Abstract
This paper reports the results of an experiment designed to investigate the effectiveness of different collaborative group formations (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous in terms of prior knowledge levels) for learning complex materials in a blending learning environment from the perspective of cognitive load theory. The results of the experiment demonstrated overall benefits of the heterogeneous composition of the collaborative groups. The results also indicated that levels of learners’ prior knowledge might influence the effectiveness of collaborative conditions. For learners with lower levels of prior knowledge, the heterogeneous collaborative group was more effective than homogeneous condition while there were no differences between the conditions for more advanced learners. Reported lower ratings of cognitive load for the heterogeneous condition supported the cognitive load explanation of the results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andersson, J., Rönnberg, J.: Recall suffers from collaboration: joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity. Applied Cogn. Psychol. 9, 199–211 (1995). doi:10.1002/acp.2350090303
Baddeley, A.: Working Memory. Oxford University Press, New York (1986)
Gamoran, A.: Organization, instruction, and the effects of ability grouping: comment on Slavin’s “Best-Evidence Synthesis”. Rev. Educ. Research 57(3), 341–345 (1987)
Hatano, G., Inagaki, K.: Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., Teasley, S.D. (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 331–348. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1991)
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills, 7th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (2000)
Kalyuga, S.: Cognitive load theory: how many types of load does it really need? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 23, 1–19 (2011). doi:10.1007/210648-010-9150-7
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P.A.: Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(2), 306–314 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P.: Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: the collective working-memory effect. Applied Cogn. Psychol. (2011). doi:10.1002/acp.1730
Lainema, T., Nurmi, S.: Applying an authentic, dynamic learning environment in real world business. Comput. Educ. 47, 94–115 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.002
Laughlin, P.R., Hatch, E.C., Silver, J.S., Boh, L.: Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 644–651 (2006). doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.644
Meudell, P.R., Hitch, G.J., Kirby, P.: Are two heads better than one? experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. Applied Cogn. Psychol. 6, 525–543 (1992). doi:10.1002/acp.2350060606
Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63, 81–97 (1956). doi:10.1037/h0043158
Murphy, P.K., Alexander, P.A.: Understanding How Students Learn: A Guide For Instructional Leaders. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks (2005)
Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., Sweller, J.: Worked example effects in individual and group work settings. Educ. Psychol. 30(3), 349–367 (2010). doi:10.1080/01443411003659960
Slavin, R.E.: Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2nd edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1995)
Sweller, J.: Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In: Ross, B. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 43, pp. 215–266. Academic Press, San Diego (2003)
Sweller, J.: Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 123–138 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., Kalyuga, S.: Cognitive Load Theory. Springer, NewYork (2011)
Webb, G.: On pretexts for higher education development activities. High. Educ. 24, 351–361 (1992)
Webb, N.M.: Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. J. Res. Math. Educ. 22(5), 366–389 (1991)
Webb, N.M., Farivar, S.: Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics. In: O’Donnell, A.M., King, A. (eds.) Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, pp. 117–150. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1999)
Zhang, L., Ayres, P., Chan, K.: Examining different types of collaborative learning in a complex computer-based environment: a cognitive load approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 94–98 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.038
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, L., Kalyuga, S., Lee, C.H., Lei, C., Jiao, J. (2015). Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning with Complex Tasks Under Different Learning Group Formations: A Cognitive Load Perspective. In: Cheung, S., Kwok, Lf., Yang, H., Fong, J., Kwan, R. (eds) Hybrid Learning: Innovation in Educational Practices. ICHL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9167. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20621-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20621-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20620-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20621-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)