Skip to main content

A Nonparametric Approach to Modeling Cross-Section Dependence in Panel Data: Smart Regions in Germany

  • Conference paper
Dependent Data in Social Sciences Research

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 145))

Abstract

In addition to intuitively plausible dependence structures in the time series dimension, in many applications it is reasonable to assume that there are contagion, spill-over, and repercussion effects among cross-sectional units. Modeling those structures in the systematic part of a panel regression requires both information on the underlying sources that drive the dependence and their respective range. The range allows one to define a neighborhood for each unit, a crucial concept for common methods in spatial statistics and econometrics. Furthermore, specification of a parametric regression function requires knowledge of the specific functional form of the spatial associations. However, lacking information on the sources usually leads to accepting misspecification and to including spatial error component or factor structures. As recent research reveals, the consequences of misspecification in both strategies are troubling in many cases. This paper proposes a data-driven nonparametric method for determining neighborhood as a first step. Second step nonparametric panel regressions have several benefits: (i) they allow one to test for misclassification of cross-sectional units to a wrong neighborhood in the first step; (ii) estimation is accomplished using data beyond the respective neighborhood, thus imposing less structure than parametric methods; (iii) neighborhood/location effects can be directly estimated in analogy to spatial statistics; (iv) no assumptions on functional form are required. The proposed method is illustrated with an empirical analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of high-skilled employees across German regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the context of panel (or longitudinal data) a cross-sectional unit i at time point t is indexed by it. We consider a (vector valued) random process \(Y =\{ Y _{n_{it}}\}_{n\in \mathcal{N}}\). For the sake of simplicity, the following considerations refer to a given time period t, as we will not discuss forms of cross-section dependence varying in the time dimension. However, the proposed non-parametric approach allows for such cases, for example spatio-temporal processes by simultaneous smoothing over n = (longitude, latitude, time).

  2. 2.

    The respective goals in those two strands of literature may differ significantly as suggested by the respective discussions of theory and applications in Kauermann, Haupt, and Kaufmann (2012).

  3. 3.

    Employees liable for social security insurance, who have at least 11 years of schooling and a degree.

  4. 4.

    Note that the estimation of Eq. (11) is based on cross-section data, where only information in the initial and final time period is employed. The a priori selection of t = 0 and t = T, respectively, may have a crucial impact on the outcome. We will not discuss such sources of non-robustness in this study.

  5. 5.

    For the sake of brevity we will not discuss issues of neglected heterogeneity induced by spatial association due to spill-over and repercussion effects between German regions here.

  6. 6.

    In the present case of high-skilled employees in German regions the corresponding log t regression reveals no evidence in favor of global convergence on any reasonable significance level.

References

  • Alfò, M., Trovato, G., & Waldmann, R. (2008). Testing for country heterogeneity in growth models using a finite mixture approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 487–514.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. (2005). Cross-section regression with common shocks. Econometrica, 73, 1551–1585.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics. Studies in operational regional science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X., Blanchard, O. J., & Hall, R. E. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 107–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand, R., Pebesma, E., & Gómez-Rubio, V. (2013). Applied spatial data analysis with R. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Canarella, G., & Pollard, S. (2004). Parameter heterogeneity in the classical growth model: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Economic Development, 29 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. (1999). GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence. Journal of Econometrics, 92, 1–45.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T., & Topa, G. (2002). Socio-economic distance and spatial patterns in unemployment. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17, 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for spatial data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N., & Quah, D. T. (1999). The new empirics of economic growth. In: J. B. Taylor & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol.1, Chap. 4, pp. 235–308). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst, J. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertur, C., & Koch, W. (2007). Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: Theory and evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(6), 1033–1062.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. (1998). How many clusters? which clustering methods? answers via model-based cluster analysis. Computer Journal, 41, 578–588.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gaetan, C., & Guyon, X. (2010). Spatial statistics and modeling. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Handcock, M., Raftery, A., & Tantrum, J. (2007). Model-based clustering for social networks (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 170, 301–354.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haupt, H., & Meier, V. (2011). Dealing with heterogeneity, nonlinearity and club misclassification in growth convergence: A nonparametric two-step approach. Working Papers from Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics, No 455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt, H., & Ng, P. (2014). Smooth quantile smoothing spline estimation of urban house price surfaces under conditional price and spatial heterogeneity. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt, H., & Petring, V. (2011). Assessing parametric misspecification and heterogeneity in growth regression. Applied Economics Letters, 18(4), 389–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haupt, H., Schnurbus, J., & Tschernig, R. (2010). On nonparametric estimation of a hedonic price function. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 5, 894–901.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. (2010). A test for multimodality of regression derivatives with application to nonparametric growth regression. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(3), 458–480.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C., Li, Q., & Racine, J. S. (2007). A consistent model specification test with mixed discrete and continuous data. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 802–826.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T., Savvides, A., & Stengos, T. (2001). Measures of human capital and nonlinearities in economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 229–254.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kauermann, G., Haupt, H., & Kaufmann, N. (2012). A hitchhiker’s view on spatial statistics and spatial econometrics for lattice data. Statistical Modelling, 12, 419–440.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H., & Prucha, I. (2010). Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. Journal of Econometrics, 157, 53–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuersteiner, G., & Prucha, I. (2013). Limit theory for panel data models with cross sectional dependence and sequential exogeneity. Journal of Econometrics, 174, 107–126.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J., & Pace, K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., & Racine, J. S. (2004). Cross-validated local linear nonparametric regression. Statistica Sinica, 14, 485–512.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., & Racine, J. S. (2007). Nonparametric econometrics: Theory and practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., & Stengos, T. (1999). Non-linearities in cross-country growth regressions: A semiparametric approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14(5), 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, E., Li, Q., & Racine, J. (2007). Growth and convergence: A profile of distribution dynamics and mobility. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 483–508.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mansanjala, W., & Papageorgiou, C. (2004). The solow model with CES technology: Nonlinearities and parameter heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(2), 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, R. K., & LeSage, J. (2010). Spatial econometrics. In: A. E. Gelfand, P. J. Diggle, M. Fuentes, & P. Guttorp (Eds.), Handbook of Spatial Statistics (pp. 245–262). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2007). Modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771–1855.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2009). Economic transition and growth. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(7), 1153–1185.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1993). Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 37, 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1997). Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 27–59.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Racine, J. S., & Li, Q. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of regression functions with both categorical and continuous data. Journal of Econometrics, 119(1), 99–130.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D. (1981). Spatial statistics. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarafidis, V., & Wansbeek, T. (2012). Cross-sectional dependence in panel data analysis. Econometric Reviews, 31, 483–531.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, A. (1986). Statistical foundations of econometric modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Haupt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haupt, H., Schnurbus, J. (2015). A Nonparametric Approach to Modeling Cross-Section Dependence in Panel Data: Smart Regions in Germany. In: Stemmler, M., von Eye, A., Wiedermann, W. (eds) Dependent Data in Social Sciences Research. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20585-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics