Abstract
In addition to intuitively plausible dependence structures in the time series dimension, in many applications it is reasonable to assume that there are contagion, spill-over, and repercussion effects among cross-sectional units. Modeling those structures in the systematic part of a panel regression requires both information on the underlying sources that drive the dependence and their respective range. The range allows one to define a neighborhood for each unit, a crucial concept for common methods in spatial statistics and econometrics. Furthermore, specification of a parametric regression function requires knowledge of the specific functional form of the spatial associations. However, lacking information on the sources usually leads to accepting misspecification and to including spatial error component or factor structures. As recent research reveals, the consequences of misspecification in both strategies are troubling in many cases. This paper proposes a data-driven nonparametric method for determining neighborhood as a first step. Second step nonparametric panel regressions have several benefits: (i) they allow one to test for misclassification of cross-sectional units to a wrong neighborhood in the first step; (ii) estimation is accomplished using data beyond the respective neighborhood, thus imposing less structure than parametric methods; (iii) neighborhood/location effects can be directly estimated in analogy to spatial statistics; (iv) no assumptions on functional form are required. The proposed method is illustrated with an empirical analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of high-skilled employees across German regions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the context of panel (or longitudinal data) a cross-sectional unit i at time point t is indexed by it. We consider a (vector valued) random process \(Y =\{ Y _{n_{it}}\}_{n\in \mathcal{N}}\). For the sake of simplicity, the following considerations refer to a given time period t, as we will not discuss forms of cross-section dependence varying in the time dimension. However, the proposed non-parametric approach allows for such cases, for example spatio-temporal processes by simultaneous smoothing over n = (longitude, latitude, time).
- 2.
The respective goals in those two strands of literature may differ significantly as suggested by the respective discussions of theory and applications in Kauermann, Haupt, and Kaufmann (2012).
- 3.
Employees liable for social security insurance, who have at least 11 years of schooling and a degree.
- 4.
Note that the estimation of Eq. (11) is based on cross-section data, where only information in the initial and final time period is employed. The a priori selection of t = 0 and t = T, respectively, may have a crucial impact on the outcome. We will not discuss such sources of non-robustness in this study.
- 5.
For the sake of brevity we will not discuss issues of neglected heterogeneity induced by spatial association due to spill-over and repercussion effects between German regions here.
- 6.
In the present case of high-skilled employees in German regions the corresponding log t regression reveals no evidence in favor of global convergence on any reasonable significance level.
References
Alfò, M., Trovato, G., & Waldmann, R. (2008). Testing for country heterogeneity in growth models using a finite mixture approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 487–514.
Andrews, D. (2005). Cross-section regression with common shocks. Econometrica, 73, 1551–1585.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics. Studies in operational regional science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.
Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X., Blanchard, O. J., & Hall, R. E. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 107–182.
Bivand, R., Pebesma, E., & Gómez-Rubio, V. (2013). Applied spatial data analysis with R. New York: Springer.
Canarella, G., & Pollard, S. (2004). Parameter heterogeneity in the classical growth model: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Economic Development, 29 1–31.
Conley, T. (1999). GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence. Journal of Econometrics, 92, 1–45.
Conley, T., & Topa, G. (2002). Socio-economic distance and spatial patterns in unemployment. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17, 303–327.
Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for spatial data. New York: Wiley.
Durlauf, S. N., & Quah, D. T. (1999). The new empirics of economic growth. In: J. B. Taylor & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol.1, Chap. 4, pp. 235–308). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Elhorst, J. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1), 9–28.
Ertur, C., & Koch, W. (2007). Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: Theory and evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(6), 1033–1062.
Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. (1998). How many clusters? which clustering methods? answers via model-based cluster analysis. Computer Journal, 41, 578–588.
Gaetan, C., & Guyon, X. (2010). Spatial statistics and modeling. New York: Springer.
Handcock, M., Raftery, A., & Tantrum, J. (2007). Model-based clustering for social networks (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 170, 301–354.
Haupt, H., & Meier, V. (2011). Dealing with heterogeneity, nonlinearity and club misclassification in growth convergence: A nonparametric two-step approach. Working Papers from Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics, No 455.
Haupt, H., & Ng, P. (2014). Smooth quantile smoothing spline estimation of urban house price surfaces under conditional price and spatial heterogeneity. Working Paper.
Haupt, H., & Petring, V. (2011). Assessing parametric misspecification and heterogeneity in growth regression. Applied Economics Letters, 18(4), 389–394.
Haupt, H., Schnurbus, J., & Tschernig, R. (2010). On nonparametric estimation of a hedonic price function. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 5, 894–901.
Henderson, D. (2010). A test for multimodality of regression derivatives with application to nonparametric growth regression. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(3), 458–480.
Hsiao, C., Li, Q., & Racine, J. S. (2007). A consistent model specification test with mixed discrete and continuous data. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 802–826.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T., Savvides, A., & Stengos, T. (2001). Measures of human capital and nonlinearities in economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 229–254.
Kauermann, G., Haupt, H., & Kaufmann, N. (2012). A hitchhiker’s view on spatial statistics and spatial econometrics for lattice data. Statistical Modelling, 12, 419–440.
Kelejian, H., & Prucha, I. (2010). Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. Journal of Econometrics, 157, 53–67.
Kuersteiner, G., & Prucha, I. (2013). Limit theory for panel data models with cross sectional dependence and sequential exogeneity. Journal of Econometrics, 174, 107–126.
LeSage, J., & Pace, K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. London: Taylor and Francis.
Li, Q., & Racine, J. S. (2004). Cross-validated local linear nonparametric regression. Statistica Sinica, 14, 485–512.
Li, Q., & Racine, J. S. (2007). Nonparametric econometrics: Theory and practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Liu, Z., & Stengos, T. (1999). Non-linearities in cross-country growth regressions: A semiparametric approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14(5), 527–538.
Maasoumi, E., Li, Q., & Racine, J. (2007). Growth and convergence: A profile of distribution dynamics and mobility. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 483–508.
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.
Mansanjala, W., & Papageorgiou, C. (2004). The solow model with CES technology: Nonlinearities and parameter heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(2), 171–201.
Pace, R. K., & LeSage, J. (2010). Spatial econometrics. In: A. E. Gelfand, P. J. Diggle, M. Fuentes, & P. Guttorp (Eds.), Handbook of Spatial Statistics (pp. 245–262). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2007). Modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771–1855.
Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2009). Economic transition and growth. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(7), 1153–1185.
Quah, D. (1993). Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 37, 426–434.
Quah, D. (1997). Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 27–59.
Racine, J. S., & Li, Q. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of regression functions with both categorical and continuous data. Journal of Econometrics, 119(1), 99–130.
Ripley, B. D. (1981). Spatial statistics. New Jersey: Wiley.
Sarafidis, V., & Wansbeek, T. (2012). Cross-sectional dependence in panel data analysis. Econometric Reviews, 31, 483–531.
Spanos, A. (1986). Statistical foundations of econometric modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haupt, H., Schnurbus, J. (2015). A Nonparametric Approach to Modeling Cross-Section Dependence in Panel Data: Smart Regions in Germany. In: Stemmler, M., von Eye, A., Wiedermann, W. (eds) Dependent Data in Social Sciences Research. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20585-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20585-4_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20584-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20585-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)