Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Nathan Sivin
Part of the Archimedes book series (ARIM, volume 43)

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the main conclusions of the study: classical medicine played a very small direct role in the ailments of the population as a whole; there is a remarkable extent of overlap between therapies that originated in different religious milieux; the classical view of the body, its processes, and its disorders in the eleventh century was strikingly different from that of both pre-modern European medicine and biomedicine; the health-care initiatives of the time were compromised by officials’ persecution of popular ritualists in the south and elsewhere, and by the inconsistency with which medical policies were applied. With respect to the social and political setting, despite the considerable sharing and appropriation of therapeutic methods, one cannot speak of a health care system, for there was no integration; and one cannot assume that state edicts were obeyed or even enforced throughout the empire. The chapter finally outlines several desirable next steps in understanding ancient health care.

Keywords

Local Official Eleventh Century Popular Cure Remarkable Extent Local Temple 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

Abbreviations

  1. DZ = Volume number in Daozang Google Scholar
  2. ES = Ersishi shi 二十四史 of Zhonghua Shuju, 1959–1977.Google Scholar
  3. HY = text in Harvard-Yenching Concordance seriesGoogle Scholar
  4. j. = juan 卷 (chapter)Google Scholar
  5. RW = published by Renmin Weisheng Chubanshe 人民衛生出版社, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  6. S = Title number in Schipper 1975Google Scholar
  7. SQ = Siku quanshu 四庫全書Google Scholar
  8. SV = Schipper & Verellen 2004Google Scholar
  9. T = Taishō shinshū Daizōkyō 大正新修大藏經Google Scholar
  10. UP = University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. YZ = Yi tong zheng mai quan shu 醫統正脈全書Google Scholar
  12. ZD = Volume, item, juan, and page numbers in Zhonghua daozang 中华道藏Google Scholar
  13. ZS = published by Zhonghua shuju 中華書局, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  14. ZZ = Zhongyi zhenben congshu 中醫珍本叢書 ed.Google Scholar
  15. Hanson, Marta. 2011. Speaking of Epidemics in Chinese Medicine. Disease and the Geographic Imagination in Late Imperial China. Needham Research Institute Series, 9. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hymes, Robert, & Conrad Schirokauer, eds. 1993. Ordering the World: Approaches to State and Society in Sung Dynasty China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn, Dieter. 2009. The Age of Confucian Rule. The Song Transformation of China. History of Imperial China. Belknap Press of Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  18. Skinner, G. William. 1985. Presidential Address: The Structure of Chinese History. Journal of Asian Studies 44. 2: 271–292.Google Scholar
  19. Sun, Xiaochun 孫小淳. 2007. State and Science: Scientific Innovations in Northern Song China, 960–1127. Ph.D. dissertation, History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  20. Sun, Xiaochun & Zeng Xiongsheng 曾雄生, eds. 2007. Songdai guojia wenhua zhong de kexue 宋代国家文化中的科学 (Science and the State in the Song Dynasty). Beijing: Zhongguo Kexue Jishu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  21. Zimmerman, Francis. 1978. From Classic Texts to Learned Practice: Methodological Remarks on the Study of Indian Medicine. Social Science and Medicine 12: 97–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan Sivin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations