Advertisement

An Integrated Playful Music Learning Solution

  • Kristoffer JensenEmail author
  • Søren Frimodt-Møller
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9177)

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated solution using IT technologies to help a (young) musician learn a piece of music, or learn how to play an instrument. The rehearsal process is organized in sequences, consisting of various activities to be ‘passed’. Several games are investigated that help in learning especially difficult parts, or in the learning of an instrument. The integrated solution, demonstrated on a tablet, proposed in this paper also includes tools that assist the musician in the rehearsal process. Feedback consists of computer tracking that supports self-assessment of rehearsal quality together with shared audio and video material that can be viewed by teacher and peers.

Keywords

Informal learning Music rehearsal Mobile applications Gamification Low-fidelity prototyping 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anaïs Tournois, Tessa Guérin, Nicholas Fruy, Hajar Akla, Hajar El Hammoumi, Thibaut Grandin, Brice Freund as well as the participants in the development of earlier prototypes for their participation in this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Price, S., Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Stanton, D., Neale, H.: Using tangible to promote novels forms of playful learning. Interact Comput. 15, 169–185 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Price, S., Rogers, Y.: Let’s get physical: the learning benefits of interacting in digitally in augmented physical spaces. Comput. Educ. 43, 137–151 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gaunt, H.: One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: the perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychol. Music 36(2), 215–245 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurkul, W.W.: Nonverbal communication in one-to-one music performance instruction. Psychol. Music 35(2), 327–362 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Austin, J.R., Berg, M.H.: Exploring music practice among sixth-grade band and orchestra students. Psychol. Music 34(4), 535–558 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rostvall, A.L., West, T.: Interaktion och kunskapsutveckling. En studie av frivillig musikundervisning. KMH förlaget, Stockholm (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McPherson, G.E., McCormick, J.: Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychol. Music 34(3), 291–309 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seddon, F.A., O’Neill, S.A.: How does formal instrumental music tuition (FIMT) impact on self- and teacher-evaluations of adolescents computer-based compositions? Psychol. Music 34(1), 27–45 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McPherson, G.E.: From child to musician: skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychol. Music 33(1), 5–35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bateson, G.: Steps to an ecology of mind. Jason Aronson Inc., Northvale (1972)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vygotsky, L.: Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Apter, M.: Reversal Theory: The Dynamics of Motivation, Emotion and Personality. Oneworld Publications, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marchetti, E., Jensen, K., Valente, A.: Transposition of Domain Knowledge into Educational Games. Int. J. Technol. Knowl. Soc. 9(4), 273–288 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garageband (2015). https://www.apple.com/mac/garageband/ Accessed on 4 February 2015
  15. 15.
    Tunemio (2015). https://itunes.apple.com/fi/app/id849934448 Accessed on 4 February 2015
  16. 16.
    Indabamusic (2015). https://www.indabamusic.com Accessed on 4 February 2015
  17. 17.
    Kompoz (2015). http://www.kompoz.com Accessed on 4 February 2015
  18. 18.
    Soundcloud (2015). http://www.soundcloud.com Accessed on 4 February 2015
  19. 19.
    Wholeworldband (2015). http://www.wholeworldband.com Accessed on February 4, 2015
  20. 20.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play. Game Design Fundamentals. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eclipse (2015). https://eclipse.org/ Accessed on 5 February 2015
  22. 22.
    Agile Manifesto (2015). http://agilemanifesto.org/iso/en/principles.html Accessed on 5 February 2015
  23. 23.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shroff, R.H., Deneen, C.C., Ng, E.M.W.: Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students behavioural intention to use an eportfolio system. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 27(4), 600–618 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38, 475–487 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (2006). Web page summarizing The Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines, Enlarged/Expanded edition. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html Accessed 4 February 2015
  27. 27.
    Sauro, J.: Measuring Usability With The System Usability Scale (SUS) (2011). http://www.measuringu.com/sus.php Accessed on 4 February 2015

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Architecture, Design and Media TechnologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations