Skip to main content

Single-Site Robotic Urologic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery

Abstract

Utilization of robotics in urologic surgery has been broadly popularized as it provides substantial advantages over conventional laparoscopic and open approaches, including improved fine dexterity, three-dimensional high-definition magnified optics, and augmented ergonomics. Accordingly, these features have facilitated the espousal of robotics for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) to surmount challenges with instrument clashing, intra-corporeal suturing, and intra-abdominal triangulation. Herein we discuss currently available single-site robotic techniques and technology while focusing on specific urology procedures and the future of RLESS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Stein RJ. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int. 2008;103:366–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stein RJ, White WM, Geol RK, Irwin BH, Haber GP, Kaouk JH. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. Eur Urol. 2010;57:132–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, Laydner H, Hillyer SP, Khanna R, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: surgical techniques and comparative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;59:815–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, Khanna R, Forest S, Yang B, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: technique and early outcomes. Eur Urol. 2010;58:544–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arkoncel FR, Lee JW, Rha KH, Han WK, Jeoung HB, Oh CK. Two-port robot-assisted vs standard robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison. Urology. 2011;78:581–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olweny EO, Park SK, Tan YK, Gurbus C, Caddedu J, Best SL. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty. Eur Urol. 2012;61:410–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph RA, Goh AC, Cuevas SP, Donovan MA, Kauffman MG, Salas NA, et al. Chostick surgery: a novel technique improves surgeon performance and eliminates arm collision in robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1331–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haber GP, White MA, Autorino R, Escobar PF, Kroh MD, Chalikonda S, et al. Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology. 2010;76:1279–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Komninos C, Shin TY, Tuliao P, Yoon YE, Koo KC, Chang CH, et al. R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcomes is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;66:512–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Janetschek G. Robotics: will they give a new kick to single-site surgery? Eur Urol. 2014;66:1044–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Han DH, Lee SW, Yinghao S, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol. 2011;60:998–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, Hillyer S, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH. Robotic laparoendoscopic single site urological surgery: analysis of 50 consecutive cases. J Urol. 2012;187:1696–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JW, Arkoncel FRP, Rha KH, Choi KH, Yu HS, Chae Y, et al. Urologic robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using a homemade single-port device: a single-center experience of 68 cases. J Endourol. 2011;25:1481–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Joseph RA, Salas NA, Johnson C, Goh A, Cuevas SP, Donovan MA, et al. Chopstick surgery: a novel technique enables use of the da Vinci robot to perform single-incision laparoscopic surgery [video]. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cestari A, Buffi NM, Lista G, Lughezzani G, Larcher A, Lazzeri M, et al. Feasibility and preliminary clinic outcomes of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty using a new single-port platform. Eur Urol. 2012;62:175–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Single port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72:1190–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fareed K, Zaytoun OM, Autorino R, White WM, Crouzet S, Yakoubi R, et al. Robotic single port suprapubic transvesicle enucleation of the prostate (R-STEP): initial experience. BJU Int. 2012;110:732–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laydner H, Akca O, Autorino R, Eyraud R, Zargar H, Brandao LF, et al. Perineal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in the cadaver model. J Endourol. 2014;28(12):1479–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Akca O, Zargar H, Kaouk JH. Robotic surgery revives radical perineal prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):340–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pietrabissa A, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Peri A, Peri A, Tinozzi FP, Cavazzi E, et al. Short-term outcomes of a single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):3089–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jihad H. Kaouk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramirez, D., Maurice, M.J., Kaouk, J.H. (2018). Single-Site Robotic Urologic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Technology. In: Hemal, A., Menon, M. (eds) Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20645-5_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20645-5_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20644-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20645-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics