Advertisement

A Systematic Analysis of Benefits and Costs of Projects for the Valorization of Cultural Heritage

  • Francesco TajaniEmail author
  • Pierluigi Morano
Chapter
  • 467 Downloads
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)

Abstract

In the selection phase of the projects to be implemented through the support of EU funding, different solutions are frequently evaluated by the decision-maker through cost benefit analysis. This chapter explores some methodological and operational aspects of this valuation technique with specific reference to initiatives aimed at enhancing the cultural heritage in historical centers. Therefore, the preparatory phase to the implementation of cost–benefit analysis is discussed in terms of identification of the economic impacts (positive and negative) generated by projects for the valorization of cultural resources; at the same time, the procedures best suited for the estimation of the input and output terms ordinarily connected with the interventions on historical and architectural heritage are classified and explained. The study developed represents useful technical support for operators who are preparing to plan and evaluate interventions for the redevelopment of cultural heritage.

Keywords

Cost benefit analysis Cultural heritage Valorization projects Deadweight effect Opportunity cost Willingness to pay 

References

  1. Baez A, Herrero LC (2012) Using contingent valuation and cost benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage. J Cultural Herit 13(3):235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedate A, Herrero LC, Sanz JA (2004) Economic valuation of the cultural heritage: application to four case studies in Spain. J Cultural Herit 5:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brancati R (2001) Analisi e metodologie per la valutazione delle politiche industriali. Collana Associazione Italiana di Valutazione. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  4. Del Saz Salazar S, Montagud Marques J (2005) Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring an old Arab tower. J Cultural Herit 6(1):69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dziembowska J, Funck R (2000) Cultural activities as a location factor in European competition between regions: concepts and some evidence. Ann Reg Sci 34:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Environment Agency (2010) The European Environment. State and Outlook 2010, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  7. European Union. Regional Policy (2008) Gu to Cost Benefit Analysis of Investment projectsGoogle Scholar
  8. FORMEZ (1992) Economia dei beni culturali. Programmazione e valutazione dell’intervento pubblico per progetti. Quaderni Regionali, NapoliGoogle Scholar
  9. Giddings B, Hopwood B, O’brien G (2002) Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain Dev 10(4):187–196Google Scholar
  10. Guha S (2009) Motivational push factors for visiting reenactment sites, Master thesis 3704, San Jose State University. Retrieved 4 June 2012Google Scholar
  11. Herrero LC (1997) Economía de la Cultura y el Ocio. Nuevas posibilidades para la Política Económica Regional, Mercurio. Revista de Economía y Empresa 1:101–118Google Scholar
  12. Houghton RA, Goodale CL (2004) Effects of land-change on the carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems. Ecosyst Land Use Change Geophys Monogr Ser 153:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirkpatrick CH, MacArthur JD (1990) Shadow pricing unemployed labour in developed economies: an approach to estimation. Project Apprais 5(2):101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lenihan H (2003) Estimating Deadweight and Displacement in Enterprise Ireland Assisted Companies using two Methodological Approaches. In: Paper presented at the 43rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Jyvaskyla, Finland, 27–30 August 2003Google Scholar
  15. Lorencovà E, Frelichovà J, Nelson E, Vackà D (2012) Past and future impacts of land use and climate change on agricultural ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishan EJ (1974) L’Analisi Costi–Benefici. ETAS libriGoogle Scholar
  17. Morano P, Tajani F (2013) Bare ownership evaluation. Hedonic price model vs. Artificial neural network. Int J Bus Intell Data Mining 8(4):340–362Google Scholar
  18. Navrud S, Ready RC (2002) Valuing cultural heritage. Applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Edward Elgar Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Nuti F (1984) L’analisi costi-benefici. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  20. Pearce D (1998) Cost benefit analysis and environmental policy. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 14(4):84–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pennisi G, Scandizzo PL (2003) Valutare l’incertezza. L’analisi costi benefici nel XXI secolo. Giappichelli Editore, TorinoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science of Civil Engineering and ArchitecturePolytechnic University of Bari (Italy)BariItaly

Personalised recommendations