Skip to main content

Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Biomechanics

  • Chapter
Book cover Musculoskeletal Research and Basic Science

Abstract

Biomechanics is the field of study which applies fundamental principles of mechanics to biological problems. Mass, time, and length are the basic variables of the biomechanics, and they are scalar quantities which can be described by a magnitude. Force and moment are vector quantities that take direction (or line) of action into account in addition to the magnitude. Time rate of change of position is velocity, and time rate of change of velocity is acceleration. Force and moment (torque) are the two important concepts at the basis of biomechanics which give forth to linear and rotational motion, respectively. The magnitude of the forces is equal to mass times acceleration. The magnitude of the moment is equal to the force times its moment arm.

The analyses in biomechanics are based on two broad branches of the mechanics: rigid body mechanics and deformable body mechanics. Statics and dynamics are two sub-branches of rigid body mechanics. When the sum of all the forces and moments acting on a body is zero, the body is said to be in static equilibrium. The equations of static equilibrium are often used to calculate unknown forces and moments acting on a rigid body. Dynamics is divided into two subfields: kinematics and kinetics where kinematics explains the motion in linear (meters) or angular (radians, degrees) units. Kinetics is the analysis of forces and moments which give forth to the motion. Newton’s laws, the work–energy relationship, and the principle of energy conservation can be used to document the relationship between force and motion. Motion in the concept of deformable body mechanics is considered as local changes of the shape within a body (internal movement of the body), called deformations. The focus of deformable body mechanics is to analyze experimentally determined relationships between forces and deformations. Forces and deformations apply to structures such as whole bones or implants. At the material level, load and deformation are required to be normalized by cross-sectional area and length, respectively, to obtain stress and strain. Stress–strain relations reveal material properties such as elastic modulus, resilience, ultimate strength, and toughness. Stress–strain curves provide information about the resistance of the material to fracture at a single loading episode, such as trauma. On the other hand, repeated low level of stress results in failure by fatigue. Material properties of materials are dependent on several factors: their composition, environmental and test conditions, and loading schemes. Biological tissues are viscoelastic materials meaning that their deformation depends on the rate and time of loading. Musculoskeletal tissues are also considered as composite materials meaning that they are composed of at least two different materials. The bone is an example where mineral crystals reinforce a ductile collagen matrix. These tissues are also anisotropic materials meaning that their material properties depend on loading direction. For instance, tendon is the strongest when pulled along its longer axis. Finally, it is essential to determine a safe stress level for a structure in order to account for possible uncertainties in its environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Meriam J, Kraige L (2011) Engineering mechanics: statics, 7/e. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meriam JL, Kraige LG (2012) Engineering mechanics: dynamics (vol 2), 7/e. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drillis R, Contini R (1966) Body segment parameters. New York University, School of Engineering and Science, Research Division, New york

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tözeren A (2000) Human body dynamics: classical mechanics and human movement. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fung Y, Cowin S (1994) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. J Appl Mech 61:1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartel DL, Davy DT, Keaveny TM (2006) Orthopaedic biomechanics: mechanics and design in musculoskeletal systems. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seeman E, Delmas PD (2006) Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. New Engl J Med 354(21):2250–2261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ammann P, Rizzoli R (2003) Bone strength and its determinants. Osteoporos Int J Established Result Cooperation Between Eur Found Osteoporos Nat Osteoporos Found USA 14(Suppl 3):S13–S18. doi:10.1007/s00198-002-1345-4

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zioupos P, Currey J (1998) Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. Bone 22(1):57–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rho J-Y, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P (1998) Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 20(2):92–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X, Nyman J, Dong X, Leng H, Reyes M (2010) Fundamental biomechanics in bone tissue engineering. Synth Lect Tissue Eng 2(1):1–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sedlin ED, Hirsch C (1966) Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. Acta Orthop 37(1):29–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nyman JS, Roy A, Shen X, Acuna RL, Tyler JH, Wang X (2006) The influence of water removal on the strength and toughness of cortical bone. J Biomech 39(5):931–938. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lucas GL, Cooke FW, Friis E (1999) A primer of biomechanics. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Burstein AH, Wright TM (1994) Fundamentals of orthopaedic biomechanics. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  16. Özkaya N, Nordin M, Goldsheyder D, Leger D (2012) Fundamentals of biomechanics: equilibrium, motion, and deformation. Springer, New york

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Ünal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ünal, M., Akkuş, O., Marcus, R.E. (2016). Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Biomechanics. In: Korkusuz, F. (eds) Musculoskeletal Research and Basic Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20777-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20777-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20776-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20777-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics