Advertisement

Bacteriological Diagnosis

  • Guadalupe García-Elorriaga
  • Guillermo del Rey-Pineda
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Microbiology book series (BRIEFSMICROBIOL)

Abstract

Sample collection and handling influences the sensitivity of the different microbiological techniques employed. Whenever possible, samples should be collected before beginning chemotherapy, in open areas or in well-ventilated rooms. Despite the advances made in the past 30 years in the microbiological techniques used for diagnosing TB, only a small portion of the global world population can benefit from them. The main diagnostic method in low- or middle-income countries is smear microscopy with the Ziehl–Neelsen technique, due to its simplicity, rapidity, reproducibility, low cost, and effectiveness in detecting infectious patients. The other basic diagnostic technique of TB is culture, the only available method that can establish a definitive diagnosis and that can be used for close patient follow-up and to confirm final cure. Culture, moreover, is more sensitive than smear microscopy. Biochemical techniques, chromatography, and genetic probes can be used to identify different mycobacterial species. However, only biochemical testing is routinely used in low- or middle-income countries due to its lower cost; these methods, however, may be complicated to perform; they yield results slowly and lack reproducibility. In low- or middle-income countries, drug sensitivity should be determined following Canetti’s method of proportions in Löwenstein–Jensen medium. Reading should be obtained after 4–5 weeks, and the laboratory must inform the clinician on the sample’s level of growth in the medium with added antituberculous drugs and in comparison to the medium without medication.

Keywords

Acid-fast bacilli Drug susceptibility testing Löwenstein–Jensen culture MB/BacT system MGIT MODS 

References

  1. 1.
    American Thoracic Society. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:1376–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernard C, Wichlacz C, Rigoreau M, Sorhouet S, Dagiral R, Jarlier V, et al. Evaluation of the Fluo-RAL module for detection of tuberculous and nontuberculous acid-fast bacilli by fluorescence microscopy. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:3469–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis JL, Cattamanchi A, Cuevas LE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of same-day microscopy versus standard microscopy for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:147–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    García-Elorriaga G, Carrillo-Montes G, del Rey-Pineda G, González-Bonilla C. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from respiratory simples with the liquid culture system MB/BacT and verified by PCR. Rev Invest Clin. 2006;58:573–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ling DI, Flores LL, Riley LW, Pai M. Commercial nucleic-acid amplification tests for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in respiratory specimens: meta-analysis and meta-regression. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1536.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maurya AK, Nag VL, Kant S, Kushwaha RA, Kumar M, Mishra V, et al. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic test for discrimination between Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex & non tuberculous mycobacteria in clinical isolates from extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135:901–6.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Tuberculosis: clinical diagnosis and management of tuberculosis, and measures for its prevention and control. NICE Clinical Guideline 117. London: NICE; 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pfyffer GE, Palicova F. Chapter 28: Mycobacterium: general characteristics, laboratory detection, and staining procedures. In: Versalovic J, editor. Manual of clinical microbiology. 10th ed. Washington: ASM Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V, et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:570–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, et al. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1, CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    TB CARE I. International standards for tuberculosis care. 3rd ed. The Hague: TB CARE I; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guadalupe García-Elorriaga
    • 1
  • Guillermo del Rey-Pineda
    • 2
  1. 1.Mexican Social Security Institute, IMSSNational Medical Center La Raza, CMNRMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Department of InfectologyFederico Gomez Children’s HospitalMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations