Skip to main content

Private Labels and National Brands: A Comparison Within Brand Extension

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

This paper focuses on private labels and manufacturers’ brands; its specific goal is to answer the question whether they are the same in terms of their brand extension effectiveness. The paper reports the results of three experimental studies which analyze the impact of category fit and brand knowledge on brand extension of private label vs. national brands. The results seem to support the view that private labels differ from national brands; contrary to what stated by the branding literature both category fit and brand knowledge, have no significant effect on their extension evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ailawadi, K. L., & Keller, K. L. (2004). Understanding retail branding: Conceptual insights and research priorities. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, N., & Colgate, M. (2005). Customers’ responses to retail brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(3/4), 393–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boush, D. M., & Loken, B. (1991). A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buil, I., de Chernatony, L., & Hem, L. E. (2009). Brand extension strategies: Perceived fit, brand type, and culture influences. European Journal of Marketing, 43(11/12), 1300–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, S. (2000). The strategic role of retail brands in british grocery retailing. European Journal of Marketing, 34(8), 875–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czellar, S. (2003). Consumer attitude toward brand extensions: An integrative model and research propositions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(1), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Goedertier, F., & Van Ossel, G. (2005). Consumer perceptions of store brands versus national brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(4), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. S., Jain, A. K., & Richardson, P. (1996). How consumers evaluate store brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5(2), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gierl, H., & Huettl, V. (2011). A closer look at similarity: The effects of perceived similarity and conjunctive cues on brand extension evaluation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime, I., Diamantopoulos, A., & Smith, G. (2002). Consumer evaluation of extensions and their effects on the core brand. Key issue and research propositions. European Journal of Marketing, 36(11/12), 1415–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K., Singh, V., & Chintagunta, P. (2006). Understanding store-brand purchase behavior across categories. Marketing Science, 25(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(February), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyvis, T., & Janiszewski, C. (2004). When are broader brands stronger brands? An accessibility perspective on the success of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monga, A. B., & John, D. R. (2010). What makes brands elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing, 74(3), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangaswamy, A., Burke, R. R., & Oliva, T. A. (1993). Brand equity and the extendibility of brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. C., & Andrews, J. (1995). Rethinking the effects of perceived fit on customers’ evaluations of new products. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sood, S., & Drèze, X. (2006). Brand extensions of experiential goods: Movie sequel evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of brand extension success. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Grosso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grosso, M., Castaldo, S. (2015). Private Labels and National Brands: A Comparison Within Brand Extension. In: Martínez-López, F., Gázquez-Abad, J., Sethuraman, R. (eds) Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20182-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics