Skip to main content

The Role of Home Monitoring

  • Chapter
Clinical Cases in Cardiology

Abstract

In the last years, a new technology such as the remote monitoring (RM) is developed and permits surveillance and device assessment from any location of the patient. RM is important to facilitate early diagnosis of arrhythmia and evaluate earlier than in-office visit problems with the device or leads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wilkoff BL et al (2009) Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management. Heart Rhythm 6(7):1085–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubner S, Auricchio A, Steinberg JS, Vardas P, Stone P, Brugada J et al (2012) ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Europace 14:278–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilkoff BL, Auricchio A, Brugada J, Cowie M, Ellenbogen KA, Gillis AM et al (2008) HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. Heart Rhythm 5:907–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Krebsbach A, Alhumaid F, Henrikson CA, Calkins H, Berger RD, Cheng A (2011) Premature failure of a Riata defibrillator lead without impedance change or inappropriate sensing: a case report and review of the literature. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22:1070–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hauser RG, McGriff D, Retel LK (2012) Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure: analysis of explanted leads with a unique insulation defect. Heart Rhythm 9:742–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu CM, Wang L, Chau E, Chan RH, Kong SL, Tang MO et al (2005) Intrathoracic impedance monitoring in patients with heart failure: correlation with fluid status and feasibility of early warning preceding hospitalization. Circulation 112(6):841–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crossley GH, Chen J, Choucair W et al (2009) Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(22):2012–2019. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Varma N, Epstein A, Irimpen A, Schweikert R, Shah J, Love CJ, TRUST Investigators (2010) Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for ICD follow-up: the TRUST trial. Circulation 122:325–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crossley GH, Boyle A, Vitense H, Chang Y, Mead RH, CONNECT Investigators (2011) Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision (CONNECT) Trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1181–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Landolina M, Perego GB, Lunati M, Curnis A, Guenzati G, Vicentini A et al (2012) Remote monitoring reduces healthcare utilization and improves quality of care in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: the EVOLVO (Evolution of Management Strategies of Heart Failure Patients with Implantable Defibrillators) Study. Circulation 125:2985–2992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ricci RP, Morichelli L, Santini M (2009) Remote control of implanted devices through Home Monitoring technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation. Europace 11:54–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mabo P, Victor F, Bazin P, Ahres S, Babuty D, Da Costa A et al (2012) A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (The COMPAS trial). Eur Heart J 33:1105–1111

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. ECkstein J, Koller MT, Zabel M, Kalusche D, Schaer BA, Osswald S et al (2008) Necessity for surgical revision of defibrillator leads implanted long-term: causes and management. Circulation 117(21):2727–2733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maisel WH, Kramer DB (2008) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead performance. Circulation 117(21):2721–2723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricci RP, Morichelli L, Santini M (2008) Home Monitoring remote control of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients in clinical practice: impact on medical management and health-care resource utilization. Europace 10(2):164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abraham WT, Compton S, Haas G, Foreman B, Canby RC, Rishel R et al (2011) Intrathoracic impedance vs daily weight monitoring for predicting worsening heart failure events: results of the Fluid Accumulation Status Trial (FAST). Congest Heart Fail 17(2):51–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Conraads VM, Tavazzi L, Santini M, Oliva F, Gerritse B, Yu CM et al (2011) Sensitivity and positive predictive value of implantable intrathoracic impedance monitoring as a predictor of heart failure hospitalizations: the SENSE-HF trial. Eur Heart J 32(18):2266–2273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Veldhuisen DJ, Braunschweig F, Conraads V, Ford I, Cowie MR, Jondeau G et al.; DOT-HF Investigators (2011) Intrathoracic impedance monitoring, audible patient alerts, and outcome in patients with heart failure. Circulation 124(16):1719–1726

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brachmann J, Böhm M, Rybak K, Klein G, Butter C, Klemm H et al (2011) Fluid status monitoring with a wireless network to reduce cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and mortality in heart failure: rationale and design of the OptiLink HF Study (Optimization of Heart Failure Management using OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring and CareLink). Eur J Heart Fail 13(7):796–804

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Whellan DJ, Ousdigian KT, Al-Khatib SM, Pu W, Sarkar S, Porter CB et al.; PARTNERS Study Investigators (2010) Combined heart failure device diagnostics identify patients at higher risk of subsequent heart failure hospitalizations: results from PARTNERS HF (Program to Access and Review Trending Information and Evaluate Correlation to Symptoms in Patients With Heart Failure) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(17):1803–1810

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simons EC, Feigenblum DY, Nemirovsky D, Simons GR (2009) Alert tones are frequently inaudible among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32(10):1272–1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, IsraelCW, Van Gelder IC Capucci A et al.; for the ASSERT Investigators (2012) Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 366:120–129

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guedon-Moreau L, Lacroix D, Sadoul N, Clementy J, Kouakam C, Hermida JS et al (2013) A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial. Eur Heart J 34(8):605–614. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs425

  24. Schron EB, Exner DV, Yao Q, Yao Q, Jenkins LS, Steinberg JS, Cook JR, Kutalek SP, Friedman PL, Bubien RS, Page RL, Powell J (2002) Quality of life in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial: impact of therapy and influence of adverse symptoms and defibrillator shocks. Circulation 105:589–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hernández-Madrid A, Lewalter T, Proclemer A, Pison L, Lip GY, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C (2014) Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Europe: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace 16(1):129–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Cipolletta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cipolletta, L., Ricciotti, J. (2015). The Role of Home Monitoring. In: Capucci, A. (eds) Clinical Cases in Cardiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19926-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19926-9_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19925-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19926-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics