Advertisement

Assessment of ETICS’ Surface Humidification

  • Eva BarreiraEmail author
  • Vasco Peixoto de Freitas
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

Different models for the coupled heat, air and moisture (HAM) transport have been developed and incorporated into various software programs used in the field of porous building materials. However, most of the hygrothermal models available to the public in general are not able to simulate accurately the hygrothermal behaviour of ETICS, namely the undercooling phenomenon, responsible for external surface condensation, and the effect of rain incident on the façade.

Keywords

Direct Solar Radiation Surface Condensation Water Vapour Partial Pressure Diffuse Solar Radiation Porous Building Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adan O (1994) On the fungal defacement of interior finishes. Ph.D thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  2. Barreira E, Freitas VP (2014) The effect of nearby obstacles in surface condensations on external thermal insulation composite systems: experimental and numerical study. J Build Phys 37(3):269–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barreira E, Delgado JMPQ, Freitas VP (2013) Wetting and drying of external surfaces with ETICS systems. Defect Diffus Forum 334–335:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delgado JMPQ, Ramos NMM, Barreira E, Freitas VP (2010) A critical review of hygrothermal models used in porous building materials. J Porous Med 13(3):221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finkenstein C, Haupl P (2007) Atmospheric long wave radiation being a climatic boundary condition in hygrothermal building part simulation. In:12th symposium for building physics, vol 2, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany, pp 617–624Google Scholar
  6. Gaylarde CC, Gaylarde PM (2005) A comparative study of the major microbial biomass of biofilms on exteriors of buildings in Europe and Latin America. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 55:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hagentoft C-E (2001) Introduction to building physics. Studentlitteratur, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  8. Haubner N, Schumann R, Karsten U (2006) Aeroterrestrial microalgae growing in biofilms on facades—Response to temperature and water stress. Microb Ecol 51(2):285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. John DM (1988) Algae growths on buildings: a general review and methods of treatment. Biodeterioration 2:81–102Google Scholar
  10. Kehrer M, Schmidt T (2008) Radiation effects on exterior surfaces. In: Proceeding of the 8th symposium on building physics in the Nordic countries, vol 1, DTU, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 2008 pp 207–212,Google Scholar
  11. Künzel H (1995) Simultaneous heat and moisture transport in building components—One and two-dimensional calculation using simple parameters. IRB Verlag, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. Künzel H, Schmidt Th, Holm A (2002), Exterior surface temperature of different wall constructions—comparison of numerical simulation and experiment. In: Proceedings of the 11th symposium of building physics, vol 1, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany, September 2002, pp 441–449Google Scholar
  13. Lengsfeld K., Krus M. (2004) Microorganisms on facades—reasons, consequences and measures. IEA—Annex 41 “Moist-Eng” Meeting, Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin M, Berdahl P (1984) Characteristics of infrared sky radiation in the United States. Sol Energy 33:321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nore K, Blocken B, Jelle B, Thue J, Carmeliet J (2007) A dataset of wind-driven rain measurements on a low-rise test building in Norway. Build Environ 42:2150–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sedlbauer K (2001) Prediction of mould manifestation on and in building parts. University of Stuttgart, Germany, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  17. Venzmer H, von Werder J, Lesnych N, Koss L (2008) Algal defacement of façade materials – Results of long term natural weathering tests obtained by new diagnostic tools. In: 8th symposium on building physics in the nordic countries, vol 1, DTU, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 2008, pp 277–284Google Scholar
  18. Viitanen H. (1996) Factors affecting the development of mould and brown rot decay in wooden material and wooden structures. In: Effect of humidity, temperature and exposure time. Dissertation, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  19. WUFI (2009) WUFI Pro 5. Fraunhofer—IBP, Holzhirchen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  20. Zheng R, Janssens A, Carmeliet J, Bogaerts W, Hens H (2004) An evaluation of highly insulated cold zinc roofs in a moderate humid region—Part I: Hygrothermal performance. Constr Build Mater 18(1):49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations