Advertisement

Number Navigation Game (NNG): Experience and Motivational Effects

  • Gabriela Rodríguez-AflechtEmail author
  • Boglárka Brezovszky
  • Nonmanut Pongsakdi
  • Tomi Jaakkola
  • Minna M. Hannula-Sormunen
  • Jake McMullen
  • Erno Lehtinen
Part of the Advances in Game-Based Learning book series (AGBL)

Abstract

Number Navigation Game-based learning environment (NNG) is a mathematical game-based learning environment designed to enhance students’ adaptivity with arithmetic problem solving and to increase their motivation towards math. Fourth through sixth grade classrooms were randomly assigned into either an experimental group (students n = 642) which played NNG during a 10-week period or into a control group (students n = 526) which continued with a traditional textbook-based mathematics curriculum. The aims of the present study were to investigate the effects of the intervention on students’ motivation and to explore how students’ differing game experiences were related to changes in their motivation and, as an indicator of cognitive outcomes, their arithmetic fluency. Results indicate the intervention resulted in small decreases in the math motivation expectancy-values of interest, utility, and attainment value. Students had mixed game experiences which varied by gender and grade level. When looking at the role of these game experiences on post-test motivation and arithmetic fluency, corresponding pre-test values were the strongest predictive variables. Out of game experiences, only competence was a significant predictor of post-test motivational scores; however, no game experience variable was a predictor of post-test arithmetic fluency.

Keywords

Game-based learning GEQ Motivation Expectancy-value model Arithmetic fluency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Gabriela Rodríguez-Aflecht, Centre for Learning Research, Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku; Boglárka Brezovszky, Centre for Learning Research, Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Finland; Finland; Nonmanut Pongsakdi, Centre for Learning Research, Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku; Tomi Jaakkola, Centre for Learning Research, Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku; Minna M. Hannula-Sormunen Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Finland and Turku Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Turku, Finland; Jake McMullen, Centre for Learning Research, Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Finland; Erno Lehtinen, Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Finland.

The present study was funded by grant 274163 awarded to the last author by the Academy of Finland.

References

  1. Abt, C. (1987). Serious games. Boston, MA: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  2. Baroody, A. J., Bajwa, N. P., & Eiland, M. (2009). Why can’t Johnny remember the basic facts? Developmental Disabilities, 15, 69–79. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.45.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, J., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21, 416–428. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., & Schellens, T. (2010). Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Computers & Education, 54, 1145–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brezovszky, B., Rodríguez-Aflecht, G., McMullen, J., Veermans, K., Pongsakdi, N., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M. & Lehtinen, E. (2015). Developing adaptive number knowledge with the Number Navigation game-based learning environment. In J. Torbeyns, E. Lehtinen & J. Elen (Eds.), Developing competencies in learners: From ascertaining to intervening (pp. xx–xx). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Canobi, K. H. (2009). Concept–procedure interactions in children’s addition and subtraction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 131–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, D. (2005). Contexts, gaming pleasures, and gendered preferences. Simulation & Gaming, 36, 464–482. doi: 10.1177/1046878105282160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of the empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59, 661–686. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  11. De Brabander, C., & Martens, R. L. (2014). Towards a unified theory of task-specific motivation. Educational Research Review, 11, 27–44. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Grove, F., Van Looy, J., Neys, J., & Jansz, J. (2012). Playing in school or at home? An exploration of the effects of context on educational game experience. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10, 83–208. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ985422.pdf.Google Scholar
  13. De Grove, F., Van Looy, J., & Courtois, C. (2010). Towards a serious game experience model: Validation, extension and adaptation of the GEQ for use in an educational context. In L. Calvi, K. Nuijten, & H. Bouwknegt (Eds.), Playability and player experience (Vol. 10, pp. 47–61). Breda, The Netherlands: Breda University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
  14. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. Retrieved from http://www.rcgd.isr.umich.edu/garp/articles/eccles02c.
  15. Ermi, L., & Mäyrä, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In S. de Castell & J. Jenson (Eds.), Changing views: Worlds in play: Selected papers of the 2005 digital games research Association’s second international conference (pp. 15–27). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Digital Interactive Games Research Association.Google Scholar
  16. Gajadhar, B., Nap, H., De Kort, Y., & IJsselsteijn, W. (2008). Shared fun is doubled fun: Player enjoyment as a function of social setting. In P. Markopoulos, B. Ruyter, W. IJsselsteijn, & D. Rowland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fun and Games (pp. 106–117). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 169–206. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2010.508029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Poels, K., Jurgelionis, A., & Bellotti, F. (2007). Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. Proceedings from the 2007 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Workshop ‘Methods for Evaluating Games—How to measure Usability and User Experience in Games’. ACM Digital Library. Retrieved from http://alexandria.tue.nl/openaccess/Metis215134
  19. Islas Sedano, C., Leendertz, V., Vinni, M., Sutinen, E., & Ellis, S. (2013). Hypercontextualized learning games: Fantasy, motivation, and engagement in reality. Simulation & Gaming, 44, 821–845. doi: 10.1177/1046878113514807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Järvelä, S., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2000). Socio-emotional orientation as a mediating variable in teaching learning interaction: Implications for instructional design. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 293–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713696677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenkins, H. (2011). Foreword. In S. de Freitas & P. Maharg (Eds.), Digital games and learning (pp. xxiii–xxvi). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 641–661. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004.Google Scholar
  23. Jenson, J., & de Castell, S. (2010). Gender, simulation, and gaming: Research review and redirections. Simulation & Gaming, 41(1), 51–71. doi: 10.1177/1046878109353473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiili, K., Lainema, T., De Freitas, S., & Arnab, S. (2014). Flow framework for analyzing the quality of educational games. Entertainment Computing, 5, 367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2014.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klemetti, M., Taimisto, O., & Karppinen, P. (2009). The attitudes of Finnish school teachers towards commercial educational games. In M. Kankaanranta & P. Neittaanmäki (Eds.), Design and use of serious games (pp. 97–106). Jyväskylä, Finland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lehtinen, E., Brezovszky, B., Rodríguez-Aflecht, G., Lehtinen, H., Hannula-Sormunen, M., M., McMullen, J., … Jaakkola, T. (2015). Number Navigation Game (NNG): Design principles and game description. In J. Torbeyns, E. Lehtinen & J. Elen (Eds.), Developing competencies in learners: From ascertaining to intervening (pp. xx–xx). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Lepper, M. R., & Malone, T. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (Cognitive and affective process analysis, Vol. 3, pp. 255–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Lowyck, J., Lehtinen, E., & Elen, J. (2004). Editorial: Students’ perspectives on learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 401–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lucas, K., & Sherry, J. L. (2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication-based explanation. Communication Research, 31, 499–523. doi: 10.1177/0093650204267930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMullen, J., Brezovszky, B., Rodríguez-Aflecht, G., Pongsakdi, N. & Lehtinen, E. (2015). Adaptive Number Knowledge: Exploring the foundations of adaptivity with whole-number arithmetic. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  31. Nacke, L. E., & Drachen, A. (2011). Towards a framework of player experience research. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Evaluating Player Experience in Games at FDG (Vol. 11). Retrieved from http://hciweb.usask.ca/uploads/230-NackeDrachenPXFramework
  32. Nacke, L. E., & Lindley, C. A. (2009). Affective ludology, flow and immersion in a first-person shooter: Measurement of player experience. Loading, 3. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/72/71.
  33. Nacke, L. E., Stellmach, S., & Lindley, C. A. (2011). Electroencephalographic assessment of player experience: A pilot study in affective ludology. Simulation & Gaming, 42, 632–655. doi: 10.1177/1046878110378140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oksanen, K. (2013). Subjective experience and sociability in a collaborative serious game. Simulation & Gaming, 44, 767–793. doi: 10.1177/1046878113513079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paras, B., & Bizzocchi, J. (2005). Game, motivation, and effective learning: An integrated model for educational game design. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views: Worlds in Play. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/06276.18065.pdf
  36. Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Bedwell, W., Lazzara, E. L., & Salas, E. (2010). Game-based learning: The impact of flow state and videogame self-efficacy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54, 2398–2402. doi: 10.1177/154193121005402808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poels, K., de Kort, Y. A. W., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2007). It is always a lot of fun!—Exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In B. Kapralos, M. Katchabaw, & J. Rajnovich (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play (pp. 83–89). ACM Press. Retrieved from http://alexandria.tue.nl/openaccess/Metis215146
  38. Poels, K., IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., & Van Iersel, B. (2010). Digital games, the aftermath. Qualitative insights into post game experiences. In R. Bernhaupt (Ed.), Evaluating user experiences in games. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wegge, J. (2001). Motivation, information processing, and performance: Effects of goal setting on basic cognitive processes. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 269–296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47676-2.Google Scholar
  41. Whitton, N. (2010a). Game engagement theory and adult learning. Simulation & Gaming, 42, 597–610. doi: 10.1177/1046878110378587.Google Scholar
  42. Whitton, N. (2010b). Learning with digital games: A practical guide to engaging students in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In T. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. The next decade of research in motivation and achievement (pp. 35–70). London, England: Emerald.Google Scholar
  45. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2002).The Development of Competence Beliefs, Expectancies for Success, and Achievement Values from Childhood through Adolescence. In A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). Academic. Retrieved from http://www.rcgd.isr.umich.edu/garp/articles/eccles02o
  47. Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
  48. Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 249–265. doi: 10.1037/a0031311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Rodríguez-Aflecht
    • 1
    Email author
  • Boglárka Brezovszky
    • 1
  • Nonmanut Pongsakdi
    • 1
  • Tomi Jaakkola
    • 1
  • Minna M. Hannula-Sormunen
    • 1
  • Jake McMullen
    • 1
  • Erno Lehtinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Teacher EducationCentre for Learning Research, University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations