The Role of Curiosity-Triggering Events in Game-Based Learning for Mathematics
In this study, we investigate whether cognitive conflicts induced by curiosity-triggering events have a positive impact on learning and motivation. In two experiments, we tested a game about proportional reasoning for secondary prevocational students. Experiment 1 used a curiosity-triggering vs. control condition pretest–posttest design. The control condition received the game without curiosity-triggering events. The results provided evidence that the game improves proportional reasoning skills. Although game performance was positively related to posttest performance, the hypothesized higher increase in learning and motivation after curiosity-triggering events was not found. Based on the results of Experiment 1, the game was adapted. Experiment 2 showed basically the same pattern of results, but we did not find a learning effect after playing the game. In the Discussion, we suggest additional research with think-aloud and/or eye-tracking to map the actual thoughts after the curiosity-triggering events. In addition, we propose some alternative implementations to evoke cognitive conflicts.
KeywordsCuriosity Game-based learning Cognition Motivation Mathematics
This research is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (project Number No. 411-00-003).
- Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: WH Freeman.Google Scholar
- Cameron, B., & Dwyer, F. (2005). The effect of online gaming, cognition and feedback type in facilitating delayed achievement of different learning objectives. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16, 243–258.Google Scholar
- Leemkuil, H., & de Jong, T. (2011). Instructional support in games. In S. Tobias & D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 353–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. E. (2011). Multimedia learning and games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 281–305). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
- Rick, J., Bejan, A., Roche, C., & Weinberger, A. (2012). Proportion: Learning proportional reasoning together. In A. Ravenscroft, S. Lindstaedt, C. D. Kloos, D. Hernández-Leo (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 7563. 21st century learning for 21st century skills (pp. 513–518). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 347–363.Google Scholar
- Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., Dai, D. Y., & Wind, A. P. (2011). Review of research on computer games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 127–222). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
- Vandercruysse, S., terVrugte, J., de Jong, T., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (2015). “Zeldenrust”: A mathematical game-based learning environment for vocational students.Google Scholar