Advertisement

Preparing All Students for 21st Century College and Careers

  • Margo IzzoEmail author
  • Alexa Murray
  • Andrew Buck
  • Victor Johnson
  • Eliseo Jimenez
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9177)

Abstract

Preparing all students for lifelong success in a rapidly changing global economy requires schools to reconsider both what and how educators teach and students learn in the 21st century. This paper presents examples of curricula, programs, and delivery methods that promote increased learning in core academics, technology, and life and career skills for students with disabilities at the secondary and postsecondary levels. Three initiatives, EnvisionIT (EIT), Ohio’s STEM Ability Alliance (OSAA), and Transition Options in Postsecondary Settings (TOPS), provide models of engendering 21st century skills utilizing 21st century tools that support all students’ transition from high school to college and careers.

Keywords

21st century skills College and career readiness Employment Students with disabilities Self-advocacy STEM Technology Transition 

References

  1. 1.
    Annie E. Casey Foundation. Counting what counts: Taking results seriously for vulnerable children and families. Author, Baltimore (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benz, M., Yovanoff, P., Doren, B.: School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Except. Child. 63(2), 155–165 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burgstahler, S.: The role of technology in preparing youth with disabilities for postsecondary education and employment. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 18(4) (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burgstahler, S., Comden, D., Lee, S.-M., Arnold, A., Brown, K.: Computer and cell phone access for individuals with mobility impairments: An overview and case studies. NeuroRehabilitation 28, 183–197 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cannella-Malone, H.I., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., de la Cruz, B., Edrisinha, C., Lancioni, G.E.: Comparing video prompting to video modeling for teaching daily living skills to six adults with developmental disabilities. Educat. Training Dev. Disabil. 41, 344–356 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cihak, D., Alberto, P.A., Taber-Doughty, T., Gama, R.I.: A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulations strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabil. 21, 89–99 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cimera, R.: The cost-trends of supported employment versus sheltered employment. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 28, 15–20 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cimera, R.: Supported employment’s cost-efficiency to taxpayers: 2002 to 2007. Res. Pract. Persons Severe Disabil. 34, 13–20 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erickson, W., Lee, C., von Schrader, S.: 2012 Disability Status Report: United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI) (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Furniss, F., Lancioni, G., Rocha, N., Cunha, B., Seedhouse, P., Morato, P., O’Reilly, M.F.: VICAID: Development and evaluation of a palmtop-based job aid for workers with severe developmental disabilities. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 32, 277–287 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodson, J., Sigafoos, J., O-Reilly, M., Canella, H., Lancioni, G.E.: Evaluation of a video-based error correction procedure for teaching a domestic skill to individuals with developmental disabilities. Research Dev. Disabil. 28, 458–467 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grigal, M., Hart, D.: Think College!. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grunwald and Associates: Educators, Technology and 21st Century Skills: Dispelling Five Myths. Walden University, Richard W. Riley College of Education, Minneapolis (2010). www.WaldenU.edu/fivemyths
  14. 14.
    Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire. 2014 Annual Disability Statistics Compendium (2014). http://www.disabilitycompendium.org/docs/default-source/2014-compendium/2014_compendium.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2015
  15. 15.
    Isaakson, C., Burgstahler, S.: AAC, employment, and independent living: A success story. Assistive Technol. Outcomes Benefits 3(1), 67–78 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Izzo, M.V., Lamb, P.: Self-determination and career development: Skills for successful transition to postsecondary education and employment (White Paper) (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Izzo, M.V., Yurick, A., Nagaraja, H.N., Novak, J.A.: Effects of a 21st-century curriculum on students’ information technology and transition skills. Career Dev. Except. Individuals 33, 95–105 (2010). http://cde.sagepub.com/content/33/2/95
  18. 18.
    Van Laarhoven, T., Johnson, J.W., Van Laarhoven-Myers, T., Grider, K.L., Grider, K.M.: The effectiveness of using a video iPod as a prompting device in employment settings. J. Behav. Educat. 18, 119–141 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mechling, L., Gast, D., Seid, N.: Using a Personal Digital Assistant to Increase Independent Task Completion by Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 39(10), 1420–1434 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miller, S.M., Chan, F.: Predictors of life satisfaction in individuals with intellectual disabilities. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 52(12), 1039–1047 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    National Center for Education Statistics. Institutional retention and graduation rates for undergraduate students (2014). http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cva.asp. Accessed 9 March 2015
  22. 22.
    National Center for Education Statistics. Fast facts: students with disabilities (2013). http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=60. Accessed 9 March 2015
  23. 23.
    National Science Foundation. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2015). http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/digest/theme6.cfm. Accessed February 12 2015
  24. 24.
    Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.-M.: The Post-High School Outcomes of Youth with Disabilities up to 4 Years after High School. A Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). SRI International, Menlo Park (2009). www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf
  25. 25.
    Palmer, S.B., Wehmeyer, M.L.: Promoting self-determination in early elementary school: Teaching self-regulated problem-solving and goal-setting skills. Remedial Spec. Educat. 24, 115–126 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Partnership for 21st Century Skills. P21 common core toolkit: A guide to aligning the common core standards with the framework for 21st century skills, Washington, DC (2011). www.p21.org/images/p21/toolkit_final.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2011, February 22
  27. 27.
    Rogan, P., Rinne, S.: National call for organizational change from sheltered to integrated employment. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 49(4), 248–260 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shaw, S.F., Madaus, J.W., Dukes, L.L.: Preparing students with disabilities for college success: A practical guide for transition planning. Brookes, Baltimore (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sitlington, P.L., Neubert, D.A., Begun, W., Lombard, R., Leconte, P.: Assess for success: A Practitioner’s Handbook on Transition assessment, 2nd edn. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tereshko, L., MacDonald, R., Ahearn, W.H.: Strategies for teaching children with autism to imitate response chains using video modeling. Research Autism Spectrum Disord. 4(3), 479–489 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Test, D.W., Aspel, N.P., Everson, J.M.: Transition methods for Youth with Disabilities. Merrill Prentice Hall, Columbus (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Test, D.W., Fowler, C.H., Richter, S., White, J.A., Mazzotti, V.L., Walker, A.R., Kortering, L.: Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Dev. Except. Individuals 32, 115–128 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    U.S. Department of Education. Public high school four-year on-time graduation rates and event dropout rates: school years 2010–11 and 2011–12 (2014). http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014391.pdf. Accessed March 11 2015
  34. 34.
    U.S. Department of Education. Rehabilitation act as amended by WIOA (2014). http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/rehab-act-as-amended-by-wioa.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015
  35. 35.
    U.S. Department of Labor. Persons with a disability: labor force characteristics – 2013 (2014). http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/disabl.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015
  36. 36.
    U.S. Department of Labor. The workforce innovation and opportunity act – July 22 2014 (2014). http://www.doleta.gov/wioa/pdf/WIOA-Factsheet.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015
  37. 37.
    U.S. Government Accountability Office. College completion: Additional efforts could help education with its completion goals (GAO-03-568). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (2003)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N., Levine, P.: After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI International, Menlo Park (2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Williams-Diehm, K.L., Brandes, J.A., Chesnut, P.W., Haring, K.A.: Student and Parent IEP Collaboration: A Comparison across School Settings. Rural Spec. Educat. Q. 33(1), 3–11 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margo Izzo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexa Murray
    • 1
  • Andrew Buck
    • 1
  • Victor Johnson
    • 1
  • Eliseo Jimenez
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations