Skip to main content

Studies in Individuality: Can Students, Teachers and Schools Be Determined from Children’s Handwriting?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8915))

Abstract

The individuality of handwriting is the principal underpinning of forensic handwriting examination. Studies of individuality have considered different statistical extremes to obtain handwriting samples. The first is a representative population drawn from a country. The second is a population of twins– so as to reflect genetic similarity. A third approach is to study whether teachers and schools have an influence on individuality. This paper presents preliminary results of individuality studies with data from children’s handwriting, in grades 2–4, to identify the school, teacher and student. Considering the single handwritten word and we evaluate the performances of two methods, one based on feature values assigned by human questioned document examiners and the other based on automatically computing image features. Results are given for determining the school, the teacher and the student from images using restricted Boltzmann machines. Results of identifying the school with human assigned features and support vector machines are also given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hilton, O.: Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents, Revised Edition. CRC Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hinton, G.E., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786), 504–507 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Hinton, G.E.: Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Comput. 14(8), 1771–1800 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Huber, R.A., Headrick, A.M.: Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly, J.S., Lindblom, B.: Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y.: Classification using discriminative restricted Boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2008, pp. 536–543. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J.S., Henderson, D., Howard, R.E., Hubbard, W., Jackel, L.D.: Backpropagation applied to handwritten Zip Code recognition. Neural Comput. 1(4), 541–551 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Puri, M., Srihari, S.N., Hanson, L.: Probabilistic modeling of children’s handwriting. In: Document Recognition and Retrieval XX. SPIE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Osborn, A.: Questioned Documents. Nelson Hall Pub, Chicago (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rashid, S.F., Schambach, M.P., Rottland, J., von der Nüll, S.: Low resolution arabic recognition with multidimensional recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Multilingual OCR, MOCR 2013, pp. 6:1–6:5. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salakhutdinov, R., Mnih, A., Hinton, G.: Restricted Boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2007, pp. 791–798. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Srihari, S.N., Cha, S., Arora, H., Lee, S.: Individuality of handwriting. J. Forensic Sci. 44(4), 856–872 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Srihari, S.N., Huang, C., Srinivasan, H.: On the discriminability of the handwriting of twins. J. Forensic Sci. 53(2), 430–446 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, Z., Srihari, S.: Bayesian network structure learning using causality. In: Submitted (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The work was supported by Award No. 2010-DN-BX-K212 of the NIJ, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. DoJ. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the DoJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sargur N. Srihari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Srihari, S.N., Chen, G., Xu, Z., Hanson, L. (2015). Studies in Individuality: Can Students, Teachers and Schools Be Determined from Children’s Handwriting?. In: Garain, U., Shafait, F. (eds) Computational Forensics. IWCF IWCF 2012 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8915. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20125-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20125-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20124-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20125-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics