Advertisement

Introduction

  • Eva BarreiraEmail author
  • Vasco Peixoto de Freitas
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems—ETICS, have often been used in Europe since the 1970s, both in new buildings and in retrofitting. The popularity of this technology grew due to its advantages regarding other techniques of insulation. ETICS guarantees the reduction of the thermal bridges and greater thermal comfort due to the preservation of interior thermal inertia, providing a finished appearance similar to the traditional rendering. From the construction point of view, ETICS allows thinner exterior walls and increases the façades’ durability. To the pointed advantages, it must be added with three aspects that are very relevant in the construction industry: low cost, ease of application and possibility of installation without disturbing the building’s dwellers, which is particularly important in refurbishment.

Keywords

Biological Growth Terrestrial Surface Traditional Rendering Surface Condensation Grey Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barberousse H, Brayner R, Rego A, Castaing J, Saudou P, Colombet J (2007a) Adhesion of façade coating colonisers, as mediated by physico-chemical properties. Biofouling 23(1):15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barberousse H, Ruota B, Yéprémianb C, Boulonc G (2007b) An assessment of façade coatings against colonisation by aerial algae and cyanobacteria. Build Environ 42:2555–2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baronnie P (1983) Manuel de mise en oeuvre des enduits minces sur isolant. Isolation par l’extérieur. Le bon exemple de l’applicateur K’PLIC. CSTB, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker R (2003) Patterned staining of rendered facades: hygro-thermal analysis as a means for diagnosis. J Therm Envel Build Sci 26(4):321–341Google Scholar
  5. Blaich J (1999) La détérioration des bâtiments—Analyse et prévention. EMPA, Dübendorf, SuisseGoogle Scholar
  6. EOTA (2000) Guideline for European technical approval of external thermal insulation composite systems with rendering—ETAG 004. European Organization for Technical Approvals, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  7. Fleury F, Abraham B (1982) L’isolation thermique des façades par l’extérieur. CSTB, FranceGoogle Scholar
  8. Freitas VP (2002) Isolamento térmico de fachadas pelo exterior. Reboco delgado armado sobre poliestireno expandido—ETICS. Relatório HT 191A/02. Porto, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagentoft C-E (2001) Introduction to building physics. Studentlitteratur, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  10. Hens H, Carmeliet J (2002) Performance prediction for masonry walls with EIFS using calculation procedures and laboratory testing. J Therm Envel Build Sci 25:167–187Google Scholar
  11. Holm A, Zillig W, Künzel H (2004) Exterior surface temperature and humidity of walls—comparison of experiment and numerical simulation. In: Proceedings of performance of exterior envelopes of whole buildings IX, ASHRAE, Clearwater Beach, Florida, December 2004Google Scholar
  12. Hoppestad S (1955) Driving rain in Norway—report no. 13. Norwegian Building Research Institute, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  13. Johansson S, Wadsö L, Sandin K (2010) Estimation of mould growth levels on rendered façades based on surface relative humidity and surface temperature measurements. Build Environ 45(5):1153–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krus M, Rosler D, Sedlbauer K (2006) New model for the hygrothermal calculation of condensate on the external building surface. In: Proceedings of third international building physics conference—research in building physics and building engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada, 2006, pp 329–333Google Scholar
  15. Künzel H, Sedlbauer K (2001) Biological growth on stucco. In: Proceedings of performance of exterior envelopes of whole buildings VIII: integration of building envelopes, ASHRAE, clearwater beach, Florida, December 2001Google Scholar
  16. Künzel H, Kunzel HM, Sedlbauer K (2006) Long-term performance of external thermal insulation systems (ETICS). Architectura 5(1):11–24Google Scholar
  17. Nore K, Blocken B, Jelle B, Thue J, Carmeliet J (2007) A dataset of wind-driven rain measurements on a low-rise test building in Norway. Build Environ 42:2150–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Qualité Construction (n.d.) L’isolation thermique par l’exterieur—Enduit mince sur isolant. Agence Qualité Construction, FranceGoogle Scholar
  19. Sedlbauer K, Krus M (2002) Mold growth on ETICS (EIFS) as a result of ‘bad workmanship’? J Build Phys 26(2):117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Venzmer H, von Werder J, Lesnych N, Koss L (2008) Algal defacement of façade materials—results of long term natural weathering tests obtained by new diagnostic tools. In: 8th symposium on building physics in the Nordic countries, vol 1. DTU, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 2008, pp 277–284Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations