Advertisement

Applying Motivation Theory to the Design of Game-Based Learning Environments

  • Jon R. StarEmail author
  • Jason Chen
  • Chris Dede
Part of the Advances in Game-Based Learning book series (AGBL)

Abstract

Although there has been a wealth of research exploring motivation within game-based learning environments, few of these studies employ frameworks that are grounded in well-established theories of motivation. This chapter brings a rigorous theoretical framework for motivation to the study and design of a game-based learning environment. First, we outline a key motivation construct that has potential value for the design of game-based learning environments—Eccles and Wigfield’s expectancy-value theory. We then provide a description of a game whose design was informed by this motivational theory, where the game was intended to promote students’ interest in and motivation to pursue science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers.

Keywords

Expectancy-value theory Motivation Game-based learning environment STEM 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Parts of this chapter appeared in: Tran, C., Chen, J., Warschauer, M., Conley, A., and Dede, C. (2012). Applying motivation theories to the design of educational technology. In C. Martin, A. Ochsner, and K. Squire (Eds.), Proceedings of the Games, Learning, and Society Conference: Vol. 2 (pp. 291–297). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.

The research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DRL #0929575) to Chris Dede and Jon R. Star. The ideas in this chapter are those of the authors and do not represent official positions of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(2), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 271–285.Google Scholar
  5. Bruckman, A. (1999). Can educational be fun? Paper presented at the Game Developers Conference ’99, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eccles, J. S. (1993). School and family effects on the ontogeny of children’s interests, self-perceptions, and activity choice. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1992: Developmental perspectives on motivation (pp. 145–208). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eccles (Parsons), J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  9. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Flanagan, C., Miller, C., Reuman, D., & Yee, D. (1989). Self-concepts, domain values, and self-esteem: Relations and changes at early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 57, 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gwilliam, L. R., & Betz, N. E. (2001). Validity of measures of math- and science-related self-efficacy for African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Habgood, M. P. J., Ainsworth, S., & Benford, S. (2005). Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games. Simulation and Gaming, 36(4), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harackiewicz, J., Barron, K., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A., & Thrash, T. (2002). Revision of goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hogle, J. G. (1996). Considering games as cognitive tools: In search of effective “edutainment”. Retrieved from http://www.twinpinefarm.com/pdfs/games.pdf.
  18. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kerawalla, L., & Crook, C. (2005). From promises to practices: The fate of educational software in the home. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(1), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lau, S., & Roeser, R. W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students’ situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 8, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moos, D. C., & Marroquin, E. (2010). Multimedia, hypermedia, and hypertext: Motivation considered and reconsidered. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.The College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations