Advertisement

Challenges, Needs and Risks in Defining Wellbeing Indicators

  • Filomena MagginoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 60)

Abstract

Actually, crossing Alex’s scientific life corresponded also to crossing the renewed worldwide debate on the role of social indicators in promoting the wellbeing of individual and nations. My contribution to this collection re-considers some reflections I already wrote on measuring progress of societies.

Since several decades, many researchers all over the world have been continuously working on defining concepts and measures able to measure and monitor the wellbeing of nations.

Actually what emerges clearly is that the change of paradigm introduces several methodological implications in identifying indicators. Actually, monitoring wellbeing through indicators introduces some issues representing at the same time a challenge (given by the complexity), a need (represented by the relativization) and a risk (given by the over-reductionism).

This work, fruit of previous reflections, aims at clarifying and disentangling these issues by remarking that the key allowing for the proper identification of new measures lies in the players’ (statisticians, researchers, analysts, policy makers, and so on) capacity and awareness in considering complexity, avoiding over-reductionism and investigating relativization.

This contribution to this collection represents actually a small sign of tribute from my side to Alex.

Keywords

Measuring wellbeing of nations Indicators of wellbeing Quality of life 

References

  1. Allison, D. B., Alfonso, V. C., & Dunn, G. M. (1991, January) “The extended satisfaction with life scale”, The Behavioral Therapist, 15–16.Google Scholar
  2. Anand, S., Sen A. (1997) “Concepts of Human Development and Poverty: A Multidimensional Perspective” Human Development Papers 1997, UNDP.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, F. M. & Withey, S. B. (1976) Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality, New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyle, M., (1987). The Psychology of Happiness, Methuen, London (trad. it. Psicologia della felicità, Cortina Editore, Milano).Google Scholar
  5. Berger-Schmitt R. and H.-H. Noll (2000) Conceptual Framework and Structure of a European System of Social Indicators, EuReporting Working Paper No. 9, Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA) – Social Indicators Department, Mannheim.Google Scholar
  6. Bradburn N.M. (1969) The Structure of Psychological Well-being. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Diener E., E. Suh (1997) “Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators”, Social Indicators Research, vol. 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener E. and Emmons R.A. (1984). “The independence of positive and negative affect”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (5).Google Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Lucas R.E., Schimmack U., Helliwell J. (2008) Well-Being for Public Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat (2000a) Definition of quality in Statistics, Eurostat Working Group on Assessment of Quality in Statistics, Eurostat/A4/Quality/00/General/Definition, Luxembourg, April 4–5.Google Scholar
  11. Eurostat (2000b) Standard Quality Report, Eurostat Working Group on Assessment of Quality in Statistics, Eurostat/A4/Quality/00/General/Standard Report, Luxembourg, April 4–5.Google Scholar
  12. Felce D., Perry J. (1995). “Quality of Life: Its Definition and Measurement”. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16 (1), pp. 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giovannini E., A. Morrone, T. Rondinella, L.L. Sabbadini (2012) “L’iniziativa CNEL-ISTAT per la misurazione del Benessere Equo e Sostenibile in Italia” in Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, n. 1, Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
  14. Horn R.V., (1993) Statistical Indicators, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson S. (2002). “Conceptualizing and Measuring Quality of Life for National Policy”. Social Indicators Research, 58.Google Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D. and Krueger, A. B. (2006) “Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1).Google Scholar
  17. Maggino F. (2009) The state of the art in indicators construction in the perspective of a comprehensive approach in measuring well-being of societies, Firenze University Press, Archivio E-Prints, Firenze.Google Scholar
  18. Noll H.-H. (2004) Social indicators and indicators systems: tools for social monitoring and reporting, paper presented at OECD, World Forum “Statistics, knowledge and policy”, Palermo, 10–13 November 2004.Google Scholar
  19. Nuvolati G. (1997). Uno specifico settore di applicazione degli indicatori sociali: La qualità della vita. In: Zajczyk F. Il mondo degli indicatori sociali, una guida alla ricerca sulla qualità della vita. La Nuova Italia Scientifica, Roma, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar
  20. Nuvolati G. (2002). Qualità della vita e indicatori sociali. Seminar held at the PhD degree programme “Scienza tecnologia e società”, aprile, Dipartimento di Sociologia e di Scienza Politica, Università della Calabria. Available on http://www.sociologia.unical.it/convdottorati/nuvolati.pdf
  21. Patel S., M. Hiraga, and L. Wang (World Bank) D. Drew and D. Lynd (Unesco) (2003) A Framework for Assessing the Quality of Education Statistics, Development Data Group and Human Development Network, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  22. Sharpe A., J. Salzman (2004) Methodological Choices Encountered in the Construction of Composite Indices of Economic and Social Well-Being, Center for the Study of Living Standards, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  23. Sirgy M.J. (2011) “Theoretical Perspectives Guiding QoL Indicators Project”, Social Indicators Research, vol. 103, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sirgy M.J., A.C. Michalos, A.L. Ferriss, R.A. Easterlin, D. Patrick and W. Pavot (2006) “The Quality-of-Life (QOL) Research Movement: Past, Present, and Future”, Social Indicators Research, vol. 76, n.3, 343–466.Google Scholar
  25. Śleszyński, J. (2012) Prospects for synthetic sustainable development indicators, paper presented at the conference “Quality of Life and Sustainable Development”, September 20–21, Wroclaw (Poland).Google Scholar
  26. Stiglitz J. E., A. Sen & J.-P. Fitoussi eds (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm
  27. Veenhoven, R. (1994) “Is happiness a trait? Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier” Social Indicators Research, 32(2).Google Scholar
  28. Zapf W. (1975) “Le système d’indicateurs sociaux: approches et problèmes”, Revue Internationale des Sciences Sociales, Vol. XXVII, n. 3.Google Scholar
  29. Zapf W. (1984) “Individuelle Wohlfahrt: Lebensbedingungen und Wahrgenommene Lebensqualität”, in W. Glatzer e Zapf W. (eds.) Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik, Frankfurt a. M. – New York, Campus, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni “G. Parenti” (DiSIA)Università degli Studi di FirenzeFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations