Skip to main content

How Do User Groups Cope with Delay in Real-Time Collaborative Note Taking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

A property of general interest of real-time collaborative editors is delay. Delays exist between the execution of one user’s modification and the visibility of this modification to the other users. Such delays are in part fundamental to the network, as well as arising from the consistency maintenance algorithms and underlying architecture of collaborative editors. Existing quantitative research on collaborative document editing does not examine either concern for delay or the efficacy of compensatory strategies. We studied an artificial note taking task in French where we introduced simulated delay. We found out a general effect of delay on performance related to the ability to manage redundancy and errors across the document. We interpret this finding as a compromised ability to maintain awareness of team member activity, and a reversion to independent work. Measures of common ground in accompanying chat indicate that groups with less experienced team members attempt to compensate for the effect of delay. In contrast, more experienced groups do not adjust their communication in response to delay, and their performance remains sensitive to the delay manipulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 12 min interview is available online at the following url: https://interstices.info/jcms/i_60795/calculer-dans-les-nuages.

  2. 2.

    Reverso tool is available on-line at http://www.reverso.net/.

References

  • Ahmed-Nacer, M., Ignat, C.-L., Oster, G., Roh, H.-G., & Urso, P. (2011). Evaluating CRDTs for real-time document editing. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Symposium on Document Engineering—DocEng 2011 (pp. 103–112). Mountain View, CA, USA: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, L., Martin, S., Oster, G., & Ignat. C.-L. (2013). Supporting adaptable granularity of changes for massive-scale collaborative editing. In: International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing—CollaborateCom 2013 (pp. 50–59). Austin, TX, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnholtz, J. P., Steinhardt, S. B., & Pavese, A. (2013). Write here, write now!: An experimental study of group maintenance in collaborative writing. In: ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI 2013 (pp. 961–970). Paris, France: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and points of view. In: Subject and Topic (pp. 25–55). USA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In: Discourse Production and Comprehension (pp. 1–40). New York: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addresses for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimroth, C., Andorno, C., Benazzo, S., & Verhagen, J. (2010). Given claims about new topics: How romance and germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3328–3344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI 1992 (pp. 541–547). Monterey, CA, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drijkoningen, F., & Kampers-Manhe, B. (2012). Word order in French and the influence of topic and focus. Linguistics, 50(1), 65–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of ACM, 34(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., Prangsma, M., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 463–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. R. (2010). Marking the turn: Obligation, engagement, and alienation in group discussions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 132–151.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, T. N., Phillips, W. G., & Wolfe, C. (2006). Quality analysis of distribution architectures for synchronous groupware. In: International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing—CollaborateCom2006. Atlanta, GA, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwin, C. (2001). The effects of network delays on group work in real-time groupware. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work—ECSCW 2001 (pp. 299–318). Bonn, Germany: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwin, C., Benford, S., Dyck, J., Fraser, M., Vaghi, I., & Greenhalgh, C. (2004). Revealing delay in collaborative environments. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI 2004 (pp. 503–510). Vienna, Austria: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignat, C.-L., & Norrie, M. C. (2008). Multi-level editing of hierarchical documents. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17(5–6), 423–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignat, C.-L., Oster, G., Newman, M., Shalin, V., & Charoy, F. (2014). Studying the effect of delay on group performance in collaborative editing. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering—CDVE 2014 (pp. 191–198). Mallorca, Spain: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karat, C.-M., Halverson, C., Horn, D., & Karat, J. (1999). Patterns of entry and correction in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI 1999 (pp. 568–575). Pittsburgh, PA, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noël, S., & Robert, J.-M. (2004). Empirical study on collaborative writing: What do co-authors do, use, and like? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13(1), 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2), 139–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrøsten, M., & Carter, M. (1993). Groupwork close up: A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(4), 321–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, M., Cart, M., & Ferrié. J. (1998). Concurrent operations in a distributed and mobile collaborative environment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering—ICDE 1998 (pp. 36–45). Orlando, FL, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., Jia, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., & Chen, D. (1998). Achieving convergence, causality preservation, and intention preservation in real-time cooperative editing systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5(1), 63–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammaro, S. G., Mosier, J. N., Goodwin, N. C., & Spitz, G. (1997). Collaborative writing is hard to support: A field study of collaborative writing. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 6(1), 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, S., Vachon, F., Lafond, D., & Kramer, C. (2012). Dealing with task interruptions in complex dynamic environments: Are two heads better than one? Human Factors, 54(1), 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaghi, I., Greenhalgh, C., & Benford, S. (1999). Coping with inconsistency due to network delays in collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology—VRST 1999 (pp. 42–49). London, United Kingdom: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for financial support of the USCoast Inria associate team, the Inria internships programme and the research program ANR-10-SEGI-010 and for sabbatical support from the Department of Psychology, Wright State University. The authors thank Vinh Quang Dang for his help on simulations with GoogleDocs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia-Lavinia Ignat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ignat, CL., Oster, G., Fox, O., Shalin, V.L., Charoy, F. (2015). How Do User Groups Cope with Delay in Real-Time Collaborative Note Taking. In: Boulus-Rødje, N., Ellingsen, G., Bratteteig, T., Aanestad, M., Bjørn, P. (eds) ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20498-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20499-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics