Abstract
The research into public confidence in policing was driven by the fact that we were keen to move beyond crude ‘tick-box’ notions of citizen satisfaction, which offer ways of thinking about the direct contact between citizens, policing and their police. The work on confidence asks ‘why’ police are important in democratic relationship between citizen and state. For many police officers, trying to enhance the legitimacy of their organisation can often seem an abstract or over-complicated endeavour, especially if they believe their core concern should be around improving tactics to fight crime. Of course, these are not mutually exclusive aims. The research on public confidence is trying to influence the way police interact with citizens. There is considerable evidence that trust in the police is important for the rule of law in itself. Trust in policing is linked to concrete citizen behaviours—cooperation with officers, compliance with the law and engagement in informal social control—that would help police to achieve their crime fighting goals and benefit officers by helping them doing their own jobs better (Tyler 1990; 2007; 2011; Tyler and Fagan 2008; Tyler and Huo 2002; Sunshine and Tyler 2003). Tyler’s procedural justice model (Tyler 1990) is now being discussed in a number of countries for its link to improved policing. He firmly links the fairness with which police officers exercise their authority to public trust, police legitimacy, and the types of behaviour listed above. Interpreted in its broadest (and perhaps most optimistic) light, procedural justice theory holds out the promise of a criminal justice system predicated on a more cooperative and less coercive relationship between police and public than it often seems to be the case (Hough et al. 2010). And it does so by placing the relationship between police and public centre stage. Perhaps we in Western democracies have underestimated the damage distrust does to public cooperation with public institutions. But following the disorders in London in 2011 and in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014 we are less dismissive of its critical requirement.
This section of the monograph draws on Stanko et al. 2012 A golden thread.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
On a related note, when looking at the national picture in England and Wales, Bradford (2011) found that the (small) positive effect of contact on ‘overall’ confidence may have grown since the 1980s, which, among other things, could suggest that people are more ‘open-minded’ about police, and more ready to change their minds as a result of personal experiences (alternatively, it might suggest growing fragility in opinions, as once settled views of the police, positive or negative, become destabilized and more subject to change).
- 2.
Initially newsletters were disseminated on a quarterly basis. However, this has waxed and waned over the past years with different financial resources and changes in leadership commitment.
References
Bradford, B. (2011). Convergence, not divergence?: Trends and trajectories in public contact and confidence in the police. British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 179–200.
Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2010). Trust and confidence in the police: A conceptual review. National Police Improvement Agency Wiki. Retrieved from SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1684508.
Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Stanko, E. A. (2009). Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing & Society,19(1), 20–46.
Hohl, K., Bradford, B., & Stanko, E. A. (2010). Influencing trust and confidence in the metropolitan police: Results from an experiment testing the effect of leaflet-drops on public opinion. British Journal of Criminology, 50(3), 491–513.
Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing, 4(3), 203–210.
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010). What is trust and confidence in the police? Policing, 4(3), 241–248.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hohl, K., & Farrall, S. (2009). Does the fear of crime erode public confidence in policing. Policing, 3(1), 100–111.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., & Hohl, K. (2013). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. London: Routledge.
Loader, I., & Mulcahy, A. (2003). Policing and the condition of England: Memory, politics and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, J., Davis, R. C., Henderson, N. J., et al. (2004). Public opinions of the police: The influence of friends, family and news media. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
Rosenbaum, D. P., Schuck, A. M., Costello, S. K., Hawkins, D. F., & Ring, M. K. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 343–365.
Skogan, W. G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing & Society, 16(02), 99–126.
Stanko, B., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., & Hohl, K. (2012). A golden thread, a presence amongst uniforms, and a good deal of data: Studying public confidence in the London Metropolitan Police. Policing and Society, 22(3), 317–331.
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.
Tyler, T. (1990a). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tyler, T. R. (1990b). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance.
Tyler, T. (Ed.). (2007). Legitimacy and criminal justice: International perspectives. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
Tyler, T. R. (2011). Why people cooperate: The role of social motivations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231.
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts through. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Wünsch, D., & Hohl, K. (2009). Evidencing a ‘good practice model’ of police communication: The impact of local policing newsletters on public confidence1. Policing, 3(4), 331–339.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stanko, E.A., Dawson, P. (2016). The Challenge in Making Effective Research Influence Policing. In: Police Use of Research Evidence. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20648-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20648-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20647-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20648-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)