Advertisement

The Learning Effect of Augmented Reality Training in a Computer-Based Simulation Environment

  • Jung Hyup KimEmail author
  • Tiffany Chan
  • Wei Du
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9192)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effect of Augmented Reality (AR) in a computer-based simulation environment for training an operator to interact with a radar screen. The research team developed the AR training system for Anti-Air Warfare Coordinator (AAWC) and the training textbook for the same task. By using these, we compared the performance between a group trained by the AR method and another group trained by the textbook method. 24 undergraduate students in the Junior and Senior levels joined in this experiment. The experiment consisted of two sessions: training session and practice session. During the training session, 12 of the students completed the training lesson by using the AR training (Group A), and the other 12 students completed the training lesson using the AAWC training textbook. To evaluate the performance of AAWC task, we used Situational Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT). The ANOVA results indicate there was a significant performance difference between Group A and Group B, F (1,12) = 12.29,p < 0.01. Participants who were instructed by the AR training showed higher situation awareness compared to others. It supports the training, which is designed based on AR contents, can provide a positive learning effect in computer-based training simulation.

Keywords

Augmented reality Human-in-the-loop simulation Situation awareness 

References

  1. Arvanitis, T., Petrou, A., Knight, J., Savas, S., Sotiriou, S., Gargalakos, M., Gialouri, E.: Human factors and qualitative pedagogical evaluation of a mobile augmented reality system for science education used by learners with physical disabilities. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 13(3), 243–250 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s00779-007-0187-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence 6(4), 355–385 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M.B., Kloos, C.D.: Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput. Educ. 68, 586–596 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Paper Presented at the Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National, NAECON 1988 (1988)Google Scholar
  5. Endsley, M.R.: Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Hofmann, T., König, C., Bruder, R., Bergner, J.: How to reduce workload–augmented reality to ease the work of air traffic controllers. Work: A Journal of Prevention. Assess. Rehabil. 41, 1168–1173 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. Kamphuis, C., Barsom, E., Schijven, M., & Christoph, N.: Augmented reality in medical education? Perspectives on medical education, pp. 1–12 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. Kaufmann, H.: Construct3D: an augmented reality application for mathematics and geometry education. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia (2002)Google Scholar
  9. Kaufmann, H., Steinbügl, K., Dünser, A., Glück, J.: General training of spatial abilities by geometry education in augmented reality. Annu. Rev. CyberTherapy Telemedicine: A Decade of VR 3, 65–76 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Kim, J.H., Rothrock, L., Tharanathan, A., Thiruvengada, H.: Investigating the Effects of Metacognition in Dynamic Control Tasks. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction, Part I, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6761, pp. 378–387. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  11. Lee, K.: Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends 56(2), 13–21 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, C.: Augmented Reality in Medical. Advanced Interface Design, p. 49 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. Liu, T.-Y., Tan, T.-H., Chu, Y.-L.: 2D barcode and augmented reality supported english learning system. In: Paper presented at the 6th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science, 2007. ICIS 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. Macht, G.A., Nembhard, D.A., Kim, J.H., Rothrock, L.: Structural models of extraversion, communication, and team performance. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 44(1), 82–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maier, P., Tönnis, M., Klinker, G.: Augmented Reality for teaching spatial relations. In: Paper Presented at the Conference of the International Journal of Arts & Sciences, Toronto (2009)Google Scholar
  16. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Luís Saorín, J., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D.C., Ortega, M.: Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Comput. Graph. 34(1), 77–91 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Medicherla, P. S., Chang, G., Morreale, P.: Visualization for increased understanding and learning using augmented reality. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia information retrieval (2010)Google Scholar
  18. Shuhaiber, J.H.: Augmented reality in surgery. Arch. Surg. 139(2), 170–174 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu, H.-K., Lee, S.W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., Liang, J.-C.: Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput. Educ. 62, 41–49 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations