Abstract
Path diagrams are valuable visualization tools in practical structural equation modeling (SEM). They provide intuitively appealing representations of modeling ideas and results. As a part of the computational process of modeling, path diagrams can be viewed as input device or as output results. This paper discusses the latter role of path diagrams. The modeling scenario of interest is to produce path diagrams given the syntactic input of structural models. The process-flow, grouped-flow, and GRIP layout algorithms for producing path diagrams are described and discussed. Emphases are on building intuitions about these layout algorithms and hence the appropriate use of these algorithms for producing path diagrams for different types of models. Steps that automate the selection among these layout algorithms for a given model are proposed. Finally, adjustments that are needed for producing path diagrams with different styles and views are discussed. Path diagram examples are used throughout the paper to illustrate the layout algorithms, the proposed automatic selection steps, and different styles and views.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Chicago: IBM.
Battista, G. D., Eader, P., Tamassia, R., & Tollis, I. G. (1999). Graph drawing: Algorithms for the visualization of graphs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Boker, S. M., McArdle, J. J., & Neale, M. (2002). An algorithm for the hierarchical organization of path diagrams and calculation of components of expected covariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 174–194.
Epskamp, S. (2014). semPlot: Unified visualizations of structural equation models. Psychoco 2014, Tuebingen, Germany. http://www.sachaepskamp.com/files/semPlot.pdf
Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18.
Gajer, P., Goodrich, M. T., & Kobourov, S. G. (2004). A multi-dimensional approach to force-directed layouts of large graphs. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 29(1), 3–18.
Gajer, P., & Kobourov, S. G. (2002). GRIP: Graph drawing with intelligent placement. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 6(3), 203–224.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
McArdle, J. J., & McDonald, R. P. (1984). Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 234–251.
SAS Institute Inc. (2013). SAS structural equation modeling 2 for JMP. NC: Author.
SAS Institute Inc. (2014). SAS/STAT 13.2 user’s guide. NC: Author.
Wheaton, B., Muthén, B. O., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Yung, Y. F. (2014). Creating path diagrams that impress: A new graphical capability of the CALIS procedure. http://support.sas.com/rnd/app/stat/papers/2014/yungpd2014.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yung, YF. (2015). Path Diagrams: Layout Algorithms, Styles, and Views. In: van der Ark, L., Bolt, D., Wang, WC., Douglas, J., Chow, SM. (eds) Quantitative Psychology Research. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 140. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19977-1_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19977-1_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19976-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19977-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)