Advertisement

Improving Accessibility Design on Touchscreens

  • Shuang XuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9176)

Abstract

Touchscreen interfaces present critical accessibility concerns because they do not offer tactile cues for the visually impaired users to distinguish interaction controls. The recent advancement of interaction technology makes new design solutions possible. This research examines blind users’ performance and perception of gesture and auditory feedback designs. Findings from this three-phase study indicate that pressing is the most accurate and slightly faster selection gesture, as compared to lifting finger, tapping, or double tapping on the screen. 12 blind participants were able to navigate touchscreens as first-timer users, if facilitated with instant auditory feedback. For text entry tasks, blind users need more advanced assistive tools such as speech recognition. Design guidelines to improve accessibility on touchscreens are discussed in this paper.

Keywords

Accessibility Touch interaction Gesture Auditory feedback 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. New Estimates of Visual Impairment and Blindness (2010). http://www.who.int/blindness/estimates2011.pdf
  2. 2.
    Taking Touch Screen Interfaces into a New Dimension. http://www.tactustechnology.com
  3. 3.
    Neonode Technology. http://www.neonode.com
  4. 4.
    Vidal, S., Lefebvre, G.: Gesture based interaction for visually-impaired people. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI 2010, pp. 809–812. ACM Press, NewYork (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frey, B., Southern, C., Romero, M.: BrailleTouch: mobile texting for the visually impaired. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part III, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6767, pp. 19–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azenkot, S., Lee, N.L.: Exploring the use of speech input by blind people on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of SIGASSETS 2013, Article No. 11, ACM Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mascetti, S., Bernareggi, C., Belotti, M.: TypeInBraille: quick eyes-free typing on smartphones. In: Miesenberger, K., Karshmer, A., Penaz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7383, pp. 615–622. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fewer Blind Americans Learning to Use Braille. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29882719
  9. 9.
    Oliveira, J., Guerreiro, T., Nicolau, H., Jorge, J., Goncalves, D.: Blind people and mobile touch-based text-entry: acknowledging the need for different flavors. In: Proceedings of ASSETS 2011, pp. 179–186. ACM Press, NewYork (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kane, S.K., Morris, M.R., Wobbrock, J.O.: Touchplates: low-cost tactile overlays for visually impaired touch screen users. In: Proceedings of ASSET 2013, Article No. 22, ACM Press, NewYork (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jansen, Y., Karrer, T., Borchers, J.: MudPad: tactile feedback and haptic texture overlay for touch surfaces. In: Proceedings of ITS 2010, pp. 11–14. ACM Press, Saarbrucken (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boron, K., Bratek, P., Kos, A.: Graphical touch screen of thermal signs for the blind people – clinic tests. Microelectron. Int. 24(2), 23–27 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrison, C., Hudson, S.E.: Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. In: Proceedings of CHI 2009, pp. 299–308. ACM Press, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kane, S.K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J.O., Ladner, R.E.: Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. In: Proceedings of ASSETS 2009, pp. 115–122. ACM Press, NewYork (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kane, S.K., Wobbrock, J.O., Ladner, R.E.: Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 413–422. ACM Press, NewYork (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lexmark International, Inc.LexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations