Advertisement

Description of the Educational Math Game “Monkey Tales: The Museum of Anything”

  • Sylke VandercruysseEmail author
  • Marie Maertens
  • Jan Elen
Part of the Advances in Game-Based Learning book series (AGBL)

Abstract

In this contribution, we present the game-based learning environment Monkey Tales in which pupils and students can practice mathematics. The learning content and goals, as well as the story line and game design are discussed. The environment can be used for several research purposes, such as studies which focus on the effects of the use of educational games in the classroom (e.g., effect on performance, motivation) as well as studies which focus on learners’ behavior in the game and their mathematical performances during game play.

Keywords

Mathematics Math game Game design Educational game 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The environment described in this manuscript is used for studies based on a research project funded by iMinds Flanders (ICON, Games@School (G@S), 2012–2013) and on a research project funded by the Fund of Scientific Research (FWO—G.O.516.11.N.10). Additionally, the authors would like to express their great appreciation to Martin Vanbrabant, for the technical support concerning the customization options.

References

  1. Akilli, G. K. (2007). Games and simulations: A new approach in education? In D. G. Gibson, C. A. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing: The comprehensive guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  3. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning. Methods and development (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Bergeron, B. (2006). Developing serious games. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media.Google Scholar
  5. Burkolter, D., Kluge, A., Sauer, J., & Ritzmann, S. (2010). Comparative study of three training methods for enhancing process control performance: Emphasis shift training, situation awareness training, and drill and practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 976–986. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charsky, D. (2010). From edutainment to serious games: A change in the use of game characteristics. Games and Culture, 5, 177–198. doi: 10.1177/1555412009354727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng, H. N. H., Wu, W. M. C., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T.-W. (2009). Equal opportunities tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms. Computers & Education, 53, 866–876. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ebner, M., & Holzinger, A. (2005). Successful implementation of user-centered game-based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering. Computers & Education, 49, 873–890. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, J. E. (1976). Competition and gaming. An experimental study. Simulation & Games, 7, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franken, R. E., & Brown, D. J. (1995). Why do people like competition? The motivation for winning, putting forth effort, improving one’s performance, performing well, being instrumental, and expressing forceful/aggressive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 175–184. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00035-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441–467. doi: 10.1177/1046878102238607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Habgood, M. P. J., Ainsworth, S., & Benford, S. (2005). Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games. Simulation & Gaming, 36, 483–498. doi: 10.1177/1046878105282276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hays, R. T. (2005). The effectiveness of instructional games: A literature review and discussion (Report No. 2005-004). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.Google Scholar
  14. Maertens, M., Vandewaetere, M., Cornillie, F., & Desmet, P. (2014). From pen-and-paper content to educational math game content for children: A transfer with added difficulty. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2, 85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malone, T. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the first SIGPC Symposium (pp. 162–169). Palo Alto, CA: ACM.Google Scholar
  16. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivation for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (Conative and affective process analysis, Vol. 3, pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 455–474. doi: 10.1080/09585170500384529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Rollings, A., & Adams, E. (2003). On game design. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar
  20. Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Sun, H. F. (2006). Competitive motives and strategies: Understanding constructive competition. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 87–99. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.10.2.87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vandewaetere, M., Cornillie, F., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2013). Adaptivity in educational games: Including player and gameplay characteristics. International Journal of Higher Education, 2, 106–114. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer games and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 229–243. doi: 10.2190/FLHV-K4WA-WPVQ-H0YM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wauters, K., Desmet, P., & Van Den Noortgate, W. (2010). Adaptive item-based learning environments based on the item response theory: Possibilities and challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 549–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J. L., … Conkey, C. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes. Review and research proposals. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 217–266. doi: 10.1177/1046878108321866
  25. Worm, B. S., & Buch, S. V. (2014). Does competition work as a motivating factor in e-learning? A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 9(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu, F.-Y. (2003). The mediating effects of anonymity and proximity in an online synchronized competitive learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(2), 153–167. doi: 10.2190/59CX-3M7L-KKB4-UYDD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Instructional Psychology and Technology, KU LeuvenKortrijkBelgium
  2. 2.ITEC—iMinds—KU Leuven—Kulak, Interactive Technologies, KU Leuven KulakKortrijkBelgium
  3. 3.Center for Instructional Psychology and Technology, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations