Skip to main content
  • 2015 Accesses

Abstract

There is abundant data supporting the clinical effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways (ERP). By combining multiple evidence-based interventions into a single multidisciplinary care package involving all perioperative phases, ERPs shorten hospitalization and reduce complications. In essence, ERPs represent a knowledge translation strategy to help get evidence into practice. Yet these pathways are complex, as they may contain up to 20 different perioperative elements, many of which are contrary to traditional surgical practice. Recent surveys of perioperative management practices for bowel resection in the USA reported that management remained fairly “conventional” for a large proportion of procedures, as the majority of cases in those studies still underwent bowel preparation and less than half received preoperative patient education. Like any significant change in practice, creating a culture of “enhanced recovery” requires vision, commitment, energy, planning, and (ideally) institutional support. Consensus must be achieved between all of involved care providers, and personnel must also be trained. A dedicated multidisciplinary team is ideal to synthesize the existing evidence into a practical and usable care pathway, as well as implement the pathway and perform continuous quality improvement. Substantial dedication is required from the multidisciplinary team members and a learning curve should be expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):667–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Millo J, Sgromo B, Marshall RE, Maynard ND. Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):413–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kagedan DJ, Ahmed M, Devitt KS, Wei AC. Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(1):11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malviya A, Martin K, Harper I, et al. Enhanced recovery program for hip and knee replacement reduces death rate. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(5):577–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Gerkin TM, et al. Association of surgical care practices with length of stay and use of clinical protocols after elective bowel resection: results of a national survey. Am J Surg. 2010;199(3):299–304. discussion 304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kehlet H, Buchler MW, Beart Jr RW, Billingham RP, Williamson R. Care after colonic operation—is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(1):45–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183(6):630–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, et al. The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(6):506–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94(2):224–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenbach R, Watson K, Pillai R. Transformational leadership in the context of organizational change. J Change Manag. 1999;12(2):80–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carli F, Charlebois P, Baldini G, Cachero O, Stein B. An integrated multidisciplinary approach to implementation of a fast-track program for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56(11):837–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li C, Ferri LE, Mulder DS, et al. An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy. Surgery. 2012;152(4):606–14. discussion 614-606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abou-Haidar H, Abourbih S, Braganza D, et al. Enhanced recovery pathway for radical prostatectomy: implementation and evaluation in a universal healthcare system. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8(11-12):418–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, et al. Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1015–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(4):482–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grol R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997;315(7105):418–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1995;222(1):73–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sjetne IS, Krogstad U, Odegard S, Engh ME. Improving quality by introducing enhanced recovery after surgery in a gynaecological department: consequences for ward nursing practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(3):236–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(7):851–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):868–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(6):879–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37(2):285–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37(2):259–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37(2):240–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Feldman LS, Lee L, Fiore Jr J. What outcomes are important in the assessment of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways? Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(2):120–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Health Literacy in Canada: a healthy understanding. 2008. http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/HealthLiteracy/HealthLiteracyReportFeb2008E.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2012.

  28. Carter F, Kennedy RH. Setting up an enhanced recovery programme. In: Francis N, editor. Manual of fast-track recovery for colorectal surgery. London: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Polle SW, Wind J, Fuhring JW, Hofland J, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA. Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care program: what are the difficulties? Dig Surg. 2007;24(6):441–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmed J, Khan S, Gatt M, Kallam R, MacFie J. Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010;97(5):754–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Feroci F, Lenzi E, Baraghini M, et al. Fast-track colorectal surgery: protocol adherence influences postoperative outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(1):103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. ERAS Interactive Audit System. http://www2.erassociety.org/index.php/login-gateway. Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Lee M.D., M.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, L. (2015). Department-Wide Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway. In: Feldman, L., Delaney, C., Ljungqvist, O., Carli, F. (eds) The SAGES / ERAS® Society Manual of Enhanced Recovery Programs for Gastrointestinal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20364-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20364-5_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20363-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20364-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics