Laparoscopy or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Pros and Cons
Radical prostatectomy is currently performed commonly by robotic assistance (RRP) in western world surpassing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP).Robotic assistance has distinct advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery, as it improves precision because endowrist technology providing freedom of movements to its instruments in 3-D vision with better ergonomics for the surgeon. The biggest challenge is the cost of the robot, so as the price of its maintenance and instruments. The cost of LRP is much lower than that of the RRP. Of course, the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is steep. Development of newer instrumentation with 4 degree of movements and 3-D vision during laparoscopy may resurrect role of LRP. This chapter focusses on pros and cons of LRP and RRP.
KeywordsLaparoscopy Robotic Radical prostatectomy
- 19.Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, et al. Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Eur Urol. 2013;64:361–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Ku JY, Lee CH, Lee JZ, Ha HK. Comparison of functional outcomes between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.12595.