Abstract
It is difficult for readers to fully comprehend the internal and external stakes that were on the table with this evaluation, for the practitioners, the politicians, the programme and the researchers. Practitioners and politicians courted media coverage, and after our first-year report many expected to read about a successful solution to a worrying problem of high reconviction rates for a significant group of offenders. But the government changed (yes, politics does matter). Following this change of government, Diamond took on the additional political weight of proving IOM as a concept and that of the ‘rehabilitation revolution’. There was an additional national IOM (excluding London) external academic evaluation at the time but was only able to explore ‘process’ and not ‘impact’ (Senior et al. 2011). Because we had skillfully negotiated access to data from the inside (and knew the ins and outs, pitfalls and frustrations of managing such data sets), we had information about reconviction of the very sample population that was in the political debate about offending.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Indeed, our Diamond evaluation is still regarded by many as the best IOM research to date and we continue to be invited to speak at the UK and international conferences to share our learning and methodology.
- 2.
Payment by Results was introduced by the UK Government and broadly refers to providers of offender management receiving payment upon meeting demonstratable results based upon proven reoffending.
References
Lum, C. (2014). Policing at a crossroads. Policing, 8(1), 1–4.
Senior, P., Wong, K., Culshaw, A., et al. (2011). Process evaluation of five integrated offender management pioneer areas. London: Ministry of Justice.
Weatheritt, M. (1986). Innovations in policing. London: Croom Helm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stanko, E.A., Dawson, P. (2016). Evaluation in the Eye of the Storm: Reflections on the Diamond Evaluation. In: Police Use of Research Evidence. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20648-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20648-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20647-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20648-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)