Skip to main content

The Strange Psychology of Pricing

  • Chapter
Confessions of the Pricing Man
  • 2930 Accesses

Abstract

The principles of classical economics assume that buyers and sellers act rationally. Suppliers try to maximize their profits, while buyers try to maximize their value, or their “utility” in the vernacular of the economist. Under these principles, all parties have complete information. The sellers know how the buyer will respond to different prices, which means that they know their demand curves. The buyers know all available alternatives and their prices, and can make qualified judgments on the utility that each alternative provides, independent of its price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Herbert Simon and I are not related.

  2. 2.

    Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: pp. 263–291.

  3. 3.

    Tversky (1937–1996) had passed away by that time.

  4. 4.

    Müller K-M (2012) NeuroPricing. Haufe-Lexware, Freiburg.

  5. 5.

    Ariely D (2010) Predictably irrational. Harper Perennial Edition, New York.

  6. 6.

    Shiv B, Carrnon Z, Ariely D (2005) Placebo effects of marketing actions: consumer may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, pp. 383–393, November 2005, here p. 391.

  7. 7.

    Cialdini RB (1993) Influence: science and practice. Harper Collins, New York.

  8. 8.

    Schwarzenegger A (2013) Total recall: my unbelievably true life story. Simon & Schuster, New York, p. 119.

  9. 9.

    Mussweiler T, Strack F, Pfeiffer T (2000) Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, pp. 1142–1150.

  10. 10.

    ibidem, p. 1143.

  11. 11.

    Huber J, Puto C (1983) Market boundaries and product choice: illustrating attraction and substitution effects. Journal of Consumer Research 10: pp. 31–44.

  12. 12.

    Trevisan E (2013) The irrational consumer: applying behavioural economics to your business strategy. Gower Publishing, Farnham Surrey (UK).

  13. 13.

    Trevisan E (2012) The impact of behavioral pricing. Presentation at the Simon-Kucher University, August 14, 2012, Bonn.

  14. 14.

    Simon-Kucher & Partners project from 2011, led by Dr. Philip Biermann.

  15. 15.

    Kucher E (1985) Scannerdaten und Preissensitivität bei Konsumgütern. Gabler-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

  16. 16.

    Diller H, Brambach G Die Entwicklung der Preise und Preisfiguren nach der Euro-Einführung im Konsumgüter-Einzelhandel. In Handel im Fokus: Mitteilungen des Instituts für Handelsforschung an der Universität zu Köln 54(2): pp. 228–238.

  17. 17.

    Rotkäppchen-Mumm steigert Absatz. LZnet, April 26, 2005; Rotkäppchen will nach Rekordjahr Preise erhöhen; Jeder dritte Sekt stammt aus dem ostdeutschen Konzern; Neuer Rosé; Mumm verliert weiter. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, April 26, 2006, p. 23; and Sekt löst Turbulenzen aus. LZnet, November 29, 2007.

  18. 18.

    Price elasticity is usually a negative number, because normally volume rises when prices falls and vice versa. But for simplicity’s sake, we generally leave off the negative sign and just write the absolute value.

  19. 19.

    Ginzberg E (1936) Customary prices. American Economic Review (2): pp. 296.

  20. 20.

    Dean J (1951) Managerial economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p. 490 f.

  21. 21.

    Kucher E (1985) Scannerdaten und Preissensitivität bei Konsumgütern. Gabler, Wiesbaden, p. 40.

  22. 22.

    Anderson ET, Simester DI (2003) Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales , evidence from field experiment s. Quantitative Marketing and Economics (1): pp. 93–110.

  23. 23.

    Gabor A, Granger CWJ (1964) Price sensitivity of the consumer. Journal of Advertising Research (4): pp. 40–44.

  24. 24.

    Hirsch J (2009) Objects in store are smaller than they appear. Los Angeles Times, November 9, 2008.

  25. 25.

    Ben and Jerry’s Calls Out Haagen-Dazs on Shrinkage. Advertising Age, March 9, 2009.

  26. 26.

    Diller H, Brielmaier A (1996) Die Wirkung gebrochener und runder Preise: Ergebnisse eines Feldexperiments im Drogeriewarensektor. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, July/August, pp. 695–710.

  27. 27.

    Gedenk K, Sattler H (1999) Preisschwellen und Deckungsbeitrag – Verschenkt der Handel große Potentiale? Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, January, pp. 33–59.

  28. 28.

    Müller-Hagedorn L, Wierich R (2005) Preisschwellen bei auf 9-endenden Preisen? Eine Analyse des Preisgünstigkeitsurteils. Arbeitspapier Nr. 15, Universtität zu Köln, Seminar für Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Handel und Distribution, Köln, p. 5.

  29. 29.

    von Kalckreuth U, Schmidt T, Stix H (2011) Using cash to monitor liquidity-implications for payments, currency demand and withdrawal behavior. Discussion Paper Nr. 22/2011. Deutsche Bundesbank, October 2011.

  30. 30.

    McCartney S (2014) The airport lounge arms race. The Wall Street Journal, March 5, 2014.

  31. 31.

    Schmidt-Gallas D, Orlovska L (2012) Pricing psychology: findings from the insurance industry. Journal of Professional Pricing (4): pp. 10–14.

  32. 32.

    Gourville JT, Soman D (1998) Payment depreciation: the behavioral effects of temporally separating payments from consumption. Journal of Consumer Research (2): pp. 160-174.

  33. 33.

    Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (3): p. 119, and Thaler RH (1994) Quasi-rational economics. Russell Sage, New York; see also Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Penguin, London.

  34. 34.

    Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481): pp. 453–458.

  35. 35.

    Müller K-M (2012) NeuroPricing. Haufe-Lexware, Freiburg.

  36. 36.

    Ibidem.

  37. 37.

    Die Ökonomen haben ihre Erzählung widerrufen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. February 16, 2013, p 40.

  38. 38.

    Beck H (2013) Der Mensch ist kein kognitiver Versager. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. February 11, 2013, p. 18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, H. (2015). The Strange Psychology of Pricing. In: Confessions of the Pricing Man. Copernicus, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20400-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics