Advertisement

Effect of Background Viewing on Equilibrium Systems

  • Hiroki TakadaEmail author
  • Yuki Mori
  • Toshitake Miyakoshi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9176)

Abstract

Our previous study indicated an increase in the sway values that were observed during peripheral viewing. Especially in the background, there are large differences between human binocular images and artificial stereoscopic images, to which our convergence corresponding to depth cues is not accommodated. This is why equilibrium functions are affected by peripheral viewing. In the present paper, we examine the effect of the exposure to stereoscopic video clips without the background on our equilibrium function. Fifteen healthy young males voluntarily participated and maintained the Romberg posture in stabilometry. Their stabilograms were recorded during monocular vision or binocular parallax vision using semipermeable smart glasses. We also measured the body sway with the subjects’ eyes closed 0–3 min after the exposure to the video clips. A statistical comparison indicated that our equilibrium function is significantly affected by video clips with the background 0–2 min after the exposure to the video clips.

Keywords

Visually-induced motion sickness (VIMS) Stabilometry Stereoscopic video clips Background 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, through a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (Number 26350004).

References

  1. 1.
    Winter, D.A., Patla, A.E., Prince, F., Ishac, M.: Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 1211–1221 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gatev, P., Thomas, S., Kepple, T., Hallett, M.: Feedforward ankle strategy of balance in quiet stance in adults. J. Physiol. 514, 915–928 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loram, D., Kelly, S.M., Laike, M.: Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: is sway size controlled by ankle impedance? J. Physiol. 523, 879–891 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaga, K.: Structure of Vertigo. Kanehara & Co., Ltd., Tokyo, 23–26, 95–100 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Okawa, T., Tokita, T., Shibata, Y., Ogawa, T., Miyata, H.: Stabilometry: significance of locus length per unit area (L/A). Equilib. Res. 54, 283–293 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suzuki, J., Matsunaga, T., Tokumatsu, K., Taguchi, K., Watanabe, I.: Q & A and a manual in stabilometry. Equilib. Res. 55, 64–77 (1996). (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldie, P.A., Bach, T.M., Evans, O.M.: Force platform measures for evaluating postural control: reliability and validity. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 70, 510–517 (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takada, H., Kitaoka, Y., Shimizu, Y.: Mathematicha index and model in stabilometry. Forma 16, 17–46 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fukui, Y., Mori, Y., Kinoshita, F., Takada, H.: A study of body sway on slopes with tilt angles of 10° and 20°. IEICE Technical report 114 (361), 7–10 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ukai, K., Howarth, P.A.: Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images. Displays 29, 106–116 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3, 203–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holomes, S.R., Griffin, M.J.: Correlation between heart rate and the severity of motion sickness caused by optokinetic stimulation. J. Psychophysiol. 15, 35–42 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Himi, N., Koga, T., Nakamura, E., Kobashi, M., Yamane, M., Tsujioka, K.: Differences in autonomic responses between subjects with and without nausea while watching an irregularly oscillating video. Auton. Neurosci. Basic Clin. 116, 46–53 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yokota, Y., Aoki, M., Mizuta, K.: Motion sickness susceptibility associated with visually induced postural instability and cardiac autonomic responses in healthy subjects. Acta Otolaryngol. 125, 280–285 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scibora, L. M., Villard, S., Bardy, B., Stoffregen, T. A.: Wider stance reduces body sway and motion sickness. In: Proceedings of VIMS, pp. 18–23 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takada, M., Fukui, Y., Matsuura, Y., Sato, M., Takada, H.: Peripheral viewing during exposure to a 2D/3D video clip: effects on the human body. Environ. Health Prev. Med. (2014). doi: 10.1007/s12199-014-0424-4 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Takada, M., Miyao, M., Takada, H.: Subjective evaluation of peripheral viewing during exposure to a 2D/3D video clip. In: Proceedings of IEEE VR (2015) (to appear)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takada, H., Kitaoka, Y., Ichikawa, M., Miyao, M.: Physical meaning on geometrical index for stabilometry. Equilib. Res. 62, 168–180 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newell, K.M., Slobounov, S.M., Slobounova, E.S., Molenaar, P.C.: Stochastic processes in postural center of pressure profiles. Exp. Brain Res. 113, 158–164 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Collins, J.J., De Luca, C.J.: Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center of pressure trajectories. Exp. Brain Res. 95, 308–318 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human and Artificial Intelligent Systems Graduate School of EngineeringUniversity of FukuiFukuiJapan

Personalised recommendations