Abstract
While numerous claims are made about the effectiveness of games, the studies that examine their educational effectiveness often contain flaws resulting in unclear conclusions. One possible solution for these shortcomings is to focus on separate game elements rather than on games as a whole. A second solution is to take into account students’ perception as this is likely to affect students’ interpretations and learning outcomes. This study investigated the effect of the integration of an educational game in the curriculum on students’ motivation, perception, and learning outcomes. Forty-nine vocational track students participated, all working in a game-based learning environment for learning calculations with fractions. The results demonstrate that integrating the learning content in the game with the learning content in the classroom is related to students’ in-game performance, but not to students’ math performance on a paper-and-pencil test, postgame perception and postgame motivation. To conclude this chapter, practical and theoretical implications for the fields of instructional design and educational games research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
PGS [Project Algemene Vakken; PAV] breaks through subject-tied learning, and is based on an integrated approach. The students develop knowledge, skills, and attitudes in useful and recognizable contexts, making them more sufficiently resilient and socially skilled.
- 2.
For a thorough description of the environment, see Vandercruysse, Maertens, and Elen (2015).
- 3.
A demo-version can be found on http://www.monkeytalesgames.com/UKen/games/2 (LarianStudios).
References
Akilli, G. K. (2007). Games and simulations: A new approach in education? In D. G. Gibson, C. A. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing: The comprehensive guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Barendregt, W., & Bekker, T. M. (2011). The influence of the level of free-choice learning activities on the use of an educational computer game. Computers & Education, 56, 80–90. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.018.
Barzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2014). Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers & Education, 70, 65–79. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.003.
Becker, K. (2007). Pedagogy in commercial video games. In D. G. Gibson, C. A. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-304-3.ch002.
Bergeron, B. (2006). Developing serious games. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media.
Charsky, D., & Mims, C. (2008). Integrating commercial off-the-shelf video games into school curriculums. TechTrends, 52, 38–44.
Clark, D. B., Nelson, B. C., Chang, H.-Y., Martinez-Garza, M., Slack, K., & D’Angelo, C. M. (2011). Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptually-integrated digital game: Comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the United States. Computers & Education, 57, 2178–2195. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.007.
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). Cognitive consequences of making computer-based learning activities more game-like. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27, 2011–2016. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.008.
Demirbilek, M., & Tamer, S. L. (2010). Math teachers’ perspectives on using educational computer games in math education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 709–716. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.222.
Din, F. S., & Calao, J. (2001). The effects of playing educational video games on kindergarten achievement. Child Study Journal, 31, 95–102.
Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201–204.
Felicia, P. (2011). How can digital games be used to teach the school curriculum? Retrieved from http://linked.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=22779&folderId=24664&name=DLFE-783.pdf
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441–467. doi:10.1177/1046878102238607.
Girard, C., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2013). Serious games as new educational tools. How effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 207–219. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00489.x.
Grabinger, R. S. (2009). Discussion. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 836–840.
Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 169–206. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.508029.
Hayes, E., & Games, I. (2008). Learning through game design: a review of current software and research. Games and Culture, 3, 309–332.
Hays, R. T. (2005). The effectiveness of instructional games: A literature review and discussion (Report No. 2005-004). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.
Herndon, J. N. (1987). Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 10, 11–14.
Ke, F. (2008a). Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 429–445. doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2.
Ke, F. (2008b). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: Cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 539–556. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9086-5.
Ke, F., & Grabowksi, B. (2007). Gameplaying for maths learning: Cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 249–259. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00593.x.
Kebritchi, M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational computer games: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 256–270. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00921.x.
Kinzie, M. B. (1990). Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 5–21.
Koh, E., Kin, Y. G., Wadhwa, B., & Lim, J. (2012). Teacher perceptions of games in Singapore schools. Simulation & Gaming, 43, 51–66. doi:10.1177/1046878111401839.
Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55, 630–643. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023.
Lowyck, J., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2004). Instructional conceptions: Analyses from an instructional design perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 429–444.
Malone, T. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the 1st SIGPC symposium on small systems, Palo Alto, CA (pp. 162–169).
McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1987). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48–58. doi:10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 455–474. doi:10.1080/09585170500384529.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.
Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally controlling styles. Journal of Personality, 53, 435–449. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00375.x.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzle, C. D., & Whitehead, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 261–276.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658.
Shuell, T. J., & Farber, S. L. (2001). Students’ perceptions of technology use in college courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 119–138.
Sitzman, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64, 489–528.
Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., Dai, D. Y., & Wind, A. P. (2011). Review of research on computer games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 127–221). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Vandercruysse, S., Maertens, M., & Elen, J. (2015). Description of the educational math game “Monkey Tales: The museum of anything”. New York, NY: Springer
Vandercruysse, S., Vandewaetere, M., Cornillie, F., & Clarebout, G. (2013). Competition and students’ perceptions in a game-based language learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(6), 927–950.
Vandercruysse, S., Vandewaetere, M., Maertens, M., ter Vrugte, J., Wouters, P., de Jong, T., … Elen, J. (2015). Development and validation of the game perception scale (GPS). Journal of Educational Media and Hypermedia, 24(1), 43–74.
Vandercruysse, S., Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2012). Game based learning: A review on the effectiveness of educational games. In M. M. Cruz-Cunda (Ed.), Handbook of research on serious games as educational, business, and research tools. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer games and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 229–243. doi:10.2190/FLHV-K4WA-WPVQ-H0YM.
Walker, D. F., & Soltis, J. F. (1997). Curriculum and aims. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Watson, W. R., Mong, C. J., & Harris, C. A. (2011). A case study of the in-class use of a video game for teaching high school history. Computers & Education, 56, 466–474.
Winne, P. H. (1982). Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects. Instructional Science, 11, 13–28.
Winne, P. H. (1987). Why process-product research cannot explain process-product findings and a proposed remedy: The cognitive mediational paradigm. Teaching & Teacher Education, 3, 333–356.
Wouters, P., van der Spek, D., & van Oostendorp, H. (2009). Current practices in serious game research: A review from a learning outcomes perspective. In T. M. Connolly, M. Stansfield, & L. Boyle (Eds.), Games based learning advancements for multisensory human computer interfaces: Techniques and effective practices (pp. 232–255). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-360-9.ch014.
Acknowledgments
This work was sponsored by a research project funded by iMinds Flanders (ICON, Games@School (G@S), 2012–2013) and a research project funded by the Fund of Scientific Research (FWO—G.O.516.11.N.10). Additionally, the authors would like to express their great appreciation to Martin Vanbrabant, for the technical support concerning the customization options of the game-based learning environment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vandercruysse, S., Desmet, E., Vandewaetere, M., Elen, J. (2015). Integration in the Curriculum as a Factor in Math-Game Effectiveness. In: Torbeyns, J., Lehtinen, E., Elen, J. (eds) Describing and Studying Domain-Specific Serious Games. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20276-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20276-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20275-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20276-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)