Advertisement

Improving Touchscreen Accessibility in Self-Service Technology

  • Elina JokisuuEmail author
  • Mike McKenna
  • Andrew W. D. Smith
  • Phil Day
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9176)

Abstract

There is a growing trend towards touchscreens in self-service terminals, such as ATMs and airport check-ins. However, these touchscreen-based interfaces pose significant accessibility challenges, particularly for people with visual impairment. This paper presents two research and development projects aimed at improving touchscreen accessibility of self-service technology: one describing the development of a physical input device and another investigating gesture-based input techniques. These two projects are used to illustrate the key challenges of accessibility in self-service technology.

Keywords

Self-service technology SST Touchscreen Accessibility Visual impairment 

References

  1. 1.
    Digital Trends European McDonald’s to replace human cashiers with touch screen computers (2011). <http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/european-mcdonalds-to-replace-human-cashiers-with-touch-screen-computers>. (Accessed on 26 February 2015)
  2. 2.
    Penn, S., Berland E.: TouchSystems In Touch Survey (2004). <http://www.elotouch.co.uk/AboutElo/PressReleases/040617.asp>. (Accessed on 26 February 2015)
  3. 3.
    Castro, D., Atkinson, R., Ezell, S.: Embracing the Self-Service Economy. ITIF The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    James, B., Dunne, G., Peter, A., Glynn, W.J.: Handbook of Services Marketing and Management, pp. 89–101. SAGE Publications, Inc (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Department of Justice 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, 15 September 2010, as referenced in Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–336, 104 Stat. 328 (2010). <http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstandards.htm>. (Accessed on 26 February 2015)
  6. 6.
    PCI Security Standards Council Payment Card Industry PIN Transaction Security Point of Interaction Security Requirements v4.0. PCI Security Standards Council LLC, June 2013Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Summerskill, S.J., Marshall, R., Case, K., Gyi, D.E., Sims, R.E., Day, P.N., Rohan, C., Birnie, S.: Validation of the HADRIAN system using an ATM evaluation case study. Int. J. Hum. Factors Model. Simul. (IJHFMS) 1(4), 420–432 (2010). Special Issue on Application of Digital Human Modelling Tools in User Centred Design ProcessesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Day, P.N., Chandler, E., Colley, A., Carlisle, M., Riley, C., Rohan, C., Tyler, S.: The universal navigator: a proposed accessible alternative to touchscreens for self-service. In: Anderson, M. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2012, pp. 31–38. Taylor and Francis, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Day, P.N., Carlisle, M., Chandler, E., Ferguson, G.: Evaluating the Universal Navigator with blind and partially sighted consumers In: Anderson, M. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2013, Proceedings of the International Conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors 2013, Cambridge, UK, 15–18 April 2013, pp. 355–362. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Day, P.N., Johnson, J.P., Carlisle, M., Ferguson, G.: Evaluating the Universal Navigator with consumers with reduced mobility, dexterity & visual acuity In: Sharples, S., Shorrock, S.T. (eds.) Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2014, pp. 183–190. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elina Jokisuu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mike McKenna
    • 1
  • Andrew W. D. Smith
    • 1
  • Phil Day
    • 1
  1. 1.Consumer Experience, NCR CorporationDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations