Advertisement

Do People Adapt to Poorer Health? Health and Health Satisfaction over the Life Cycle

  • Richard A. EasterlinEmail author
Chapter
  • 455 Downloads
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 60)

Abstract

As people get older, health deteriorates and so too does satisfaction with health. Moreover, differences in health and health satisfaction by gender are positively associated, as are differences by race, education, and cohort. These findings are based on an analysis of data from the United States General Social Survey.

The set point theory of psychology asserts that people adapt rapidly and completely to poorer health. If this were so, then satisfaction with health should be unaffected by changes or differences in actual health. The empirical results of the present analysis suggest that there is some adaptation to poorer health, but they do not support the view of set point theory that adaptation is rapid and complete.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Setpoint theory Adaptation Life cycle Health Health satisfaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for the assistance of Donna Hokoda Ebata, Pouyan Mashayekh-Ahangarani, and Shaked Peleg. Financial support was provided by the University of Southern California.

References

  1. Argyle, M., 1987. The Psychology of Happiness. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  2. Brickman, P. D. Coates and R. Janoff-Bulman, 1978. “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costa, Paul T. Jr. and Robert R. McCrae, 1980. “Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on Subjective Well-Being,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costa, Paul T. Jr., Alan B. Zonderman, Robert R. McCrae, Joan Cornoni-Huntley, Ben Z. Locke, and Helen E. Barbano, 1987. “Longitudinal Analyses of Psychological Well-Being in a National Sample: Stability of Mean Levels,” Journal of Gerontology, 42:1, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crimmins, Eileen M., Mark D. Hayward, and Teresa Seeman, 2004. “Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Health,” in N. Anderson, R. Bulatao, and B. Cohen, eds., Critical Perspectives on Race and Ethnic Differences in Health in Later Life, National Academy of Sciences, 310–352.Google Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi M, Hunter J (2003) Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies 4(2): 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins RA (2010) Subjective Wellbeing, Homeostatically Protected Mood and Depression: A Synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies 11(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins RA (2012). The Determinants of Happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development 1(1): 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, Ed, 1984. “Subjective Well-Being,” Psychological Bulletin, 45, 542–575.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, Ed, and Richard E. Lucas, 1999. “Personality and Subjective Well-Being,” in Daniel Kahneman, Ed Diener, and Norbert Schwarz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York: Russell Sage, 213–229.Google Scholar
  11. Diener E, Lucas RE, Scollon CN (2006) Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill: Revising the Adaptation Theory of Well-Being. American Psychologist 61(4): 305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwyer, Debra Sabatini and Olivia S. Mitchell, 1999. “Health Problems as Determinants of Retirement: Are Self-Rated Measures Endogenous?” Journal of Health Economics 18, 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Golini, Antonio and Plautilla Calvani, 2001. Relationships Between Perceptions of Health, Chronic Diseases and Disabilities, Nihon University, Population Research Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Headey, Bruce and Alexander Wearing, 1989. “Personality, Life Events, and Subjective Well-Being: Toward a Dynamic Equilibrium Model,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57:4, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Headey B (2010), The set point theory of well-being has serious flaws: On the eve of a scientific revolution? Social Indicators Research (97): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Headey B, Muffles R, Wagner GG (2010). Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(42): 17922–17926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Idler, Ellen L. and Yael Banyamini, 1997. “Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38:1 (March), 21–37.Google Scholar
  18. Idler, Ellen L. and Stanislav V. Kasl, 1995. “Self-Ratings of Health: Do They Also Predict Change in Functional Ability?” Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 50B(6), S344–S353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahneman, Daniel, Ed Diener, and Norbert Schwarz, eds., 1999. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Lucas, RE (2007). Adaptation and the Set-Point Model of Subjective Well-Being: Does Happiness Change after Major Life Events? Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(2): 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lykken, David and Auke Tellegen, 1996. “Happiness is a Stochastic Phenomenon,” Psychological Science, 7:3 (May), 180–189.Google Scholar
  22. McNeil, Jack, 1997. “Americans with Disabilities,” U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, Series P-70-73, Household Economic Studies, 1–17.Google Scholar
  23. Michalos, A. C., 1985. “Multiple Discrepancies Theory (MDT).” Social Indicators Research 16(4), 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michalos, A.C. and Bruno Zumbo, 2002. “Healthy Days, Health Satisfaction and Satisfaction with Overall Quality of Life,” Social Indicators Research, 59(3), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mehnert, Thomas, Herbert H. Kraus, Rosemary Nadler, and Mary Boyd, 1990. “Correlates of Life Satisfaction in Those with Disabling Conditions”, Rehabilitation Psychology, 35(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Myers, David G., 1992. The Pursuit of Happiness. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  27. National Opinion Research Center, 2011. General Social Surveys, 1972–2010. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  28. Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2009. “What Happens to People Before and After Disability? Focusing Effects, Lead Effects and Adaptation in Different Areas of Life,” Social Science and Medicine 69, 1834–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reynolds, Sandra L., Eileen M. Crimmins, and Yasuhiko Saito, 1998. “Cohort Differences in Disability and Disease Presence,” The Gerontologist, 38:5, 578–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, V. Kerry, Donald H. Taylor, Jr., and Frank A. Sloan, 2001. “Longevity Expectations and Death: Can People Predict their Own Demise?” American Economic Review 91:4 (September), 1126–1134.Google Scholar
  31. Yap SCY, Anusic I, Lucas RE (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Journal of Research in Personality 46: 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations