Skip to main content

Evaluating Price Risk Mitigation Strategies for an Oil and Gas Company

  • Conference paper
Computational Management Science

Abstract

Financial hedging strategies are one of the preferred practices to protect oil and gas companies from prices’ volatility. The common approach consists in each business unit (e.g. crude exploration, natural gas, and refining) protecting itself against its own price risks. According to the “theory of syndicates” risk aggregation, and assuming that the risk tolerance assessment process is applied to every business unit, it is not clear whether separate hedging portfolio selections achieve a better risk protection than selection at company level. In this paper Copula-GARCH models are used to capture prices’ correlation and volatility, while business unit earnings are generated through Monte Carlo simulation. Optimal hedging portfolios are achieved with stochastic optimization over utility functions. We confront the business units’ portfolios through coherent risk measures against a portfolio for the whole company, which reveals to be the best option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Administration, E.I.: Derivatives and Risk Management in the Petroleum, Natural Gas and Electricity Industries. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belton, V., Stewart, T.J.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer, New York (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Tal, A., Teboulle, M.: Expected utility penalty functions and duality in stochastic nonlinear programming. Manag. Sci. 32(11), 1445–1446 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollerslev, T.: Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J. Econ. 31(3), 307–327 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fermanian, J.D.: Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas. J. Multivar. Anal. 95(1), 119–152 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard, R.A.: Decision analysis: practice and promise. Manag. Sci. 34(6), 679–695 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jondeau, E., Rockinger, M.: The copula-garch model of conditional dependencies: an international stock market application. J. Int. Money Financ. 25(5), 827–853 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkwood, C.W.: Approximating risk aversion in decision analysis applications. Decis. Anal. 1(1), 51–67 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ModelRisk: Vose-sofware. http://www.vosesoftware.com/ (2012)

  11. Platts: Market data - oil. http://www.platts.com/ (2012)

  12. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3), 21–41 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sklar, A.: Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Stat. Univ. Paris 8, 229–231 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  14. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, R.: The theory of syndicates. Econometrica 36(1), 119–132 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to António Quintino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Quintino, A., Lourenço, J.C., Catalão-Lopes, M. (2016). Evaluating Price Risk Mitigation Strategies for an Oil and Gas Company. In: Fonseca, R., Weber, GW., Telhada, J. (eds) Computational Management Science. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 682. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20430-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics