Skip to main content

Engineering Mechanical, Biochemical, and Topographical Niche Cues by Photocrosslinkable, Microribbon-Like Hydrogels

  • Chapter
Microscale Technologies for Cell Engineering
  • 1308 Accesses

Abstract

Extracellular matrix (ECM) influences cell fates via various kinds of ECM properties, including biochemical cues, microarchitectures, and matrix stiffness. Tissue engineering scaffolds have been created to approach the optimal ECM properties for desired cell behaviors, or to provide a biomaterials library to help understand how combinatorial effects of ECM properties affect cell fates and tissue formation. Given that cells often respond to the environments in a complex and unpredictable manner, scaffolds with easily tunable biochemical and biophysical properties are highly desirable. Current tissue engineering scaffolds, such as hydrogels and prefabricated bio-architectures, often provide limited tunability due to intertwined niche properties, lack of macroporosity, or the difficulty to reach uniform cell distribution. To overcome such limitations, we created microribbon-like, crosslinkable hydrogels as a new generation of scaffolding materials. Gelatin-based microribbons provide independently tunable macroporosity and matrix stiffness, as gelatin-based biochemical ligands promote cell adhesion and proliferation. PEG-based microribbons enable the independent control of macroporosity, matrix stiffness, and biochemical cues. Both types of microribbons support direct cell encapsulation in 3D, and allow uniform cell distribution with desired cell density, which facilitate the control of cell-cell interaction and rate of ECM production. The resulting macroporous scaffolds influence cell morphology and cell proliferation via independently tunable matrix stiffness, biochemical ligands, and macroporosity. The microribbons are highly versatile; in addition to controlling cell behaviors and tissue regeneration, these ribbon-like building blocks can be used as a biomaterials library to help elucidate the complex interactions between cell fates and ECM properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

3D:

Three-dimensional

ADSC:

Adipose-derived stromal cells

CRGDS:

Cysteine-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine

Cys:

Cysteine

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

LAP:

Lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PEG:

Poly(ethylene glycol)

TAEA:

Tris(2-aminoethyl) amine

References

  1. Burdick JA, Vunjak-Novakovic G (2009) Engineered microenvironments for controlled stem cell differentiation. Tissue Eng Part A 15:205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scadden DT (2006) The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature 441:1075–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Underhill GH, Bhatia SN (2007) High-throughput analysis of signals regulating stem cell fate and function. Curr Opin Chem Biol 11:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benoit DS, Schwartz MP, Durney AR et al (2008) Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Mater 7:816–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR et al (2001) Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294:1708–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deforest CA, Polizzotti BD, Anseth KS (2009) Sequential click reactions for synthesizing and patterning three-dimensional cell microenvironments. Nat Mater 8:659–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deforest CA, Sims EA, Anseth KS (2010) Peptide-functionalized click hydrogels with independently tunable mechanics and chemical functionality for 3D cell culture. Chem Mater 22:4783–4790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA (2005) Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 23:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nii M, Lai JH, Keeney M et al (2013) The effects of interactive mechanical and biochemical niche signaling on osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells using combinatorial hydrogels. Acta Biomater 9:5475–5483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM (2009) Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 8:457–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benton JA, Fairbanks BD, Anseth KS (2009) Characterization of valvular interstitial cell function in three dimensional matrix metalloproteinase degradable PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials 30:6593–6603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Flaim CJ, Chien S, Bhatia SN (2005) An extracellular matrix microarray for probing cellular differentiation. Nat Methods 2:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mosiewicz KA, Johnsson K, Lutolf MP (2010) Phosphopantetheinyl transferase-catalyzed formation of bioactive hydrogels for tissue engineering. J Am Chem Soc 132:5972–5974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H et al (2010) Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 31:5536–5544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fozdar DY, Soman P, Lee JW et al (2011) Three-dimensional polymer constructs exhibiting a tunable negative Poisson’s ratio. Adv Funct Mater 21:2712–2720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hollister SJ (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4:518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mondrinos MJ, Dembzynski R, Lu L et al (2006) Porogen-based solid freeform fabrication of polycaprolactone-calcium phosphate scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:4399–4408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rumpler M, Woesz A, Dunlop JWC et al (2008) The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth. J R Soc Interface 5:1173–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun T, Donoghue PS, Higginson JR et al (2011) The interactions of astrocytes and fibroblasts with defined pore structures in static and perfusion cultures. Biomaterials 32:2021–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bian W, Liau B, Badie N et al (2009) Mesoscopic hydrogel molding to control the 3D geometry of bioartificial muscle tissues. Nat Protoc 4:1522–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chew SY, Mi R, Hoke A et al (2007) Aligned protein-polymer composite fibers enhance nerve regeneration: a potential tissue-engineering platform. Adv Funct Mater 17:1288–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rnjak-Kovacina J, Wise SG, Li Z et al (2011) Tailoring the porosity and pore size of electrospun synthetic human elastin scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32:6729–6736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanz-Herrera JA, Moreo P, Garcia-Aznar JM et al (2009) On the effect of substrate curvature on cell mechanics. Biomaterials 30:6674–6686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meli L, Jordan ET, Clark DS et al (2012) Influence of a three-dimensional, microarray environment on human cell culture in drug screening systems. Biomaterials 33:9087–9096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao J, Duan H, Liu Z et al (2011) Construction of the recellularized corneal stroma using porous acellular corneal scaffold. Biomaterials 32:6962–6971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han L-H, Yu S, Wang T et al (2013) Microribbon-like elastomers for fabricating macroporous and highly flexible scaffolds that support cell proliferation in 3D. Adv Funct Mater 23:346–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Han LH, Tong X, Yang F (2014) Photo-crosslinkable PEG-based microribbons for forming 3D macroporous scaffolds with decoupled niche properties. Adv Mater 26:1757–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ovsianikov A, Deiwick A, Van Vlierberghe S et al (2011) Laser fabrication of three-dimensional CAD scaffolds from photosensitive gelatin for applications in tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 12:851–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, De Rooze N et al (2000) Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 1:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang H, Hansen MB, Lowik DW et al (2011) Oppositely charged gelatin nanospheres as building blocks for injectable and biodegradable gels. Adv Mater 23:H119–H124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Callister WD (2007) Materials science and engineering: an introduction. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KE et al (2010) Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329:1078–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bertz A, Wohl-Bruhn S, Miethe S et al (2013) Encapsulation of proteins in hydrogel carrier systems for controlled drug delivery: influence of network structure and drug size on release rate. J Biotechnol 163:243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu J (2010) Bioactive modification of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:4639–4656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Phelps EA, Enemchukwu NO, Fiore VF et al (2012) Maleimide cross-linked bioactive PEG hydrogel exhibits improved reaction kinetics and cross-linking for cell encapsulation and in situ delivery. Adv Mater 24(64–70):62

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fairbanks BD, Schwartz MP, Bowman CN et al (2009) Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 30:6702–6707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Luo Y, Shoichet MS (2004) A photolabile hydrogel for guided three-dimensional cell growth and migration. Nat Mater 3:249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our works have been supported by Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Foundation, McCormick Faculty Award, Stanford Bio-X Interdisciplinary Initiative grant, Basil O’ Connor Starter Scholar Research Award from the March of Dimes Foundation, and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (Grant #TR3-05569). The author especially likes to thank Professor Fan Yang at Stanford University for the advice and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Hsin Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Han, LH. (2016). Engineering Mechanical, Biochemical, and Topographical Niche Cues by Photocrosslinkable, Microribbon-Like Hydrogels. In: Singh, A., Gaharwar, A. (eds) Microscale Technologies for Cell Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20726-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20726-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20725-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20726-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics