Abstract
An early starting point in our survey design on receptivity of evidence-based policing was how we went about describing what evidence was and the different shades of evidence that we could present to staff. We took a broad approach in attempting to establish evidence as a type of information (Briner and Rousseau 2011) that people use to inform their decision-making. Our survey listed concepts from ‘professional experience’ to ‘academic journals’ to ‘web-blogs’ to ‘The Home Office Website’. All of these to a degree are evidence, but the quality varies and there lays the rub. As we saw, one of the most striking findings from the survey was the daily use of professional experience, and regular use of newspapers and public opinions to make decisions. More formal types of evidence (e.g.) bespoke problem profiles and in-house research were used, but less frequently. Academic journals, the UK’s College of Policing’s knowledge sharing portal POLKA, Home Office and Ministry of Justice websites were very rarely used.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We acknowledge that there are some excellent blogs out there for research and important issues ‘see mental health cop’. http://mentalhealthcop.wordpress.com/.
- 2.
This is a knowledge-sharing site that is open only to police officers, police staff and those who work in Policing and Crime Commissioners’ offices.
- 3.
References
Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence‐based I–O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 3–22.
Dawson, P., & Williams, E. (2009). Reflections from a police research unit—An inside job. Policing, 3(4), 373–380.
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., et al. (2008). Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ [British Medical Journal], 336(7650), 924.
Sherman, L., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., et al. (1997a). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Sherman, L. W. et al. (1997). Preventing crime: what works, what doesn't, what's promising. Report to the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC. US Dept. of Justice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stanko, E.A., Dawson, P. (2016). The Need for Standards of Evidence Within Evidence-Based Policing. In: Police Use of Research Evidence. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20648-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20648-6_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20647-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20648-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)