Enhancing the Learner’s Performance Analysis Using SMEUS Semantic E-learning System and Business Intelligence Technologies

  • Fisnik DalipiEmail author
  • Sule Yildirim Yayilgan
  • Zenun Kastrati
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9192)


Ontologies represent an efficient way of semantic web application on e-learning and offer great opportunity by bringing great advantages to e-learning systems. Nevertheless, despite the many advantages that we get from using ontologies, in terms of structuring the data, there are still many unresolved problems related to the difficulties about getting proper information about a learner’s behavior. Consequently, there is a need of developing tools that enable analysis of the learner’s interaction with the e-learning environment. In this paper, we propose a framework for the application of Business Intelligence (BI) and OLAP technologies in SMEUS e-learning environment. Hence, on one hand, the proposed framework will enable and support the decision-making by answering some questions related to learner’s performance, and on the other hand, will present a case study model for implementing these technologies into a semantic e-learning environment.


E-learning SMEUS Ontology OLAP Data analysis 


  1. 1.
    Zilli, A., et al.: Semantic Knowledge Management: An Ontology-Based Framework. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanchez, M., Breis, J., Sanchez, J., Espinosa, P.: Practical experiences for the development of educational systems in the semantic web. New Approaches Educ. Res. 2(1), 23–31 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dalipi F., Idrizi F., Rufati E., Asani F.: On integration of ontologies into e-learning systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks, Tetovo, Macedonia (2014). ISBN 978-1-4799-5076-8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zorilla, M.E., Alvarez, E.: MATEP: Monitoring and analysis tool for e-learning platforms. In: 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Santander, Spain (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Avouris, N., et al.: Logging of fingertip actions is not enough for analysis of learning activities. In: Proceedings of Workshop Usage Analysis in learning systems, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toivonen, S., Niemi, T.: Describing data sources semantically for facilitating efficient creation of OLAP cubes. In: 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), Hiroshima, Japan, November 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Priebe, T., Pernul, G.: Ontology-based integration of OLAP and information retrieval. In: The DEXA 2003 Workshop on Web Semantics, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2003Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sell, D., et al.: SBI: A semantic framework to support business intelligence. In: ACM Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Ontology-Supported Business Intelligence, OBI 2008, Karlsruhe, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cody, W.F., Kreulen, J.T., Krishna, V., Spangler, W.S.: The integration of business intelligence and knowledge management. IBM Syst. J. 41(4), 697–713 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergamaschi, S., Quix, C., Jarke, M.: The SEWASIE EU IST project. SIG SEMIS Bull. 2(1), 59–69 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nebic, Z; Mahnic, V. Data warehouse for an e-learning platform. In: Proceedings of the 14th WSEAS International Conference on Computers: Part of the 14th WSEAS CSCC multiconference, vol. II (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falakmasir, M.H., Moaven, S., Abolhassani, H., Habibi, J.: Business intelligence in e-learning (case study on the Iran university of science and technology dataset). In: SEDM 2010 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Data Mining, Chengdu, China, June 2010Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cakula, Sarma, Salem, Abdel-Badeeh M.: E-learning developing using ontological engineering. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl. 10(1), 1–13 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmer, M.: E-learning in the semantic age. CID, Centre For User Oriented It Design, Stockhom (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pirttimäki, V. Business intelligence as a managerial tool in large Finnish companies. (Doctoral dissertation). TUT DPub, Tampere University of Technology, Publication 646 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sangar, A.B., Iahad, N.B.A.: Critical factors that affect the success of business intelligence systems (BIS) implementation in an organization. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2(2), 176–180 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zorrilla, M.E.: Data warehouse technology for e-learning. In: Zakrzewska, D., Menasalvas, E., Byczkowska-Lipinska, L. (eds.) Methods and Supporting Technologies for Data Analysis. SCI, vol. 225, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fisnik Dalipi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sule Yildirim Yayilgan
    • 1
  • Zenun Kastrati
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and Media TechnologyGjovik University CollegeGjovikNorway

Personalised recommendations