Criteria for Designing Blended Learning Materials for Inclusive Education: Perspectives of Teachers and Producers

  • Ingo K. BosseEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9177)


Inclusion and learning with media are both global megatrends in 21st century education and both are stimulating profound changes for educational institutions. While there is consensus that media education offers special opportunities for inclusive classrooms, most of the blended learning platforms currently on offer are not accessible to and thus not usable for students with special needs. It is a challenge for both teachers and producers of media based learning materials to meet the needs of all students. The purpose of the exploratory study presented here was to collect qualitative data on the didactical requirements for inclusive learning materials from the perspectives of teachers and producers. The subject of the study was “Planet School”, the most important blended learning platform available for schools in Germany. To include the perspectives of experienced teachers the first research module had a focus on their practical experiences in inclusive classrooms. Based on participatory observation and interviews it was possible to develop recommendations for the design of blended learning materials for inclusive education. The second module focused on the perspectives of the producers. Based on the results of module one the responsible public broadcaster developed criteria for the design of materials, modules, and activities for inclusive education. This article compares the different perspectives. This procedure will lead to the development of a blended learning platform that addresses the needs of different types of learners and offers accessible and usable materials including movies, television broadcasts, and interactive and multimedia content for students with different prerequisites for learning.


E-inclusion Blended learning Broadcasters Inclusive education Inclusive multimedia learning materials 


  1. 1.
    Babel, H., Hackl, B.: Handlungsorientierter unterricht – dirigierter aktionismus oder partizipative kooperation? In: Mayer, O., Treichel, D. (eds.) Handlungsorientiertes Lernen und eLearning: Grundlagen und Praxisbeispiele, pp. 11–35. Oldenbourg, München (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beltran, E.V., Ciges, A.S.: The 21st century languages classroom – the teacher perspektive. In: Beltran, E.V., Abbott, C., Jones, J. (eds.) Inclusive Language Education and Digital Technology, pp. 67–83. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bintinger, G., Wilhelm, M.: Inklusiven Unterricht gestalten: Creating inclusive Education. Behinderte in Familie, Schule und Gesellschaft 24, 51–60 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bönsch, M., Mögeling, K. (eds.): Binnendifferenzierung. Teil 2: Unterrichtsbeispiele für den binnendifferenzierten Unterricht. Prolog-Verlag, Immenhausen bei Kassel (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Booth, T., Ainscow, M.: Index for Inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. CSIE, Bristol (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosse, I.K.: “Planet School”: blended learning for inclusive classrooms. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8548, pp. 366–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosse, I.K.: How to Design Blended Learning Materials for Inclusive Education? An Exploratory Study. In: Hogarth, A. (ed.): Blended Learning: Student Perceptions, Emerging Practices and Novapublishers, New York (2015) (in Press)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edyburn, D.L., Edyburn, K.D.: Tools for Creating Accessible, Tiered, and Multilingual Web-Based Curricula, pp. 1–7. Intervention in School and Clinic, Austin (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feyerer, E., Prammer, W.: Gemeinsamer Unterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: Anregungen für eine integrative Praxis. Beltz, Weinheim (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Florian, L., Hegarty, J.: ICT and Special Educational Needs: A Tool for Inclusion: A Tool for Inclusion. Open University Press, Berkshire (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green, N., Green, K.: Kooperatives LernenimKlassenraum und imKollegium: Das Trainingsbuch (2). Kallmeyer. Velber Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gudjons, H.: Pädagogisches Grundwissen: Überblick - Kompendium – Studienbuch. Klinkhardt, Bad Heilbrunn (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hinz, A., Boban, I.: Der “Index forInclusion” - eine Möglichkeit zur Selbstevaluation von “Schulen für alle”. In: Feuser, G. (ed.) Integration heute - Perspektiven ihrer Weiterentwicklung in Theorie und Praxis, pp. 37–46. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McNaught, A., Featherstone, L.: Alternative Approaches to Alternative Formats – Changing Expectations by Challenging Myths. In: Miesenberger, K., Karshmer, A., Penaz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7382, pp. 43–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Richiger-Näf, B.: ICT und Sonderpädagogik. In: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik 16vol. 6, pp. 6–11 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seitz, S.: Inklusive Didaktik: Die Frage nach dem “Kern der Sache”. Zeitschrift für Inklusion, vol. 1,
  18. 18.
    Traub, S.: Kooperativ lernen. In: Buholzer, A, Kummer, A. (eds.): Alle gleich – alle unterschiedlich! Zum Umgang mit Heterogenität in Schule und Unterricht. pp. 138-150. Klett und Balmer-Verlag, Zug (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    UN – United Nations: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. New York (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    UNESCO: Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. (2009)
  21. 21.
    Wember, F.: Herausforderung Inklusion: Ein präventiv orientiertes Modell schulischen Lernens und vier zentrale Bedingungen inklusiver Unterrichtsentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik 10, 380–387 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wocken, H.: Das Haus der inklusiven Schule: Baustellen – Baupläne – Bausteine. Feldhaus, Hamburg (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Rehabilitation ResearchUniversity of DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations