Abstract
Thus far we have focused on biomedical research, which is usually conducted in the medical school or hospital. In this chapter, we move down the street to the university.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Sociological Association. American sociological association code of ethics. http://www.asanet.org/about/ethics.cfm (1999). Accessed June 8 2014.
Aronson E. Not by chance alone: my life as a social psychologist. New York: Basic Books; 2010.
Baumrind D. Some thoughts on ethics of research: after reading Milgram’s “behavioral study of obedience”. Am Psychol. 1964;19(6):421.
Becker HS. Sociological work: method and substance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books; 1970.
Calvey D. The art and politics of covert research: doing situated ethics in the field. Sociology. 2008;42(5):905–18.
Carlson EB, Newman E, Daniels JW, Armstrong J, Roth D, Loewenstein R. Distress in response to and perceived usefulness of trauma research interviews. J Trauma Dissociation. 2003;4(2):131–42.
Ceci SJ, Peters D, Plotkin J. Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. Am Psychol. 1985;40(9):994.
Davidson J. Covert research. In: Jupp V, editor. SAGE dictionary of social research methods. London: Sage; 2006. p. 48–9.
Feeley MM. Legality, social research, and the challenge of institutional review boards. Law Soc Rev. 2007;41(4):757–76.
Fleischman A, Levine C, Eckenwiler L, Grady C, Hammerschmidt DE, Sugarman J. Dealing with the long-term social implications of research. Am J Bioeth. 2011;11(5):5–9.
Galliher JF. The protection of human subjects: a reexamination of the professional code of ethics. Am Sociol. 1973;8:93–100.
Hamburger P. Getting permission. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2007;101(2):405–92.
Homan R. The ethics of covert methods. Br J Sociol. 1980;31(1):46–59.
Homan R. The ethics of social research. London; New York: Longman; 1991.
Kalven Committee. Report on the university’s role in political and social action. 1967. http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/kalvenreport.pdf. Accessed February 7 2015.
Katz J. Toward a natural history of ethical censorship. Law Soc Rev. 2007;41(4):797–810.
Klitzman RL. How IRBs view and make decisions about social risks. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013;8(3):58–65.
Lindgren J, Murashko D, Ford MR. Foreword: Symposium on censorship and institutional review boards. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2007;101(2):399.
Mazur DJ. Evaluating the science and ethics of research on humans: a guide for IRB members. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.
Meyer MN. Three challenges for risk-based (research) regulation: heterogeneity among regulated activities, regulator bias, and stakeholder heterogeneity. In: Cohen IG, Lynch HF, editors. Human subjects research regulation: perspectives on the future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2014. p. 313–26.
Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1963;67(4):371.
Moss J. If institutional review boards were declared unconstitutional, they would have to be reinvented. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2007;101(2):801–8.
Newman E, Kaloupek DG. The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. J Trauma Stress. 2004;17(5):383–94.
Office of the Secretary, HHS, and the Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM): Human subjects research protections: Enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. 76 FR 44512-44531 (July 26, 2011).
Pager D. The mark of a criminal record. Am J Sociol. 2003;108(5):937–75.
Pool IS. The new censorship of social science research. Public Interest. 1980;59:57–66.
Saltman J. Housing discrimination: policy research, methods and results. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1979;441(1):186–96.
Schrag ZM. Ethical imperialism: institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965–2009. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2010.
Sieber JE, Tolich MB. Planning ethically responsible research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2013.
Stark L. Morality in science: how research is evaluated in the age of human subjects regulation [PhD dissertation]. Princeton University; 2006
Stark L. Behind closed doors: IRBs and the making of ethical research. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press; 2012.
Van den Hoonaard WC. Walking the tightrope: ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press; 2002.
Van den Hoonaard WC. The seduction of ethics: transforming the social sciences. Toronto; Buffalo (NY): University of Toronto Press; 2011.
Van den Hoonaard WC, editor. Ethics rupture. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press; 2016.
Weinstein J. Institutional review boards and the constitution. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2007;101(2):493–562.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Whitney, S.N. (2016). The Social Sciences. In: Balanced Ethics Review. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20705-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20705-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20704-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20705-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)