Skip to main content

Extending the Retail Brand to Non-traditional Products

  • Conference paper
Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing

Abstract

This study focuses on retail brand extension from the consumer perspective when non-traditional products—in this case over-the-counter pharmaceuticals—are offered with the private label brand. A model in which attitude towards the extension (ATE) mediates the impact of some antecedents—national brand preference (NBP), trust towards the retailer (T), fit (FIT), private label knowledge (PLK) and consumer innovativeness (INN)—impacting the intention to purchase the extended PL brand (INTB) is proposed and tested. Direct effects regarding NBP and FIT are tested too. 500 questionnaires were collected from a sample of retail customers. Structural equation modeling serves to test the hypotheses. The model shows a good fit and the hypotheses are supported—except for INN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ailawadi, K., & Keller, K. L. (2004). Understanding retail branding: Conceptual insights and research priorities. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(March), 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, N., & Colgate, M. (2005). Customers’ responses to retail brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(3), 393–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellizzi, J. A., Krueckeberg, H. F., Hamilton, J. R., & Martin, W. A. (1981). Consumer perceptions of national, private, and generic brands. Journal of Retailing, 57(4), 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (2001). The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 53(3), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boush, D. M., & Loken, B. (1991). A process tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(February), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. E., & Curry, D. J. (2013). Perceptions versus performance when managing extensions: new evidence about the role of fit between a parent brand and an extension. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 61, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colgate, M., & Alexander, N. (2002). Retailers and diversification: The financial service dimension. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. S., Jain, A. K., & Richardson, P. (1995). Correlates of store brand proneness: Some empirical observations. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4(4), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(August), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, A., & Merrilees, B. (2013). Retail brand extensions: Unpacking the link between brand extension attitude and change in parent brand equity. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hem, L. E., de Chernatony, L., & Iversen, N. M. (2003). Factors influencing successful brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(7/8), 781–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hem, L. E., Iversen, N. M., & Olsen, L. E. (2014). Category characteristics’ effects on brand extension attitudes: A research note. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1589–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2008). Strategic brand management. Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R., & Smith, D. C. (2001). Threats to the external validity of brand extension research. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 326–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laforet, S. (2008). Retail brand extension—perceived fit, risks and trust. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milberg, S. J., Goodstein, R. C., Sinn, F., Cuneo, A., & Epstein, L. D. (2013). Call back the jury: Reinvestigating the effects of fit and parent brand quality in determining brand extension success. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(3/4), 374–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, V., & Chaudhury, A. (2014). Predicting retail brand extension strategy success: A consumer based model. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 13(2), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product-level similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reast, J. D. (2005). Brand trust and brand extension acceptance: The relationship. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(1), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V. A., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). Ad spending on brand extensions: Does similarity matter? The Journal of Brand Management, 11(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of brand extension success. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. C., Bitner, M. J., & Barnes, J. (1992). Measuring the prototypicality and meaning of retail environments. Journal of Retailing, 68(2), 194–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25(Autumn), 41–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Martinelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martinelli, E., de Canio, F., Marchi, G., Vignola, M. (2015). Extending the Retail Brand to Non-traditional Products. In: Martínez-López, F., Gázquez-Abad, J., Sethuraman, R. (eds) Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20182-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics