Skip to main content

Object-Based Final-Year Project: Designing and Manufacturing a Quick Stop Device

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology ((MFMT))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on teaching and learning of a final-year project in undergraduate mechanical engineering degree in the field of manufacturing. The final-year project allows students to apply the knowledge they learned through undergraduate course work. In addition, it provides the opportunity to get practical involvement in design, project management, manufacturing, creativity, practical applications, etc. However, most final-year projects, nowadays, are either a portion of a big project or performing tests to understand the trends of certain parameters. As a result, such projects only allow the opportunity for partial knowledge to the students. Thus, an object-based project in the final year has been explored in this chapter. A quick stop device (QSD), which is used to investigate chip formation mechanism during machining, was proposed as an object to design, manufacture, and apply in the current investigation. It was found that this project allow students the opportunity of applying their course work knowledge in project works, taking complete responsibility, being innovative, free thinking, being creative, learning new things, and performing research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pramanik A, Islam M (2014a) Introduction of a new software package in teaching design methodology for material selection. Int J Inf Educ Technol 4(4)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pramanik AI (2013) Technology tools and approaches to improve undergraduate education. Int J Res Educ Methodol 4(1):390–400

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carter CS, Brickhouse NW (1989) What makes chemistry difficult? Alternate perceptions. J Chem Educ 66(3):223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seymour E (1995) Revisiting the “problem iceberg”: science, mathematics, and engineering students still chilled out. J College Sci Teach 24:392

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tobias S (1992) Revitalizing undergraduate science: why some things work and most don’t. An occasional paper on neglected problems in science education. ERIC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony SMH, Spencer B, Gutwill J, Kegley S, Molinaro M (1998) The ChemLinks and ModularCHEM consortia: using active and context-based learning to teach students how chemistry is actually done. J Chem Educ 75(3):322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pramanik A, Islam MN (2014b) Module-based teaching of mechanical design. Using technology tools to innovate assessment, reporting, and teaching practices in engineering education, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mills JE, Treagust DF (2003) Engineering education—is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Austral J Eng Educ 3(2)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones BF, Rasmussen CM, Moffitt MC (1997) Real-life problem solving: a collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas JW (1999) Project based learning: a handbook for middle and high school teachers. Buck Institute for Education, Novato

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dym CL et al (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. J Eng Educ 94(1):103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas JW (2000) A review of research on project-based learning

    Google Scholar 

  13. Griffiths B (1986) The development of a quick-stop device for use in metal cutting hole manufacturing processes. Int J Mach Tool Des Res 26(2):191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chern G-L (2005) Development of a new and simple quick-stop device for the study on chip formation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(7):789–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Black J, James C (1981) The hammer QSD-quick stop device for high speed machining and rubbing. J Manuf Sci Eng 103(1):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ozturk S, Altan E (2012) Design of a computer aided quick-stop device for study of dead metal zone formation. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 34(4):501–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Toenshoff HK, Denkena B (2013) Basics of cutting and abrasive processes. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Armarego E, Brown RF (1969) The machining of metals. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, p 437

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pramanik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pramanik, A., Sanghvi, H., Basak, A.K. (2015). Object-Based Final-Year Project: Designing and Manufacturing a Quick Stop Device. In: Davim, J.P. (eds) Modern Manufacturing Engineering. Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20152-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20152-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20151-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20152-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics