Advertisement

Towards a New Concept of Residential Well-Being Based on Bottom-Up Spillover and Need Hierarchy Theories

  • M. Joseph SirgyEmail author
Chapter
  • 485 Downloads
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 60)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the various conceptualizations of residential well-being and introduces a new conceptualization. The new concept of residential well-being is defined as satisfaction with one’s living arrangement captured by one’s home and its immediate surrounding (i.e., community) to the extent that this satisfaction contributes to the sense of well-being in seven major life domains, namely health/safety, financial, family, social, work, leisure/arts/culture, and education/personal development, which in turn all contribute to the overall sense of subjective well-being. The sense of well-being in major life domains such as health/safety, financial, and family life serves to meet basic needs a la Maslow (low-order needs related to survival such as biological and safety needs). In contrast, satisfaction in other life domains such social, work, leisure/arts/culture, and education/personal development serves to meet growth needs (again a la Maslow; high-order needs related to human flourishing). Thus, housing and community amenities play a significant role in each of the aforementioned life domains contributing to domain satisfaction, which in turn contribute to overall life satisfaction. Within a given life domain, satisfaction with housing and community amenities contribute to positive/negative affect within that domain. Based on this conceptualization of residential well-being, survey measures can be developed and tested to establish the reliability and validity of this construct.

Keywords

Residential well-being Quality of life Subjective well-being Life satisfaction Domain satisfaction Satisfaction with housing features and amenities Satisfaction with community services and conditions 

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1984). The meaning of housing in America. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74, 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amole, D. (2009). Residential satisfaction in students’ housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auh, S., & Cook, C. C. (2009). Quality of community life among rural residents: An integrated model. Social Indicators Research, 94, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, D. A., & Palmer, R. J. (2006). Examining the effects of perceptions of community and recreation participation on quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 75, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjornskov, C. (2003). The happy few: Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kylos, 56, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., & Bonnes, M. (2006). Perceived residential environment quality in middle- and low-extension Italian cities. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bratt, R. G. (2002). Housing and family well-being. Housing Studies, 17, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bubshait, A. A., & Al-Atiq, T. H. (1999). ISO 9000 quality standards in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Carp, F. M. (1976). Housing and living environments of older people. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social science (pp. 244–271). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, S., & Hinks, T. (2010). Crime and happiness amongst heads of households in Malawi. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, E. E., & Fine-Davis, M. (1991). Social indicators of living conditions in Ireland with European comparisons. Social Indicators Research, 25, 103–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dittmann, J., & Goebel, J. (2010). Your house, your car, your education: The socioeconomic situation of the neighborhood and its impact on life satisfaction in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 96, 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economical Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erdogan, N., Akyol, A., Ataman, B., & Dokmeci, V. (2007). Comparison of urban housing satisfaction in modern and traditional neighbourhoods in Edirne, Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 81, 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Galster, G. (1987). Identifying the correlates of dwelling satisfaction: An empirical critique. Environment and Behavior, 19, 539–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13, 735–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grzeskowiak, S., Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D-J., & Claiborne, C. B. (2006). Housing well-being: Developing and validating a measure. Social Indicators Research, 79, 503–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grzeskowiak, S., Sirgy, M. J., & Widgery, R. N. (2003). Residents’ satisfaction with community services: Predictors and outcomes. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 33, 1–36.Google Scholar
  22. Hafstrom, J. L., & Chung, Y. S. (1990). Housing domain of quality of life: Housing tenure, aesthetic aspects, and environmental attributes. In H. L. Meadow & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Quality-of-life studies in marketing and management (pp. 386–396). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, Center for Strategy and Marketing Studies.Google Scholar
  23. Hartnagel, T. F. (1979). The perception and fear of crime: Implications for neighborhood cohesion, social activity, and community affect. Social Forces, 58, 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handal, P. J., Barling, P. W., & Morrissy, E. (1981). Development of perceived and preferred measures of physical and social characteristics of the residential environment and their relation to satisfaction. Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Headey, B. W. (1981). The quality of life in Australia. Social Indicators Research, 9, 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hovik, N. (1992). Using socioeconomic indicators and perceived quality of life in the marketing of a community. In M. J. Sirgy, H. L. Meadow, D. Rahtz, & A. C. Samli (Eds.), Developments in quality-of-life studies in marketing (Vol. 4, pp. 128–132). Blacksburg, VA: Academy of Marketing Science.Google Scholar
  27. Hygge, S., Evans, G. W., & Bullinger, M. (2002). A prospective study of some effects of airport noise on cognitive performance in school children. Psychological Science, 13, 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ibem. E. O., & Amole, D. (2013). Residential satisfaction in public core housing in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 113, 563–581.Google Scholar
  29. Jacobs, S. V., Evans, G. W., Catalano, R., & Dooley, D. (1984). Air pollution and depressive symptomatology: Exploratory analyses of intervening psychosocial factors. Population and Environment, 7, 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. James, R. N., III. (2008). Residential satisfaction of elderly tenants in apartment housing. Social Indicators Research, 89, 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jeffres, L. W., & Dobos, J. (1990). Communication and public perceptions of quality of life. In H. L. Meadow & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Quality-of-life studies in marketing and management (pp. 633–644). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, Center for Strategy and Marketing Studies.Google Scholar
  32. Jeffres, L. W., & Dobos, J. (1992). Communication and public perceptions of the quality of life: Testing the model. In M. J. Sirgy, H. L. Meadow, D. Rahtz, & A. C. Samli (Eds.), Developments in quality-of-life studies in marketing (Vol. 4, pp. 43–49). Blacksburg, VA: Academy of Marketing Science.Google Scholar
  33. Jeffres, L. W., & Dobos, J. (1995). Communication and public perceptions of quality of life. In M. J. Sirgy & A. C. Samli (Eds.), New dimensions of marketing/quality-of-life research (pp. 227–252). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, E., & Park, N. (2010). Housing satisfaction and quality of life among temporary residents in the United States. Housing and Society, 37, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, Y., & Weber, M. (1984). Development of an instrument to measure the aesthetic quality of housing environment. Social Indicators Research, 15, 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leyden, K. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: The importance of Walkable neighbourhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1546–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, C-H., & Tsai, M-C. (2014). Is the easy life always the happiest? Examining the association of convenience and well-being in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 117, 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, F. D., Tsemberis, S., Malia, G. P., & Grega, D. (1980). Neighborhood satisfaction among urban dwellers. Journal of Social Issues, 36, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mohit, M. A., Ibrahim, M., & Rashid, Y. R. (2010). Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 34, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohit, M. A., & Nazyddah, N. (2011). Social housing programme of Selangor zakat board of Malaysia and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 26, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1978). Housing, family, and society. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1975). A theory of family housing adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mthembu, C. Z. (1997). Crime, a continuing national crisis: Its consequences on quality of community life. In H. L. Meadow (Ed.), Developments in quality-of-life studies (Vol. 1, p. 60). Blacksburg, VA: International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies.Google Scholar
  45. Noor, N. M., Gandhi, A. D., Ishak, & Wok, S. (2014). Development of indicators for family well-being in Malaysia. Social Indicators Research, 115, 279–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norman, W. C., Harwell, R., & Allen, L. R. (1997). The role of recreation on the quality of life of residents in rural communities in South Carolina. In H. L. Meadow (Ed.), Developments in quality-of-life studies (Vol. 1, p. 65). Blacksburg, VA: International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies.Google Scholar
  47. Novaco, R. W. (1992). Automobile driving and aggressive behaviour. In M. Wachs & M. Crawford (Eds.), The car and the city: The automobile, the built environment, and daily urban life (pp. 234–247). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  48. Novaco, R. W., & Collier, C. (1994). Commuting stress, ridesharing, and gender: Analyses from the 1993 state of the commute study in Southern California. Transportation Board Research, 1433, 170–176.Google Scholar
  49. Novaco, R. W., Kliewer, W., & Broquet, A. (1991). Home environmental consequences of commute travel impedance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 881–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Novaco, R. W., Stokols, D., & Milanesi, L. (1990). Objective and subjective dimensions of travel impedance as determinants of commuting stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rahtz, D. R., & Sirgy, M. J. (2000). Marketing of health care within a community: A quality-of-life needs assessment model and method. Journal of Business Research, 49, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rahtz, D. R., Sirgy, M. J., & Lee, D.-J. (2004). Further validation and extension and the quality-of-life/community-healthcare model and measures. Social Indicators Research, 69, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Raphael, D., Renwick, R., Brown, I., & Rootman, I. (1996). Quality of life indicators and health: Current status and emerging conceptions. Social Indicators Research, 39, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rogers, S. H., Halstead, J. M., Gardner, K. H., & Carlson, C. H. (2011). Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the municipal and neighbourhood scales. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Royuela, V., Surinach, J., & Reyes, M. (2003). Measuring quality of lofe in small areas over different periods of time: Analysis of the province of Barcelona. Social Indicators Research, 64, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Santos, L. D., Martins, I., & Brito, P. (2007). Measuring subjective quality of life: A survey to Porto’s residents. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Shin, D. C. (1980). Subjective indicators and the comparative evaluation of the quality of community life. American Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sirgy, M. J. (2011). Theoretical perspectives guiding QOL indicator projects. Social Indicators Research, 103, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life: Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and eudomania. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sirgy, M. J., Cole, D. Kosenko, R., Meadow, H. L., Rahtz, D., Cicic, M., et al. (1995). Developing a life satisfaction measure based on need hierarchy theory. In M. J. Sirgy & A. C. Samli (Eds.), New dimensions of marketing and quality of life (pp. 3–26). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2001). Further validation of the Sirgy et al.’s measure of community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 56, 125–143.Google Scholar
  64. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59, 79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sirgy, M. J., Gao, T., & Young, R. F. (2008). How does residents’ satisfaction with community services influence quality of life (QOL) outcomes? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sirgy, M. J., Rahtz, D. R., Cicic, M., & Underwood, R. (2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: A quality-of-life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49, 279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sirgy, M. J., Widgery, R. N., Lee, D.-J., & Yu, G. B. (2010). Developing a measure of community well-being based on perceptions of impact in various life domains. Social Indicators Research, 96, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sirgy, M. J., & Wu, J. (2009). The pleasant life, the engaged life, and the meaningful life: What about the balanced life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stoeckler, H. S. (1977). Aesthetic quality of home interior—a useful indicator of housing satisfaction and other quality of life measures. Journal of Interior Design Education and Research, 3, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stoeckler, H. S., & Larntz, K. (1986). Cross-cultural differences in relationships among satisfaction with aesthetic quality of dwelling interior, overall housing, and quality of life. In J. L. Hafstrom (Ed.), Compendium of quality of life research (pp. 122–135). Urbana, IL: Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  71. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Baarsma, B. E. (2005). Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. The Economic Journal, 115, 224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Varady, D. P., & Carrozza, M. A. (2000). Toward a better way to measure customer satisfaction levels in public housing: A report from Cincinnati. Unpublished manuscrpt.Google Scholar
  73. Vera-Toscano, E., & Ateca-Amestoy, V. (2008). The relevance of social interactions on housing. Social Indicators Research, 86, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wagner, S. (1995, September). Cities that satisfy. American Demographics, 17, 18–20.Google Scholar
  75. Walton, D., Murray, S. J., & Thomas, J. A. (2008). Relationships between population density and the perceived quality of neighbourhood. Social Indicators Research, 89, 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Westaway, M. S. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of satisfaction with personal and environmental quality of life in an informal South African housing settlement, Doornkop, Soweto. Habitat International, 30, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wu, C-H. (2008). The role of perceived discrepancy in satisfaction evaluation. Social Indicators Research, 88, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yetim, N., & Yetim, U. (2014). Sense of community and individual well-being: A research on fulfillment of needs and social capital in the Turkish community. Social Indicators Research, 115, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing, Pamplin College of BusinessVirginia Polytechnic Institute & State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations