Advertisement

Voice-Based Computer Mediated Communication for Individual Practice to Increase Speaking Proficiency: Construction and Pilot Study

  • Yuichi OnoEmail author
  • Akio Onishi
  • Manabu Ishihara
  • Mitsuo Yamashiro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9192)

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of an asynchronous blog system on speaking proficiency for EFL learners in Japan. The novelty of the system is its incorporation of Web Speech API, which leads to higher performance compared with the use of web applications for classroom purposes. On the basis of a questionnaire survey conducted as pilot research, we demonstrate that the system has potential to improve speaking proficiency and increases the motivation of less motivated learners.

Keywords

Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Voice blog Speech recognition Speaking accuracy 

References

  1. 1.
    Levy, M., Stockwell, G.: CALL Dimensions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirotani, M.: Synchronous versus asynchronous CMC and transfer to Japanese oral performance. CALICO J. 26(2), 413–438 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao, Y.: Recent developments in technology and language learning: a literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO J. 21(1), 7–27 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gleason, J., Suvorov, R.: Learner Perceptions of Asynchronous Oral Computer-Mediated Communication Tasks Using Wimba Voice for Developing their L2 Oral Proficiency. In: Huffman, S., Hegelheimer, V. (eds.) The role of CALL in hybrid and online language courses. Iowa State University, Ames (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lomicka, L., Lord, G., Manzer, M.: Merging foreign language theory and practice in designing technology-based tasks. In: Cherry, C.M. (ed.) Dimension, pp. 37–52. SCOLT Publications, Valdosta State University (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beauvois, M.: Computer-mediated communication (cmc): technology for improving speaking and writing. In: Bush, M.D., Terry, R.M. (eds.) Technology Enhanced Language Learning, pp. 165–184. National Textbook Company, Lincolnwood (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosen, L.: Reaching students: a hybrid approach to language learning. In: Oxford, R., Oxford, J. (eds.) Second Language Teaching and Learning in the Net Generation, pp. 64–84. University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center, Honolulu (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chapelle, C.: Survey on technology use for language learning (Survey). Unpublished instrument, Department of English, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Satar, H.M., Ozdener, N.: The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: text versus voice chat. Mod. Lang. J. 92(iv), 595–613 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hsu, H.-S.: Investigating the effects of planning on L2 text chat performance. CALICO J. 29(4), 619–638 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamada, M.: The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Comput. Educ. 52(4), 820–833 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chun, D.: Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System 22(1), 17–31 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warschauer, M.: Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO J. 13(2–3), 7–26 (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abrams, Z.I.: The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Mod. Lang. J. 87(2), 157–167 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beauvois, M.H.: E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Comput. Humanit. 28(1), 177–190 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, B.: The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communication. System 31, 29–53 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris, F.: Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Lang. Learn. Technol. 9(1), 29–45 (2005)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jepson, K.: Conversations—And negotiated interaction—In text and voice chat rooms. Lang. Learn. Technol. 9(3), 79–98 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hiltz, S.R., Goldman, R.: What are asynchronous learning networks? In: Hiltz, S.R., Goldman, R. (eds.) Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, pp. 3–18. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levy, M., Stockwell, G.: CALL Dimensions: Options & Issues In Computer Assisted Language Learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lamy, M.-N., Hampel, R.: Online Communication In Language Learning And Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cox, T.L.: Using automatic speech recognition technology with elicited oral response testing. CALICO J. 29(4), 601–618 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ono, Y., Ishihara, M.: Integrating mobile-based individual activities into the Japanese EFL classroom. Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organ. 6(2), 116–137 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ono, M., Ishihara, M., Onishi, A. Yamashiro, M.: Classrooms and voice recognition applications in a foreign language teaching, In: Proceedings of 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering, The Australian Acoustical Society (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuichi Ono
    • 1
    Email author
  • Akio Onishi
    • 2
  • Manabu Ishihara
    • 3
  • Mitsuo Yamashiro
    • 4
  1. 1.Foreign Language CenterUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Version 2SapporoJapan
  3. 3.Electrical and Computer EngineeringOyama National College of TechnologyTochigiJapan
  4. 4.Electrical and Computer EngineeringAshikaga Institute of TechnologyTochigiJapan

Personalised recommendations