and the Virtual, pp. 64–71 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balakrishnan, B., Kalisperis, L.N.: Me and my VE: demonstration 5 - building affordable VR environments for education and research. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. Proc. 56, 2515–2516 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balakrishnan, B., Kalisperis, L.N., Muramoto, K.: Spatial presence: explication from an architectural point of view. In: Lilley, B., Beesley, P. (eds.) Expanding Bodies: Art, Cities, Environment, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of ACADIA, pp. 120–127 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 7(3), 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalawsky, R., Bee, S.T., Nee, S.P.: Human factors evaluation to aid understanding of virtual interfaces. BT Technol. J. 17(1), 128–141 (1999). Kluwer Academic PublishersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ijsselsteijn, W.A., De Ridder, H., Freeman, J., Avons, S.E.: Presence: concept, determinants and measurement. In: Proceedings of SPIE - Human Vision and Electronic Imaging Conference, pp. 520–529 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., Saari, T., Laarni, J., Ravaja, N., Gouveia, F.R., Biocca, F., Sacau, A., Jäncke, L., Baumgartner, T., Jäncke, P.: A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychol. 9(3), 493–525 (2007). Taylor & FrancisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takala, T.: A neuropsychologically based approach to creativity. In: Gero, J.S., Maher, M.L. (eds.) Modeling Creativity and Knowledge Based Creative Design, pp. 91–108. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balakrishnan, B., Kalisperis, L.N., Muramoto, K., Otto, G.H.: A multimodal approach towards virtual reality for architectural design [re]presentation. In: Kaga, A., Naka, R. (eds.) Rhythm and Harmony in the Bit-Sphere, Proceedings of CAADRIA 2006, pp. 513–519 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sundar, S.S.: Media effects 2.0: social and psychological effects of communication technologies. In: Nabi, R.L., Oliver, M.B. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects, pp. 545–560. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalisperis, L.N., Muramoto, K., Balakrishnan, B., Nikolic, D., Zikic, N.: Evaluating relative impact of virtual reality system variables on architectural design comprehension. In: Bourdakis, V., Charitos, D. (eds.) Communicating Space(s), Proceedings of eCAADe, pp. 66–73 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balakrishnan, B., Oprean, D., Martin, B., Smith, M.: Virtual reality: factors determining spatial presence comprehension and memory. In: Lin, Y.-C., Kang, S.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, pp. 451–459 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oprean, D.: Understanding the immersive experience: examining the influence of visual immersiveness and interactivity on spatial experiences and understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Balakrishnan, B., Sundar, S.S.: Where am I? How can I get there? Impact of navigability and narrative transportation on spatial presence. Hum. Comput. Interact. 26(3), 161–204 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parush, A., Campbell, C., Hunter, A., Ma, C., Calder, L., Worthington, J., Abbott, C., Frank, J.R.: Situational Awareness and Patient Safety. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dunston, P.S., Arns, L.L., Mcglothlin, J.D., Lasker, G.C., Kushner, A.G.: An immersive virtual reality mock-up for design review of hospital patient rooms. In: Wang, X., Tsai, J.J.-H. (eds.) Collaborative Design in Virtual Environments. ISCA, vol. 48, pp. 167–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peavey, E.K., Zoss, J., Watkins, N.: Simulation and mock-up research methods to enhance design decision making. Health Environ. Res. Des. J. 5(3), 133–143 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar, S.: Experience-based design review of healthcare facilities using interactive virtual prototypes. Unpublished dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carlson, J.N., Das, S., De la Torre, F., Callaway, C.W., Phrampus, P.E., Hodgins, J.: Motion capture measures variability in laryngoscopic movement during endotracheal intubation: a preliminary report. Simul. Healthc. J. Soc. Simul. Healthc. 7(4), 255–260 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chandrasekharan, B.: Design problem solving: a task analysis. AI Mag. 11(4), 59–71 (1990)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Balakrishnan, B., Kalisperis, L.N.: Design visualization: a media effects approach. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 7(3), 415–427 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bimal Balakrishnan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Loukas Kalisperis
    • 2
  • Danielle Oprean
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.The Pennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations