Abstract
Second Chance Schools (SCSs) were established in Greece as an effort to reintegrate into society adult school dropouts who have not completed their compulsory education. Scientific literacy is an integral part of the education of the SCSs’ students, and science teachers who work in SCSs face the challenge of developing science curricula according to the needs of their students. The present study aims to investigate Greek science teachers’ views on the meaning of the notion of students’ scientific literacy for the specific target population they refer to and further focuses on science teachers’ practices when developing a curriculum to achieve the goal of reintegrating their students in society through scientific literacy. For this purpose, eleven semi-structured interviews of science teachers (who are also designers of science curricula) were conducted. The analysis shows that science teachers who are inexperienced in adult education consider scientific literacy to be an introduction to the content of science, knowledge of which enables students to continue their studies in formal upper secondary education. On the other hand, experienced science teachers quite often recognize their students’ need to use science to explain situations they encounter in their daily life and claim that this is the reason they design context-based curricula. However, the contexts they design do not in any way incorporate socioscientific issues related to the specific social and cultural context of their students’ lives. Clearly, science teachers’ ability to design scientific literacy curricula which meet their students’ needs is not related only to the factor of teaching experience. Rather, it requires the science teachers’ enculturation into their students’ worlds and a paradigm shift in science teachers’ own ideology of science teaching.
This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund – ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) – Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aikenhead, G. (2002). Renegotiating the culture of school science: Scientific literacy for an informed public. Conference paper in Lisbon’s School of Science Conference. http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aikenhead/portugal.htm. Accessed 13 Dec 2014.
Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students ideas about science: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655–682.
Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379–394.
Bulte, A. (2007). How to connect concepts of science and technology when designing context-based science education, E – Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary symposium. http://nadidaktik.se/MSU/sem9/Linneproceedings.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2014.
Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2011). Does the discussion of socio‐scientific issues require a paradigm shift in science teachers’ thinking? International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1675–1702.
De Boer, D. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582–601.
Dos Santos, W. L. P. (2009). Scientific literacy: A Freirean perspective as a radical view of humanistic science education. Science Education, 93, 361–382.
Durant, J., Evans, G., & Thomas, G. (1993). Public understanding of science in Britain: The role of medicine in the popular representation of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 161–182.
Efstathiou, I. (2009). Enhancing students’ critical awareness in a Second Chance School in Greece: Reality or wishful thinking? Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 7, 382–405.
European Commission. (1995). White paper on education and training – Teaching and learning – Towards the learning society. Office for official publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/languages/documents/doc409_en.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2014.
Geddis, A. N. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75, 169–183.
Hewson, P. W., Tabachnick, B. R., Zeichner, K. M., Blomker, K. B., Meyer, H., Lembeger, J., Marion, R., Park, H., & Toolin, R. (1999). Educating prospective teachers of biology: Introduction and research methods. Science Education, 83, 247–273.
Hodson, D. (2002). Some thoughts on scientific literacy: Motives, meanings and curriculum implications. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 3, 1–20.
Huibregtse, I., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Wubbels, T. (1994). Physics teachers’ conceptions of learning, teaching and professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 539–561.
IDEKE. (2003). School guidelines for Second Chance Schools. Athens: IDEKE Publications.
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimensions of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291–310.
Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.
Layton, D., Davey, A., & Jenkins, E. (1986). Science for specific social purposes (SSSP): Perspectives on adult scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 13, 27–52.
Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B., & Zeidler, D. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 2079–2113.
Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1201–1224.
Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1499–1521.
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3, 173–184.
Pintó, R. (2005). Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers’ transformations and the design of related teacher education. Science Education, 89, 1–12.
Popli, R. (1999). Scientific literacy for all citizens: Different concepts and contents. Public Understanding of Science, 8, 123–137.
Ratcliffe, M. (2009). The place of socio-scientific issues in citizenship education. In A. Ross (Ed.), Human rights and citizenship education (pp. 12–16). London: CiCe.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Inc.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
Van Dijk, E. M. (2014). Understanding the heterogeneous nature of science: A comprehensive notion of PCK for scientific literacy. Science Education, 98, 397–411.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Dr. Levinson for his constructive comments on the papers’ original form.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kollas, S., Halkia, K. (2016). Second Chance Schools in Greece: A Critical Analysis of Science Teachers’ Views and Practices on Designing Scientific Literacy Curricula. In: Papadouris, N., Hadjigeorgiou, A., Constantinou, C. (eds) Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20073-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20074-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)