Advertisement

Extending the Retail Brand to Non-traditional Products

  • Elisa MartinelliEmail author
  • Francesca de Canio
  • Gianluca Marchi
  • Marina Vignola
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This study focuses on retail brand extension from the consumer perspective when non-traditional products—in this case over-the-counter pharmaceuticals—are offered with the private label brand. A model in which attitude towards the extension (ATE) mediates the impact of some antecedents—national brand preference (NBP), trust towards the retailer (T), fit (FIT), private label knowledge (PLK) and consumer innovativeness (INN)—impacting the intention to purchase the extended PL brand (INTB) is proposed and tested. Direct effects regarding NBP and FIT are tested too. 500 questionnaires were collected from a sample of retail customers. Structural equation modeling serves to test the hypotheses. The model shows a good fit and the hypotheses are supported—except for INN.

Keywords

Brand extension Retail brands Attitude Intention to buy 

References

  1. Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ailawadi, K., & Keller, K. L. (2004). Understanding retail branding: Conceptual insights and research priorities. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(March), 411–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexander, N., & Colgate, M. (2005). Customers’ responses to retail brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(3), 393–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellizzi, J. A., Krueckeberg, H. F., Hamilton, J. R., & Martin, W. A. (1981). Consumer perceptions of national, private, and generic brands. Journal of Retailing, 57(4), 56–70.Google Scholar
  7. Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (2001). The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 53(3), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boush, D. M., & Loken, B. (1991). A process tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(February), 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter, R. E., & Curry, D. J. (2013). Perceptions versus performance when managing extensions: new evidence about the role of fit between a parent brand and an extension. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 61, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colgate, M., & Alexander, N. (2002). Retailers and diversification: The financial service dimension. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dick, A. S., Jain, A. K., & Richardson, P. (1995). Correlates of store brand proneness: Some empirical observations. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4(4), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(August), 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dwivedi, A., & Merrilees, B. (2013). Retail brand extensions: Unpacking the link between brand extension attitude and change in parent brand equity. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hem, L. E., de Chernatony, L., & Iversen, N. M. (2003). Factors influencing successful brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(7/8), 781–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hem, L. E., Iversen, N. M., & Olsen, L. E. (2014). Category characteristics’ effects on brand extension attitudes: A research note. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1589–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keller, K. L. (2008). Strategic brand management. Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Klink, R. R., & Smith, D. C. (2001). Threats to the external validity of brand extension research. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laforet, S. (2008). Retail brand extension—perceived fit, risks and trust. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milberg, S. J., Goodstein, R. C., Sinn, F., Cuneo, A., & Epstein, L. D. (2013). Call back the jury: Reinvestigating the effects of fit and parent brand quality in determining brand extension success. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(3/4), 374–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell, V., & Chaudhury, A. (2014). Predicting retail brand extension strategy success: A consumer based model. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 13(2), 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product-level similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reast, J. D. (2005). Brand trust and brand extension acceptance: The relationship. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(1), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor, V. A., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). Ad spending on brand extensions: Does similarity matter? The Journal of Brand Management, 11(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of brand extension success. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ward, J. C., Bitner, M. J., & Barnes, J. (1992). Measuring the prototypicality and meaning of retail environments. Journal of Retailing, 68(2), 194–220.Google Scholar
  28. Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25(Autumn), 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisa Martinelli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesca de Canio
    • 2
  • Gianluca Marchi
    • 1
  • Marina Vignola
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics Marco BiagiUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations