Skip to main content

Third Movement. The Ultimate Optimism: Finitics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 614 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Evolutionary Biology ((BRIEFSEVOLUTION))

Abstract

The evolutionary success of the human species, made possible by the evolution of artifacts, has been the source of a creed in human endless perfectability, which is, in the present times, promulgated by various brands of neo-Enlighteners and technooptimists. However, the lifespan and eventual extinction of any biological species is limited and determined by specific constraints, which have been metaphorically dubbed as the “piles of  Rialto” (in analogy with the “spandrels of San Marco”). On the constant and unmovable “piles of Rialto” of human nature, with a restricted carrying capacity, the Rialto bridge of human action had been laid down. Artifaction and hedonotaxis have consecutively erected a huge superstructure that weighs heavily upon the piles and may have reached  its maximum indicating that humankind has entered its ultimate, pre-extinction age. Evolution of artifacts has no ceiling, no limits, and humans apparently have no means of how to curb it. “Makeability,” which may be boundless, does not equal “manageability.” There is no longer the self-preservation, maintaining the permanence of the species, but the hunt for pleasure that seems to determine the evolutionary dynamics of the human species. Artificial pleasures, provided by living in virtual world, and ending in virtual bliss appear to be options the mildest of all; far from the apocalypse of a global nuclear war, of a technological disaster caused by breaking down critical hubs in global networks, of destructions of littoral megacities by rising oceans and worldwide hunger owing to dramatic climate changes, of a violent crushing of civilization by invading the developed countries by mass immigrants from underdeveloped countries, of establishing a world dictatorship, of enslaving humans and eliminating them by intelligent robots. Intellectuals, scientists at a par with artists, should participate in creating “music for the fireworks” in order to make the closing phase of human evolution sublime and passable with minimum political and social tensions. Some fundamental tenets of the Western thought should be reconsidered. Species extinction should be taken as the fact of evolution and faith in the unlimited power of human reason and illusions about eternity and immortality abandoned. It is temporariness, which bestows upon human life its value and meaning, that should become the foundation stone of a new supreme and optimistic humanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The power of computers is best illustrated by this passage from an article of Dooling (2008): “When Treasury Secretary Paulson (looking very much like a frightened primate) came to Congress seeking an emergency loan, Senator Jon Tester of Montana, a Democrat still living on his family homestead, asked him: ‘I’m a dirt farmer. Why do we have one week to determine that $700 billion has to be appropriated or this country’s financial system goes down the pipes?’ ‘Well, sir,’ Mr. Paulson could well have responded, ‘the computers have demanded it.’”

  2. 2.

    David Brin proposed to call the Fermi paradox the “paradox of the Great Silence”. Many writings on the Fermi paradox, Fermi’s paradox, Fermi’s question, and so on, are available. Here are just three of them Webb (2002), Jones (1985), Dick (2001).

References

  • Augustine N (1998) What we don’t know does hurt us. How scientific illiteracy hobbles society. Science 27:1640–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn JD (ed) (1991) Time-based competition. Irvin, Boston MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N (2003) Are you living in a simulation? Philos Quart 53:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N (2004) The future of human evolution. In: Tandy C (ed) Death and anti-death: two hundred years after Kant, fifty years after Turing. Ria University Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaisson EJ (2001) Cosmic evolution: the rise of complexity in nature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris S (2003) Life’s solution: inevitable humans in a lonely universe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi B, Summers K, Dorus S (2007) Adaptive evolution of genes underlying schizophrenia. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:2801–2810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies P (1995) Are we alone? Orion, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (2013) An appetite for wonder: the making of a scientist. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton MJ, Dearden PK, Sowervy SP (2003) Physical law not natural selection as the major determinant of biological complexity in the subcellular realm: new support for the pre-Darwinian conception of evolution by natural law. BioSystems 71:297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dick SJ (2001) Life on other worlds: the 20th-century extraterrestrial life debate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dooling R (2008) The rise of the machines. The New York Times, Oct 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubos RJ (1957) Humanizing the earth. Science 179:769–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson F (2007) Our biotech future. New York Rev Books 54(12)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M, Winkler R (1975) Das Spiel: Naturgesetze steuren den Zufall. Piper, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner H (1985) The mind’s new science. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin B (1995) Discussion. In: Brockman J (ed) The third culture: beyond the scientific revolution. Simon & Schuster, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1996) Life’s grandeur. Cape, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg DS (2001) Science, money and politics. Political triumph and ethical erosion. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan A (2013) The map and the territory: risk, human nature, and the future of forecasting. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken H, Knyazeva H (2000) Arbitrariness in nature: synergetics and evolutionary laws of prohibition. J Gen Philos Sci 31:57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1932) Possible worlds and other essays. Chatto and Windus, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1963) Biological possibilities for the human species in the next ten thousand years. In: Wolstenholme G (ed) Man and his future. Little, Brown & Co, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson R (1998) The great filter—are we almost past it? (http://hanson.gmu.edu/greatfilter.html)

  • Hayek FA (1988) The fatal conceit. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens C (2007) God is not great: how religion poisons everything. Twelve/Warner Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan J (1996) The end of science: facing the limits of knowledge in the twilight of the scientific age. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JJ (2008) Back to the future. EMBO Rep 9(Suppl):59–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunout P, Le Gall D, Shea B (2003) The destruction of society. Challenging the “modern” tryptique: indivdiualism, hedonism, consumerism. Int Scope Rev 5(Issue 9) (Summer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (1947) The uniqueness of man. Man in the modern world. Mentor, New York, pp 2–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes ET (2003) Probability theory: the logic of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones E (1985) Fermi’s question. In: Finney BR, Jones EM (eds) Interstellar migration and the human experience. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacser H, Beeby R (1984) Evolution of catalytic proteins. J Mol Evol 20:38–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly K (1994) Out of control: the new biology of machines, economic and social systems. Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kováč L (2002) Natural history of communism. I. Pliability of human beings and immutability of human nature. II. Autonomous dynamics of memes and institutions. Central Eur Polit Sci Rev 3:74–110, 111–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Kováč L (2010) Darwin and Dostoyevsky: twins. EMBO Rep 11:815

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss LM, Starkman GD (2000) Life, the universe, and nothing: life and death in an ever-expanding universe. Astrophys J 531:22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil R (1999) The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. Viking Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K (1966) On aggression. Methuen, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock J (1995) Ages of Gaia. Oxford Univerity Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock J (2006) The revenge of Gaia: why the earth is figting back—and how we can still save humanity. Allen Lane, London  UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock James (2009) The vanishing face of Gaia: a final warning: enjoy it while you can. Allen Lane, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani K (2013) The great convergence: Asia, the west, and the logic of one world. PublicAffairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1998) An attempt to link sciences and humanities. Sci Amer 278(6):97–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar PB (1973) Technology and evolution. The Frank Nelson Doubleday Lectures, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod J (1970) Le hasard et la nécessité. Édition du Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroz LL (2012) Phylogenomics meets neuroscience: how many times might complex brains have evolved? Acta Biol Hung 63(Suppl 2):3–19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niemitz C (2010) The evolution of the upright posture and gait—a review and a new synthesis. Naturwissenschaften 97:241–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche F (1978) Thus spoke Zarathustra. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagiannis MD (1984) Natural selection of stellar civilizations by the limits of growth. Q J Roy Astronom Soc 25:309–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson I (2008) The future of life. EMBO Rep 9(Suppl):75–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petigura EA, Howard AW, Marcy GW (2013) Prevalence of earth-size planets orbiting sun-like stars. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 110:19273–19278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty T (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Price de Solla DJ (1963) Little science, big science. Columbia Univewrsity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Read LE (1958) I, pencil. The Freeman. Reprinted in: The library of economics and liberty, http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/rdPncl1.html

  • Rees M (2003) Our final century: will the human race survive the twenty-first century?. Heinemann, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson BA (2000) Public beliefs about evolution and creation. http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_publi.htm

  • Rowan-Robinson M (1996) Cosmology, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B (1946) A history of western philosophy. Allen & Unwin, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B (1976) A free man’s worship. In: The collected papers of Bertrand Rusell, vol 12. Routledge, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B (1996) The divorce between science and ‘culture’. An address on receiving the Kalinga prize for the popularization of science at UNESCO headquarters on 24 Jan 1958. UNESCO Courrier 49(2):50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan C (1980) Cosmos. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan C, Newman WI (1983) The solipsist approach to extraterrestrial intelligence. Q J Roy Astronom Soc 24:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklovski IS, Sagan C (1966) Intelligent life in the universe. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart JM (2002) Exploring the mechanisms of universal transcension. J Evol Technol June 2002; http://accelerating.org/articles/Smart

  • Spengler O (1962) The decline of the west. Knopf, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove D (1995) Darwinian fairytales: selfish genes, errors of heredity and other fables of evolution. Encouter Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor H (1998) Large majority of people believe they will go to heaven; only one in fifty thinks they will go to hell. Harris Interactive, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulam S (1958) Tribute to John von Neumann. Bull Am Math Soc 64:1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter JC (2013) Life at the speed of light. From the double helix to the dawn of digital life. Viking Adult, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter C (2004) You, robot. Sci Amer 20 Dec 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb S (2002) If the universe is teeming with aliens … where is everybody? Copernicus Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1979) On human nature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1998) Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (2014) The meaning of human existence. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ladislav Kováč .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kováč, L. (2015). Third Movement. The Ultimate Optimism: Finitics. In: Closing Human Evolution: Life in the Ultimate Age. SpringerBriefs in Evolutionary Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20660-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics